Loading…

Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera

Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systematic entomology 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569
Main Authors: SZAWARYN, KAROL, BOCAK, LADISLAV, ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM, ESCALONA, HERMES E, TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343
container_end_page 569
container_issue 3
container_start_page 547
container_title Systematic entomology
container_volume 40
creator SZAWARYN, KAROL
BOCAK, LADISLAV
ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM
ESCALONA, HERMES E
TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA
description Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/syen.12121
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1684963601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3701670701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwhfAEhdATbHjxM72hlbblqoqiLaq4GL5z2Tj4trBznbJkW-OSyhHZg5z-b33pDdF8ZLgA5LnfZrAH5Aq76NiQShrSkoIfVwsMMW8ZEuOnxbPUrrBGFectYvi1-d-cmEDfkLSGwR3wW1HGzwKHRr6aQxDLzdhm5CTZlI2GqQARgcJvVkFB2EYIcpDtApaWw_OWSPhEK0H66TuvfX27T7a2bFHEXTYePvg7WGHcmoWPy-edNIlePH37hVXR-vL1Ul59un44-rDWalrSklZLWtNG960ulOyBa4I1rIjWrcEamIMY4ZXXYM1V_WyUoZJpRltDFHK1JzWdK94PfsOMfzYQhrFTdhGnyMFYW29ZJRhkql3M6VjSClCJ4Zob2WcBMHivmJxX7H4U3GGyQzvrIPpP6S4-Lo-f9CUs8amEX7-08j4XTBOeSOuz4_F5fXJt6PT9lR8yfyrme9kEHITbRJXFxUmTf5gxWtC6W9H95lz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684963601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creator><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/syen.12121</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYENDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian theory ; crops ; data collection ; Epilachna ; Evolution ; genetic markers ; mitochondrial DNA ; monophyly ; Morphology ; new genus ; paraphyly ; pests ; Phylogenetics ; ribosomal RNA</subject><ispartof>Systematic entomology, 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569</ispartof><rights>2015 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><title>Systematic entomology</title><addtitle>Syst Entomol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Epilachna</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>monophyly</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>new genus</subject><subject>paraphyly</subject><subject>pests</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>ribosomal RNA</subject><issn>0307-6970</issn><issn>1365-3113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhwhfAEhdATbHjxM72hlbblqoqiLaq4GL5z2Tj4trBznbJkW-OSyhHZg5z-b33pDdF8ZLgA5LnfZrAH5Aq76NiQShrSkoIfVwsMMW8ZEuOnxbPUrrBGFectYvi1-d-cmEDfkLSGwR3wW1HGzwKHRr6aQxDLzdhm5CTZlI2GqQARgcJvVkFB2EYIcpDtApaWw_OWSPhEK0H66TuvfX27T7a2bFHEXTYePvg7WGHcmoWPy-edNIlePH37hVXR-vL1Ul59un44-rDWalrSklZLWtNG960ulOyBa4I1rIjWrcEamIMY4ZXXYM1V_WyUoZJpRltDFHK1JzWdK94PfsOMfzYQhrFTdhGnyMFYW29ZJRhkql3M6VjSClCJ4Zob2WcBMHivmJxX7H4U3GGyQzvrIPpP6S4-Lo-f9CUs8amEX7-08j4XTBOeSOuz4_F5fXJt6PT9lR8yfyrme9kEHITbRJXFxUmTf5gxWtC6W9H95lz</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creator><creator>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creator><creator>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creator><creator>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creator><creator>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</title><author>SZAWARYN, KAROL ; BOCAK, LADISLAV ; ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM ; ESCALONA, HERMES E ; TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Epilachna</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>monophyly</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>new genus</topic><topic>paraphyly</topic><topic>pests</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>ribosomal RNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SZAWARYN, KAROL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOCAK, LADISLAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ESCALONA, HERMES E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Systematic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SZAWARYN, KAROL</au><au>BOCAK, LADISLAV</au><au>ŚLIPIŃSKI, ADAM</au><au>ESCALONA, HERMES E</au><au>TOMASZEWSKA, WIOLETTA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera</atitle><jtitle>Systematic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Entomol</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>547-569</pages><issn>0307-6970</issn><eissn>1365-3113</eissn><coden>SYENDM</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Phytophagous ladybird beetles of the tribe Epilachnini are a cosmopolitan, species‐rich group of significant economic importance as pests of agricultural crops. The tribe is well characterized morphologically and clearly monophyletic, but very little is known about its internal phylogenetic relationships and their genus‐level taxonomy. In order to infer the evolutionary history of Epilachnini, test its monophyly and provide a phylogeny‐based classification, we assembled a comprehensive dataset, consisting of four DNA markers (18S and 28S rRNA and 16S, COI mtDNA) and a matrix of 104 morphological characters for 153 species of Epilachnini representing all previously recognised genera, ∼11% of the known species, and 14 outgroup taxa. Molecular, morphological and combined datasets were analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and Bayesian inference. Bayes factors and Approximately Unbiased tests (AU) were used to compare alternative phylogenetic hypotheses of unconstrained and backbone‐constrained analysis. Only 14 of the 25 included genera were recovered monophyletic, as originally defined. Afidentula Kapur, Afidenta Dieke, Afissula Kapur, Epilachna Chevrolat, Henosepilachna Li Toxotoma Weise and Mada Mulsant are shown to be poly‐ or paraphyletic; Chnootriba Chevrolat, Subafissa Bielawski, Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska and Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska form monophyletic groups within larger clades of genus level. All of these genera are redefined here. The two largest genera of Epilachnini, Epilachna Chevrolat and Henosepilachna Li were represented by multiple monophyletic clades, which we described as new genera: Chazeauiana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n.; Fuerschia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. and Ryszardia Tomaszewska & Szawaryn gen.n. The following new synonyms are proposed: Afissa Dieke (=Afissula Kapur); Henosepilachna Li in Li & Cook (=Subafissa Bielawski); Papuaepilachna Szawaryn & Tomaszewska (=Lalokia Szawaryn & Tomaszewska). This published work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440E7FA4‐C859‐47E0‐8335‐30D478CBA8FA.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/syen.12121</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-6970
ispartof Systematic entomology, 2015-07, Vol.40 (3), p.547-569
issn 0307-6970
1365-3113
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1684963601
source Wiley
subjects Bayesian analysis
Bayesian theory
crops
data collection
Epilachna
Evolution
genetic markers
mitochondrial DNA
monophyly
Morphology
new genus
paraphyly
pests
Phylogenetics
ribosomal RNA
title Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recognition of new genera
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogeny%20and%20evolution%20of%20phytophagous%20ladybird%20beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Coccinellidae:%20Epilachnini),%20with%20recognition%20of%20new%20genera&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20entomology&rft.au=SZAWARYN,%20KAROL&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=547-569&rft.issn=0307-6970&rft.eissn=1365-3113&rft.coden=SYENDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/syen.12121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3701670701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-294c35758cfba8e7b10caf1cc81e41dd66d72f50c7b492bd6abc635d1bbd47343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684963601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true