Loading…
Epistemology: The Feeble Philosophical Foundation of Knowledge Management
According to the traditional epistemology of knowledge, it means information; and the concepts of truth and justification are tightly coupled. In knowledge management (KM), both principles are compromised: knowledge is distinguished from information, and truth is detached from justification. The pap...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | According to the traditional epistemology of knowledge, it means information; and the concepts of truth and justification are tightly coupled. In knowledge management (KM), both principles are compromised: knowledge is distinguished from information, and truth is detached from justification. The paper argues that KM loses a lot of scientific rigor due to these discrepancies; and as a result, organizations face the risk and pay the cost of managing false knowledge. Because traditional epistemology may not fully fit the organizational context, modifications should be done; however, the alternative of inaction is the worst. Specifically, an organizational theory of knowledge is required, including a consistent knowledge definition and adequate methodologies for justification. The paper suggests specific research directions in this regard. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2048-8963 2048-8971 |