Loading…
Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition
Working Paper No. 12242 Data on sales of memory modules are used to explore several aspects of e-retail demand. There is a strong relationship between e-retail sales to a given state and sales tax rates that apply to purchases from online retailers. This suggests that there is substantial substituti...
Saved in:
Published in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2006-05, p.12242 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-eb45a93f618c9e7734b04808f00532d93d7682d50e185d325b7e820ab2c0e9e13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 12242 |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Ellison, Glenn Sara Fisher Ellison |
description | Working Paper No. 12242 Data on sales of memory modules are used to explore several aspects of e-retail demand. There is a strong relationship between e-retail sales to a given state and sales tax rates that apply to purchases from online retailers. This suggests that there is substantial substitution between online and online retail, and tax avoidance may be an important contributor to e-retail activity. Geography matters in two ways: we find some evidence that consumers prefer purchasing from firms in nearby states to benefit from faster shipping times as well as evidence of a separate preference for buying from in-state firms. Consumers appear fairly rational in some ways, but boundedly rational in others. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w12242 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1688542712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3716253301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-eb45a93f618c9e7734b04808f00532d93d7682d50e185d325b7e820ab2c0e9e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU1Lw0AUAPegYK36Gxa8Nvr2bTb71ptE-wGFgNRz2SQvmpJuarJF_fdW9DQwhxkhbhTcaU3Z_adCTPFMTIAcJei0vRCX47gDQCJQE7FchchD4ChfOPq2k0-896F-kBv_xeNMLrh_G_zh_XsmT1oWoWsDJ0XT_FLm_f7AsY1tH67EeeO7ka__ORWv8-dNvkzWxWKVP66TSoHDhMvUeKebTFHl2FqdlpASUANgNNZO1zYjrA2wIlNrNKVlQvAlVsCOlZ6K27_uYeg_jjzG7a4_DuG03KqMyKRoFeof3rpIlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1688542712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ellison, Glenn ; Sara Fisher Ellison</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Glenn ; Sara Fisher Ellison</creatorcontrib><description>Working Paper No. 12242 Data on sales of memory modules are used to explore several aspects of e-retail demand. There is a strong relationship between e-retail sales to a given state and sales tax rates that apply to purchases from online retailers. This suggests that there is substantial substitution between online and online retail, and tax avoidance may be an important contributor to e-retail activity. Geography matters in two ways: we find some evidence that consumers prefer purchasing from firms in nearby states to benefit from faster shipping times as well as evidence of a separate preference for buying from in-state firms. Consumers appear fairly rational in some ways, but boundedly rational in others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w12242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Competition ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Economic theory ; Geography ; Internet ; Prices ; Rationality ; Retail sales ; Retail stores ; Sales taxes ; Tax rates ; Websites</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2006-05, p.12242</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. May 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-eb45a93f618c9e7734b04808f00532d93d7682d50e185d325b7e820ab2c0e9e13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1688542712?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,11687,27924,36059,44362</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sara Fisher Ellison</creatorcontrib><title>Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Working Paper No. 12242 Data on sales of memory modules are used to explore several aspects of e-retail demand. There is a strong relationship between e-retail sales to a given state and sales tax rates that apply to purchases from online retailers. This suggests that there is substantial substitution between online and online retail, and tax avoidance may be an important contributor to e-retail activity. Geography matters in two ways: we find some evidence that consumers prefer purchasing from firms in nearby states to benefit from faster shipping times as well as evidence of a separate preference for buying from in-state firms. Consumers appear fairly rational in some ways, but boundedly rational in others.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Retail sales</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales taxes</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU1Lw0AUAPegYK36Gxa8Nvr2bTb71ptE-wGFgNRz2SQvmpJuarJF_fdW9DQwhxkhbhTcaU3Z_adCTPFMTIAcJei0vRCX47gDQCJQE7FchchD4ChfOPq2k0-896F-kBv_xeNMLrh_G_zh_XsmT1oWoWsDJ0XT_FLm_f7AsY1tH67EeeO7ka__ORWv8-dNvkzWxWKVP66TSoHDhMvUeKebTFHl2FqdlpASUANgNNZO1zYjrA2wIlNrNKVlQvAlVsCOlZ6K27_uYeg_jjzG7a4_DuG03KqMyKRoFeof3rpIlQ</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Ellison, Glenn</creator><creator>Sara Fisher Ellison</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition</title><author>Ellison, Glenn ; Sara Fisher Ellison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-eb45a93f618c9e7734b04808f00532d93d7682d50e185d325b7e820ab2c0e9e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Retail sales</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales taxes</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sara Fisher Ellison</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellison, Glenn</au><au>Sara Fisher Ellison</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><spage>12242</spage><pages>12242-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Working Paper No. 12242 Data on sales of memory modules are used to explore several aspects of e-retail demand. There is a strong relationship between e-retail sales to a given state and sales tax rates that apply to purchases from online retailers. This suggests that there is substantial substitution between online and online retail, and tax avoidance may be an important contributor to e-retail activity. Geography matters in two ways: we find some evidence that consumers prefer purchasing from firms in nearby states to benefit from faster shipping times as well as evidence of a separate preference for buying from in-state firms. Consumers appear fairly rational in some ways, but boundedly rational in others.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w12242</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2006-05, p.12242 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1688542712 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Competition Consumer behavior Consumers Economic theory Geography Internet Prices Rationality Retail sales Retail stores Sales taxes Tax rates Websites |
title | Internet Retail Demand: Taxes, Geography, and Online-Offline Competition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Internet%20Retail%20Demand:%20Taxes,%20Geography,%20and%20Online-Offline%20Competition&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Ellison,%20Glenn&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.spage=12242&rft.pages=12242-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w12242&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3716253301%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-eb45a93f618c9e7734b04808f00532d93d7682d50e185d325b7e820ab2c0e9e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1688542712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |