Loading…

Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order

Despite decades of research on the ecological consequences of stream network expansion, contraction and fragmentation, surprisingly little is known about the hydrological mechanisms that shape these processes. Here, we present field surveys of the active drainage networks of four California headwate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 2014-11, Vol.28 (23), p.5791-5803
Main Authors: Godsey, S. E, Kirchner, J. W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3
container_end_page 5803
container_issue 23
container_start_page 5791
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 28
creator Godsey, S. E
Kirchner, J. W
description Despite decades of research on the ecological consequences of stream network expansion, contraction and fragmentation, surprisingly little is known about the hydrological mechanisms that shape these processes. Here, we present field surveys of the active drainage networks of four California headwater streams (4–27 km²) spanning diverse topographic, geologic and climatic settings. We show that these stream networks dynamically expand, contract, disconnect and reconnect across all the sites we studied. Stream networks at all four sites contract and disconnect during seasonal flow recessions, with their total active network length, and thus their active drainage densities, decreasing by factors of two to three across the range of flows captured in our field surveys. The total flowing lengths of the active stream networks are approximate power‐law functions of unit discharge, with scaling exponents averaging 0.27 ± 0.04 (range: 0.18–0.40). The number of points where surface flow originates obey similar power‐law relationships, as do the lengths and origination points of flowing networks that are continuously connected to the outlet, with scaling exponents averaging 0.36–0.48. Even stream order shifts seasonally by up to two Strahler orders in our study catchments. Broadly, similar stream length scaling has been observed in catchments spanning widely varying geologic, topographic and climatic settings and spanning more than two orders of magnitude in size, suggesting that network extension/contraction is a general phenomenon that may have a general explanation. Points of emergence or disappearance of surface flow represent the balance between subsurface transmissivity in the hyporheic zone and the delivery of water from upstream. Thus the dynamics of stream network expansion and contraction, and connection and disconnection, may offer important clues to the spatial structure of the hyporheic zone, and to patterns and processes of runoff generation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.10310
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1673829011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3657318951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhwC_AEiekph0n649wQy30UwWJloqTNYmdXbdZe7GzXfIH-N01TcuN04xmnndm9A4hbxnsMYByfzmuc1IxeEZmDOq6YKD4czIDpXghQMmX5FVKNwAwBwUz8udw9Lhy7S41LrXBD85vwibRNESLK-rtsA3xNn2ky9HE0IeFa7HvR2qiu7Oe3mF0OLjgE3WeYjvkau6h87jIifXJDeMu7fqwdX5B2yV6b_tE0ZunFSEaG1-TFx32yb55jDvk6svny4Pj4vzr0cnBp_MCOVNQKMOQm7lSTStqbiSXFZQVGjvvQAlRy3ouO95wbBqsO6EkF4BtyTpp6wbRVjvk_TR3HcOvjU2Dvgmb6PNKzYSsVFkDY5n6MFFtDClF2-l1dCuMo2ag_9qss836webM7k_s1vV2_D-oj39-e1IUk8Klwf7-p8B4q_MJkuvriyN9yc9Or3-cgb7I_LuJ7zBoXESX9NX3EhjPT2SiAlHdAzComkU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673829011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Godsey, S. E ; Kirchner, J. W</creator><creatorcontrib>Godsey, S. E ; Kirchner, J. W</creatorcontrib><description>Despite decades of research on the ecological consequences of stream network expansion, contraction and fragmentation, surprisingly little is known about the hydrological mechanisms that shape these processes. Here, we present field surveys of the active drainage networks of four California headwater streams (4–27 km²) spanning diverse topographic, geologic and climatic settings. We show that these stream networks dynamically expand, contract, disconnect and reconnect across all the sites we studied. Stream networks at all four sites contract and disconnect during seasonal flow recessions, with their total active network length, and thus their active drainage densities, decreasing by factors of two to three across the range of flows captured in our field surveys. The total flowing lengths of the active stream networks are approximate power‐law functions of unit discharge, with scaling exponents averaging 0.27 ± 0.04 (range: 0.18–0.40). The number of points where surface flow originates obey similar power‐law relationships, as do the lengths and origination points of flowing networks that are continuously connected to the outlet, with scaling exponents averaging 0.36–0.48. Even stream order shifts seasonally by up to two Strahler orders in our study catchments. Broadly, similar stream length scaling has been observed in catchments spanning widely varying geologic, topographic and climatic settings and spanning more than two orders of magnitude in size, suggesting that network extension/contraction is a general phenomenon that may have a general explanation. Points of emergence or disappearance of surface flow represent the balance between subsurface transmissivity in the hyporheic zone and the delivery of water from upstream. Thus the dynamics of stream network expansion and contraction, and connection and disconnection, may offer important clues to the spatial structure of the hyporheic zone, and to patterns and processes of runoff generation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley</publisher><subject>catchment hydrology ; channel head ; drainage ; drainage density ; headwater basins ; overland flow ; runoff ; stream channels ; stream network ; stream order ; subsurface flow ; surveys ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2014-11, Vol.28 (23), p.5791-5803</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Godsey, S. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, J. W</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Despite decades of research on the ecological consequences of stream network expansion, contraction and fragmentation, surprisingly little is known about the hydrological mechanisms that shape these processes. Here, we present field surveys of the active drainage networks of four California headwater streams (4–27 km²) spanning diverse topographic, geologic and climatic settings. We show that these stream networks dynamically expand, contract, disconnect and reconnect across all the sites we studied. Stream networks at all four sites contract and disconnect during seasonal flow recessions, with their total active network length, and thus their active drainage densities, decreasing by factors of two to three across the range of flows captured in our field surveys. The total flowing lengths of the active stream networks are approximate power‐law functions of unit discharge, with scaling exponents averaging 0.27 ± 0.04 (range: 0.18–0.40). The number of points where surface flow originates obey similar power‐law relationships, as do the lengths and origination points of flowing networks that are continuously connected to the outlet, with scaling exponents averaging 0.36–0.48. Even stream order shifts seasonally by up to two Strahler orders in our study catchments. Broadly, similar stream length scaling has been observed in catchments spanning widely varying geologic, topographic and climatic settings and spanning more than two orders of magnitude in size, suggesting that network extension/contraction is a general phenomenon that may have a general explanation. Points of emergence or disappearance of surface flow represent the balance between subsurface transmissivity in the hyporheic zone and the delivery of water from upstream. Thus the dynamics of stream network expansion and contraction, and connection and disconnection, may offer important clues to the spatial structure of the hyporheic zone, and to patterns and processes of runoff generation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>catchment hydrology</subject><subject>channel head</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>drainage density</subject><subject>headwater basins</subject><subject>overland flow</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>stream channels</subject><subject>stream network</subject><subject>stream order</subject><subject>subsurface flow</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhwC_AEiekph0n649wQy30UwWJloqTNYmdXbdZe7GzXfIH-N01TcuN04xmnndm9A4hbxnsMYByfzmuc1IxeEZmDOq6YKD4czIDpXghQMmX5FVKNwAwBwUz8udw9Lhy7S41LrXBD85vwibRNESLK-rtsA3xNn2ky9HE0IeFa7HvR2qiu7Oe3mF0OLjgE3WeYjvkau6h87jIifXJDeMu7fqwdX5B2yV6b_tE0ZunFSEaG1-TFx32yb55jDvk6svny4Pj4vzr0cnBp_MCOVNQKMOQm7lSTStqbiSXFZQVGjvvQAlRy3ouO95wbBqsO6EkF4BtyTpp6wbRVjvk_TR3HcOvjU2Dvgmb6PNKzYSsVFkDY5n6MFFtDClF2-l1dCuMo2ag_9qss836webM7k_s1vV2_D-oj39-e1IUk8Klwf7-p8B4q_MJkuvriyN9yc9Or3-cgb7I_LuJ7zBoXESX9NX3EhjPT2SiAlHdAzComkU</recordid><startdate>20141115</startdate><enddate>20141115</enddate><creator>Godsey, S. E</creator><creator>Kirchner, J. W</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141115</creationdate><title>Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order</title><author>Godsey, S. E ; Kirchner, J. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>catchment hydrology</topic><topic>channel head</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>drainage density</topic><topic>headwater basins</topic><topic>overland flow</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>stream channels</topic><topic>stream network</topic><topic>stream order</topic><topic>subsurface flow</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Godsey, S. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirchner, J. W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Godsey, S. E</au><au>Kirchner, J. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2014-11-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>5791</spage><epage>5803</epage><pages>5791-5803</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Despite decades of research on the ecological consequences of stream network expansion, contraction and fragmentation, surprisingly little is known about the hydrological mechanisms that shape these processes. Here, we present field surveys of the active drainage networks of four California headwater streams (4–27 km²) spanning diverse topographic, geologic and climatic settings. We show that these stream networks dynamically expand, contract, disconnect and reconnect across all the sites we studied. Stream networks at all four sites contract and disconnect during seasonal flow recessions, with their total active network length, and thus their active drainage densities, decreasing by factors of two to three across the range of flows captured in our field surveys. The total flowing lengths of the active stream networks are approximate power‐law functions of unit discharge, with scaling exponents averaging 0.27 ± 0.04 (range: 0.18–0.40). The number of points where surface flow originates obey similar power‐law relationships, as do the lengths and origination points of flowing networks that are continuously connected to the outlet, with scaling exponents averaging 0.36–0.48. Even stream order shifts seasonally by up to two Strahler orders in our study catchments. Broadly, similar stream length scaling has been observed in catchments spanning widely varying geologic, topographic and climatic settings and spanning more than two orders of magnitude in size, suggesting that network extension/contraction is a general phenomenon that may have a general explanation. Points of emergence or disappearance of surface flow represent the balance between subsurface transmissivity in the hyporheic zone and the delivery of water from upstream. Thus the dynamics of stream network expansion and contraction, and connection and disconnection, may offer important clues to the spatial structure of the hyporheic zone, and to patterns and processes of runoff generation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10310</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2014-11, Vol.28 (23), p.5791-5803
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1673829011
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects catchment hydrology
channel head
drainage
drainage density
headwater basins
overland flow
runoff
stream channels
stream network
stream order
subsurface flow
surveys
watersheds
title Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic,%20discontinuous%20stream%20networks:%20hydrologically%20driven%20variations%20in%20active%20drainage%20density,%20flowing%20channels%20and%20stream%20order&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Godsey,%20S.%E2%80%89E&rft.date=2014-11-15&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=5791&rft.epage=5803&rft.pages=5791-5803&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10310&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3657318951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5180-8d1a5d488bc695d7573023ade4f086697947f5b5abba9f687560ac21f7e9baae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673829011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true