Loading…
Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1
The development of effective feeding strategies to reduce the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ac (ETEC) plays a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of therapeutic intervention with antibiotics in livestock. The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 (SCC), suppl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2015-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2225 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2225 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Trevisi, P Colombo, M Priori, D Fontanesi, L Galimberti, G Calò, G Motta, V Latorre, R Fanelli, F Mezzullo, M Pagotto, U Gherpelli, Y D'Inca, R Bosi, P |
description | The development of effective feeding strategies to reduce the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ac (ETEC) plays a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of therapeutic intervention with antibiotics in livestock. The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 (SCC), supplied in different patterns to counteract ETEC infection in weaned pigs, was evaluated. Fifty pigs weaned at 24 d were then divided into 5 groups: control (CO), CO + colistin (AB), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed, from d 0 to 21 (PR), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed from d 7 to 11 (CM), and CO + 1 shot of 2 x 10^sup 11^ cfu of SCC when the first diarrhea appeared (CU). On d 7 postweaning, all the pigs were orally challenged with 108 cfu of ETEC. Blood samples were taken from the pigs (d 7, 8, 12, and 21) while the fecal excretion of ETEC was assessed on d 7 and 10. Fecal consistency was scored from 12 h before infection to 144 h postinfection (p.i.). On d 21, the pigs were sacrificed. The in vitro adhesion test on the intestinal villi confirmed individual susceptibility to ETEC, excluding the presence of resistant pigs. Growth performance did not differ between the treatments. Mortality was reduced in the AB group (P < 0.01) and, marginally, in the PR group (P = 0.089) when compared to the CO group. The CO group had a higher fecal score than AB in the period of observation (from P = 0.01 to P < 0.001). Yeast administration reduced the fecal score when compared to the CO group 12 and 48 h p.i. (P = 0.04). Total IgA never differed among the treatments, but the ETECspecific IgA concentration was lower in the AB group than in CO (P = 0.04) at d 12. Four days p.i., the pigs fed live yeast had reduced ETEC excretion compared with the CO pigs (P = 0.05). Blood concentrations of dodecenoyl-L-carnitine (P < 0.01), glutaryl-L-carnitine/ hydroxyhex-anoyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylcholine diacyl and phosphatidylcholine diacyl (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and α-amino adipic acid (P < 0.01) were reduced in the AB group compared to the CO group; PR + CM reduced the concentration of sphingomyelin-ceramide (P = 0.02) and increased the concentration of decadienyl-L-carnitine (C10:2; P = 0.02) vs. CO. The CM group had an increased concentration of C10:2 (P < 0.01) compared to the PR group. In conclusion, the administration of live yeast, even in concomitance with ETEC infections, reduces pig illness and mortality. The strain of SCC tested did not show a ther |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1684392487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3700752951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_16843924873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk1PwzAMhisEEuXjP1jiuklNP0Z3njZxh_vkpu7qKU1CnG7af-ZHkCG4c7Fl-9Xj5ybLVVM2y0qtqtssL4pSLdtWlffZg8ixKFTZrJs8-9q4yWNgcRbcAHEMROAxRgpWrpuBqAeZvTc0kY0YOSXPHEcwfCJ4R61HDG66aBLQFOjEwkhwIZQIKeudxDOhZXuAnjGEkXABqZjEkAScZQFoe-iMcz1MFLFzhjX44AY2dJWQWTT5yF0a_1ieD0kwoDEXSArGkD0k1R-1reiRAuuREXSCwa5GDeopuxvQCD3_9sfsZbf92Lwt06vPmSTuj24ONp32atXW1bqs29fqf6lv3hJ7Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684392487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Trevisi, P ; Colombo, M ; Priori, D ; Fontanesi, L ; Galimberti, G ; Calò, G ; Motta, V ; Latorre, R ; Fanelli, F ; Mezzullo, M ; Pagotto, U ; Gherpelli, Y ; D'Inca, R ; Bosi, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Trevisi, P ; Colombo, M ; Priori, D ; Fontanesi, L ; Galimberti, G ; Calò, G ; Motta, V ; Latorre, R ; Fanelli, F ; Mezzullo, M ; Pagotto, U ; Gherpelli, Y ; D'Inca, R ; Bosi, P</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The development of effective feeding strategies to reduce the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ac (ETEC) plays a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of therapeutic intervention with antibiotics in livestock. The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 (SCC), supplied in different patterns to counteract ETEC infection in weaned pigs, was evaluated. Fifty pigs weaned at 24 d were then divided into 5 groups: control (CO), CO + colistin (AB), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed, from d 0 to 21 (PR), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed from d 7 to 11 (CM), and CO + 1 shot of 2 x 10^sup 11^ cfu of SCC when the first diarrhea appeared (CU). On d 7 postweaning, all the pigs were orally challenged with 108 cfu of ETEC. Blood samples were taken from the pigs (d 7, 8, 12, and 21) while the fecal excretion of ETEC was assessed on d 7 and 10. Fecal consistency was scored from 12 h before infection to 144 h postinfection (p.i.). On d 21, the pigs were sacrificed. The in vitro adhesion test on the intestinal villi confirmed individual susceptibility to ETEC, excluding the presence of resistant pigs. Growth performance did not differ between the treatments. Mortality was reduced in the AB group (P < 0.01) and, marginally, in the PR group (P = 0.089) when compared to the CO group. The CO group had a higher fecal score than AB in the period of observation (from P = 0.01 to P < 0.001). Yeast administration reduced the fecal score when compared to the CO group 12 and 48 h p.i. (P = 0.04). Total IgA never differed among the treatments, but the ETECspecific IgA concentration was lower in the AB group than in CO (P = 0.04) at d 12. Four days p.i., the pigs fed live yeast had reduced ETEC excretion compared with the CO pigs (P = 0.05). Blood concentrations of dodecenoyl-L-carnitine (P < 0.01), glutaryl-L-carnitine/ hydroxyhex-anoyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylcholine diacyl and phosphatidylcholine diacyl (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and α-amino adipic acid (P < 0.01) were reduced in the AB group compared to the CO group; PR + CM reduced the concentration of sphingomyelin-ceramide (P = 0.02) and increased the concentration of decadienyl-L-carnitine (C10:2; P = 0.02) vs. CO. The CM group had an increased concentration of C10:2 (P < 0.01) compared to the PR group. In conclusion, the administration of live yeast, even in concomitance with ETEC infections, reduces pig illness and mortality. The strain of SCC tested did not show a therapeutic effect.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal sciences ; Blood ; E coli ; Hogs ; Metabolism ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2015-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2225</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science May 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trevisi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priori, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galimberti, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calò, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motta, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezzullo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagotto, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gherpelli, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Inca, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosi, P</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[The development of effective feeding strategies to reduce the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ac (ETEC) plays a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of therapeutic intervention with antibiotics in livestock. The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 (SCC), supplied in different patterns to counteract ETEC infection in weaned pigs, was evaluated. Fifty pigs weaned at 24 d were then divided into 5 groups: control (CO), CO + colistin (AB), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed, from d 0 to 21 (PR), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed from d 7 to 11 (CM), and CO + 1 shot of 2 x 10^sup 11^ cfu of SCC when the first diarrhea appeared (CU). On d 7 postweaning, all the pigs were orally challenged with 108 cfu of ETEC. Blood samples were taken from the pigs (d 7, 8, 12, and 21) while the fecal excretion of ETEC was assessed on d 7 and 10. Fecal consistency was scored from 12 h before infection to 144 h postinfection (p.i.). On d 21, the pigs were sacrificed. The in vitro adhesion test on the intestinal villi confirmed individual susceptibility to ETEC, excluding the presence of resistant pigs. Growth performance did not differ between the treatments. Mortality was reduced in the AB group (P < 0.01) and, marginally, in the PR group (P = 0.089) when compared to the CO group. The CO group had a higher fecal score than AB in the period of observation (from P = 0.01 to P < 0.001). Yeast administration reduced the fecal score when compared to the CO group 12 and 48 h p.i. (P = 0.04). Total IgA never differed among the treatments, but the ETECspecific IgA concentration was lower in the AB group than in CO (P = 0.04) at d 12. Four days p.i., the pigs fed live yeast had reduced ETEC excretion compared with the CO pigs (P = 0.05). Blood concentrations of dodecenoyl-L-carnitine (P < 0.01), glutaryl-L-carnitine/ hydroxyhex-anoyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylcholine diacyl and phosphatidylcholine diacyl (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and α-amino adipic acid (P < 0.01) were reduced in the AB group compared to the CO group; PR + CM reduced the concentration of sphingomyelin-ceramide (P = 0.02) and increased the concentration of decadienyl-L-carnitine (C10:2; P = 0.02) vs. CO. The CM group had an increased concentration of C10:2 (P < 0.01) compared to the PR group. In conclusion, the administration of live yeast, even in concomitance with ETEC infections, reduces pig illness and mortality. The strain of SCC tested did not show a therapeutic effect.]]></description><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjk1PwzAMhisEEuXjP1jiuklNP0Z3njZxh_vkpu7qKU1CnG7af-ZHkCG4c7Fl-9Xj5ybLVVM2y0qtqtssL4pSLdtWlffZg8ixKFTZrJs8-9q4yWNgcRbcAHEMROAxRgpWrpuBqAeZvTc0kY0YOSXPHEcwfCJ4R61HDG66aBLQFOjEwkhwIZQIKeudxDOhZXuAnjGEkXABqZjEkAScZQFoe-iMcz1MFLFzhjX44AY2dJWQWTT5yF0a_1ieD0kwoDEXSArGkD0k1R-1reiRAuuREXSCwa5GDeopuxvQCD3_9sfsZbf92Lwt06vPmSTuj24ONp32atXW1bqs29fqf6lv3hJ7Kg</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Trevisi, P</creator><creator>Colombo, M</creator><creator>Priori, D</creator><creator>Fontanesi, L</creator><creator>Galimberti, G</creator><creator>Calò, G</creator><creator>Motta, V</creator><creator>Latorre, R</creator><creator>Fanelli, F</creator><creator>Mezzullo, M</creator><creator>Pagotto, U</creator><creator>Gherpelli, Y</creator><creator>D'Inca, R</creator><creator>Bosi, P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1</title><author>Trevisi, P ; Colombo, M ; Priori, D ; Fontanesi, L ; Galimberti, G ; Calò, G ; Motta, V ; Latorre, R ; Fanelli, F ; Mezzullo, M ; Pagotto, U ; Gherpelli, Y ; D'Inca, R ; Bosi, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16843924873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trevisi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priori, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galimberti, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calò, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motta, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezzullo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagotto, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gherpelli, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Inca, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosi, P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trevisi, P</au><au>Colombo, M</au><au>Priori, D</au><au>Fontanesi, L</au><au>Galimberti, G</au><au>Calò, G</au><au>Motta, V</au><au>Latorre, R</au><au>Fanelli, F</au><au>Mezzullo, M</au><au>Pagotto, U</au><au>Gherpelli, Y</au><au>D'Inca, R</au><au>Bosi, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2225</spage><pages>2225-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The development of effective feeding strategies to reduce the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ac (ETEC) plays a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of therapeutic intervention with antibiotics in livestock. The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 (SCC), supplied in different patterns to counteract ETEC infection in weaned pigs, was evaluated. Fifty pigs weaned at 24 d were then divided into 5 groups: control (CO), CO + colistin (AB), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed, from d 0 to 21 (PR), CO + 5 x 10^sup 10^ cfu of SCC/ kg feed from d 7 to 11 (CM), and CO + 1 shot of 2 x 10^sup 11^ cfu of SCC when the first diarrhea appeared (CU). On d 7 postweaning, all the pigs were orally challenged with 108 cfu of ETEC. Blood samples were taken from the pigs (d 7, 8, 12, and 21) while the fecal excretion of ETEC was assessed on d 7 and 10. Fecal consistency was scored from 12 h before infection to 144 h postinfection (p.i.). On d 21, the pigs were sacrificed. The in vitro adhesion test on the intestinal villi confirmed individual susceptibility to ETEC, excluding the presence of resistant pigs. Growth performance did not differ between the treatments. Mortality was reduced in the AB group (P < 0.01) and, marginally, in the PR group (P = 0.089) when compared to the CO group. The CO group had a higher fecal score than AB in the period of observation (from P = 0.01 to P < 0.001). Yeast administration reduced the fecal score when compared to the CO group 12 and 48 h p.i. (P = 0.04). Total IgA never differed among the treatments, but the ETECspecific IgA concentration was lower in the AB group than in CO (P = 0.04) at d 12. Four days p.i., the pigs fed live yeast had reduced ETEC excretion compared with the CO pigs (P = 0.05). Blood concentrations of dodecenoyl-L-carnitine (P < 0.01), glutaryl-L-carnitine/ hydroxyhex-anoyl-L-carnitine, phosphatidylcholine diacyl and phosphatidylcholine diacyl (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and α-amino adipic acid (P < 0.01) were reduced in the AB group compared to the CO group; PR + CM reduced the concentration of sphingomyelin-ceramide (P = 0.02) and increased the concentration of decadienyl-L-carnitine (C10:2; P = 0.02) vs. CO. The CM group had an increased concentration of C10:2 (P < 0.01) compared to the PR group. In conclusion, the administration of live yeast, even in concomitance with ETEC infections, reduces pig illness and mortality. The strain of SCC tested did not show a therapeutic effect.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2015-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2225 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1684392487 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Animal sciences Blood E coli Hogs Metabolism Yeast |
title | Comparison of three patterns of feed supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on postweaning diarrhea, health status, and blood metabolic profile of susceptible weaning pigs orally challenged with Escherichia coli F4ac 1 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A19%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20patterns%20of%20feed%20supplementation%20with%20live%20Saccharomyces%20cerevisiae%20yeast%20on%20postweaning%20diarrhea,%20health%20status,%20and%20blood%20metabolic%20profile%20of%20susceptible%20weaning%20pigs%20orally%20challenged%20with%20Escherichia%20coli%20F4ac%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Trevisi,%20P&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2225&rft.pages=2225-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3700752951%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_16843924873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684392487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |