Loading…
A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output
Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model...
Saved in:
Published in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2008-12, p.14616 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 14616 |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Wang, J Christina Basu, Susanto Fernald, John G |
description | Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output? |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w14616 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1689307311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3717101891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tOwzAURL0AiVLgGyyxDvjawXaWoSoFqVCEYB3Zzg1Nyat-iN8nCFYzi9HRGUKugN0IoeXtN-QS5AlZMF3ojBdCnZHzEA6Mca0ZLEhV0g0O6E2XrY-p7Vrr29TTMgSM2atvXTt80nKa_GjcnsaRxj3SZzQheexxiHRs6MvYt4PpqBlq-oZzuTfDF92lOKV4QU4b0wW8_M8l-XhYv68es-1u87Qqt5kDVkDWuBzvOIq81uhyUNYqKSUoZ03uNFe_NyDHghvDCj7P6tqZWmiHljeWSbEk13_c2fSYMMTqMCY_W4UKpC4EUwJA_ABqEFI1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1689307311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><description>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w14616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Bond markets ; Central banks ; Economic theory ; Equilibrium ; Federal Reserve monetary policy ; Financial services ; Interest income ; Interest rates ; National income and product accounts ; NIPA ; Opportunity costs ; Productivity measurement ; Risk premiums ; Stockholders ; Value added</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2008-12, p.14616</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Dec 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1689307311?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,11668,27904,36039,44342</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Susanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</description><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Federal Reserve monetary policy</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Interest income</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>National income and product accounts</subject><subject>NIPA</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Productivity measurement</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tOwzAURL0AiVLgGyyxDvjawXaWoSoFqVCEYB3Zzg1Nyat-iN8nCFYzi9HRGUKugN0IoeXtN-QS5AlZMF3ojBdCnZHzEA6Mca0ZLEhV0g0O6E2XrY-p7Vrr29TTMgSM2atvXTt80nKa_GjcnsaRxj3SZzQheexxiHRs6MvYt4PpqBlq-oZzuTfDF92lOKV4QU4b0wW8_M8l-XhYv68es-1u87Qqt5kDVkDWuBzvOIq81uhyUNYqKSUoZ03uNFe_NyDHghvDCj7P6tqZWmiHljeWSbEk13_c2fSYMMTqMCY_W4UKpC4EUwJA_ABqEFI1</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Wang, J Christina</creator><creator>Basu, Susanto</creator><creator>Fernald, John G</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><author>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Federal Reserve monetary policy</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Interest income</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>National income and product accounts</topic><topic>NIPA</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Productivity measurement</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Susanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, J Christina</au><au>Basu, Susanto</au><au>Fernald, John G</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>14616</spage><pages>14616-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w14616</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2008-12, p.14616 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1689307311 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bond markets Central banks Economic theory Equilibrium Federal Reserve monetary policy Financial services Interest income Interest rates National income and product accounts NIPA Opportunity costs Productivity measurement Risk premiums Stockholders Value added |
title | A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20General-Equilibrium%20Asset-Pricing%20Approach%20to%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Nominal%20and%20Real%20Bank%20Output&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Wang,%20J%20Christina&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.spage=14616&rft.pages=14616-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w14616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3717101891%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1689307311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |