Loading…
Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera
Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Systematic entomology 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343 |
container_end_page | 569 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 547 |
container_title | Systematic entomology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | SZAWARYN, KAROL BOCAK, LADISLAV ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ESCALONA, HERMES E TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA |
description | Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/syen.12121 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1684963601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3701670701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwhfAEhdATbHjxM72hlbblqoqiLaq4GL5z2Tj4trBznbJkW-OSyhHZg5z-b33pDdF8ZLgA5LnfZrAH5Aq76NiQShrSkoIfVwsMMW8ZEuOnxbPUrrBGFectYvi1-d-cmEDfkLSGwR3wW1HGzwKHRr6aQxDLzdhm5CTZlI2GqQARgcJvVkFB2EYIcpDtApaWw_OWSPhEK0H66TuvfX27T7a2bFHEXTYePvg7WGHcmoWPy-edNIlePH37hVXR-vL1Ul59un44-rDWalrSklZLWtNG960ulOyBa4I1rIjWrcEamIMY4ZXXYM1V_WyUoZJpRltDFHK1JzWdK94PfsOMfzYQhrFTdhGnyMFYW29ZJRhkql3M6VjSClCJ4Zob2WcBMHivmJxX7H4U3GGyQzvrIPpP6S4-Lo-f9CUs8amEX7-08j4XTBOeSOuz4_F5fXJt6PT9lR8yfyrme9kEHITbRJXFxUmTf5gxWtC6W9H95lz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684963601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creator><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/syen.12121</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYENDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian theory ; crops ; data collection ; Epilachna ; Evolution ; genetic markers ; mitochondrial DNA ; monophyly ; Morphology ; new genus ; paraphyly ; pests ; Phylogenetics ; ribosomal RNA</subject><ispartof>Systematic entomology, 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569</ispartof><rights>2015 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><title>Systematic entomology</title><addtitle>Syst Entomol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Epilachna</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>monophyly</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>new genus</subject><subject>paraphyly</subject><subject>pests</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>ribosomal RNA</subject><issn>0307-6970</issn><issn>1365-3113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwhfAEhdATbHjxM72hlbblqoqiLaq4GL5z2Tj4trBznbJkW-OSyhHZg5z-b33pDdF8ZLgA5LnfZrAH5Aq76NiQShrSkoIfVwsMMW8ZEuOnxbPUrrBGFectYvi1-d-cmEDfkLSGwR3wW1HGzwKHRr6aQxDLzdhm5CTZlI2GqQARgcJvVkFB2EYIcpDtApaWw_OWSPhEK0H66TuvfX27T7a2bFHEXTYePvg7WGHcmoWPy-edNIlePH37hVXR-vL1Ul59un44-rDWalrSklZLWtNG960ulOyBa4I1rIjWrcEamIMY4ZXXYM1V_WyUoZJpRltDFHK1JzWdK94PfsOMfzYQhrFTdhGnyMFYW29ZJRhkql3M6VjSClCJ4Zob2WcBMHivmJxX7H4U3GGyQzvrIPpP6S4-Lo-f9CUs8amEX7-08j4XTBOeSOuz4_F5fXJt6PT9lR8yfyrme9kEHITbRJXFxUmTf5gxWtC6W9H95lz</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creator><creator>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creator><creator>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creator><creator>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creator><creator>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><author>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Epilachna</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>monophyly</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>new genus</topic><topic>paraphyly</topic><topic>pests</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>ribosomal RNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Systematic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SZAWARYN, KAROL</au><au>BOCAK, LADISLAV</au><au>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</au><au>ESCALONA, HERMES E</au><au>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</atitle><jtitle>Systematic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Entomol</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>547-569</pages><issn>0307-6970</issn><eissn>1365-3113</eissn><coden>SYENDM</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/syen.12121</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-6970 |
ispartof | Systematic entomology, 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569 |
issn | 0307-6970 1365-3113 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1684963601 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Bayesian theory crops data collection Epilachna Evolution genetic markers mitochondrial DNA monophyly Morphology new genus paraphyly pests Phylogenetics ribosomal RNA |
title | Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogeny%20and%20evolution%20of%20phytophagous%20ladybird%20beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Coccinellidae:%20Epilachnini),%20with%20recognition%20of%20new%20genera&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20entomology&rft.au=SZAWARYN,%20KAROL&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=547-569&rft.issn=0307-6970&rft.eissn=1365-3113&rft.coden=SYENDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/syen.12121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3701670701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684963601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |