Loading…

A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output

Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NBER Working Paper Series 2008-12, p.14616
Main Authors: Wang, J Christina, Basu, Susanto, Fernald, John G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 14616
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Wang, J Christina
Basu, Susanto
Fernald, John G
description Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w14616
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1689307311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3717101891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tOwzAURL0AiVLgGyyxDvjawXaWoSoFqVCEYB3Zzg1Nyat-iN8nCFYzi9HRGUKugN0IoeXtN-QS5AlZMF3ojBdCnZHzEA6Mca0ZLEhV0g0O6E2XrY-p7Vrr29TTMgSM2atvXTt80nKa_GjcnsaRxj3SZzQheexxiHRs6MvYt4PpqBlq-oZzuTfDF92lOKV4QU4b0wW8_M8l-XhYv68es-1u87Qqt5kDVkDWuBzvOIq81uhyUNYqKSUoZ03uNFe_NyDHghvDCj7P6tqZWmiHljeWSbEk13_c2fSYMMTqMCY_W4UKpC4EUwJA_ABqEFI1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1689307311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><description>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w14616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Bond markets ; Central banks ; Economic theory ; Equilibrium ; Federal Reserve monetary policy ; Financial services ; Interest income ; Interest rates ; National income and product accounts ; NIPA ; Opportunity costs ; Productivity measurement ; Risk premiums ; Stockholders ; Value added</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2008-12, p.14616</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Dec 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1689307311?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,11668,27904,36039,44342</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Susanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</description><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Federal Reserve monetary policy</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Interest income</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>National income and product accounts</subject><subject>NIPA</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Productivity measurement</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tOwzAURL0AiVLgGyyxDvjawXaWoSoFqVCEYB3Zzg1Nyat-iN8nCFYzi9HRGUKugN0IoeXtN-QS5AlZMF3ojBdCnZHzEA6Mca0ZLEhV0g0O6E2XrY-p7Vrr29TTMgSM2atvXTt80nKa_GjcnsaRxj3SZzQheexxiHRs6MvYt4PpqBlq-oZzuTfDF92lOKV4QU4b0wW8_M8l-XhYv68es-1u87Qqt5kDVkDWuBzvOIq81uhyUNYqKSUoZ03uNFe_NyDHghvDCj7P6tqZWmiHljeWSbEk13_c2fSYMMTqMCY_W4UKpC4EUwJA_ABqEFI1</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Wang, J Christina</creator><creator>Basu, Susanto</creator><creator>Fernald, John G</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</title><author>Wang, J Christina ; Basu, Susanto ; Fernald, John G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Federal Reserve monetary policy</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Interest income</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>National income and product accounts</topic><topic>NIPA</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Productivity measurement</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, J Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Susanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernald, John G</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, J Christina</au><au>Basu, Susanto</au><au>Fernald, John G</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>14616</spage><pages>14616-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Working Paper No. 14616 This paper addresses the proper measurement of financial service output that is not priced explicitly. It shows how to impute nominal service output from financial intermediaries' interest income, and how to construct price indices for those financial services. We model financial intermediaries as providers of financial services which resolve asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders. We embed these intermediaries in a dynamic, stochastic, general-equilibrium model where assets are priced competitively according to their systematic risk, as in the standard consumption-based capital-asset-pricing model. In this environment, we show that it is critical to take risk into account in order to measure financial output accurately. We also show that even using a risk-adjusted reference rate does not solve all the problems associated with measuring nominal financial service output. Our model allows us to address important outstanding questions in output and productivity measurement for financial firms, such as: (1) What are the correct "reference rates" to use in calculating bank output? In particular, should they take account of risk? (2) If reference rates need to be risk-adjusted, should they be ex ante or ex post rates of return? (3) What is the right price deflator for the output of financial firms? Is it just the general price index? (4) When--if ever--should we count capital gains of financial firms as part of financial service output?</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w14616</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2008-12, p.14616
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1689307311
source ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bond markets
Central banks
Economic theory
Equilibrium
Federal Reserve monetary policy
Financial services
Interest income
Interest rates
National income and product accounts
NIPA
Opportunity costs
Productivity measurement
Risk premiums
Stockholders
Value added
title A General-Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Approach to the Measurement of Nominal and Real Bank Output
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20General-Equilibrium%20Asset-Pricing%20Approach%20to%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Nominal%20and%20Real%20Bank%20Output&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Wang,%20J%20Christina&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.spage=14616&rft.pages=14616-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w14616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3717101891%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-fc4e52e34d8ec417bb766617cba4c827146114e92aa09234dddcad38ceb2fb063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1689307311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true