Loading…

Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function

Compensatory strategies have evolved in birds to minimize the effects of poor rearing conditions on future survival and fitness. Undernourished nestlings may accelerate growth and/or development relative to age, termed compensatory growth, to achieve normal asymptotic size at the same time as well-f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Auk 2014-07, Vol.131 (3), p.396-406
Main Authors: Killpack, Tess L, Tie, Dan Nan, Karasov, William H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3
container_end_page 406
container_issue 3
container_start_page 396
container_title The Auk
container_volume 131
creator Killpack, Tess L
Tie, Dan Nan
Karasov, William H
description Compensatory strategies have evolved in birds to minimize the effects of poor rearing conditions on future survival and fitness. Undernourished nestlings may accelerate growth and/or development relative to age, termed compensatory growth, to achieve normal asymptotic size at the same time as well-fed chicks. While compensatory growth allows birds to fledge at a suitable size and time, it may have persistent detrimental effects on the development of complex body systems. Our study examined compensatory growth following short-term food restriction of caged groups of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata; adult breeding pair and their brood) during the nestling period, and tested for postrestriction effects on tissue maturity (indexed by body tissue water content) and adaptive immune function. Food restriction reduced nestling body mass, tarsus, and culmen growth. Rapid compensatory growth in body mass, but not in tarsus and culmen lengths, was observed upon return to ad libitum feeding of the food-restricted group. Nestlings that were raised in food-restricted treatment cages showed no significant difference in adaptive antibody response to a model antigen compared with those raised in control cages with ad libitum feeding. Reductions in tissue maturity were observed in nestlings that experienced food restriction, indicating a decoupling of chronological age and physiological age. These data provide evidence of capacity for rapid, compensatory body mass growth in nestling Zebra Finches, and suggest that the energetic costs of body growth and development are relatively larger than the costs of development of the humoral immune system.
doi_str_mv 10.1642/AUK-14-1.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1690677352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90008555</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90008555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EFr2zAUB3AxOlia7rL7mGCXUnCrZ0u2fCyhWUsLO3S57CIkWUoUGsmV5I18-ym47NjTQ7yf3uP9EfoC5BpaWt_cbh4roBVcwwe0gL7hFa0ZPUMLQgitOGn4J3Se0r48GeH9Am1X4TAan2QO8Yi3MfzNO-w89iblF-e3-LdRUeK183pnEnaHUeqcsArDEevyNSSXXfBYTRn7kLEc5JjdH1PkYfIG28nrE7hAH618SebzW12izfru1-q-evr542F1-1SppqO56q0hVtetoryzVBnFBtJxBrYedM8JU52mTEvLQFICg2kslaAGpqkeeENMs0Tf57ljDK9TOULswxR9WSmg7UnbdQ2ri7qalY4hpWisGKM7yHgUQMQpSFGCFEAFCCj464z3qYT0X_YlQ84YK_1vc9_KIOQ2uiQ2zzWBlhDgNe1O4nIWyoXgzXvL_gFiH4ex</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690677352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function</title><source>JSTOR-E-Journals</source><creator>Killpack, Tess L ; Tie, Dan Nan ; Karasov, William H</creator><creatorcontrib>Killpack, Tess L ; Tie, Dan Nan ; Karasov, William H</creatorcontrib><description>Compensatory strategies have evolved in birds to minimize the effects of poor rearing conditions on future survival and fitness. Undernourished nestlings may accelerate growth and/or development relative to age, termed compensatory growth, to achieve normal asymptotic size at the same time as well-fed chicks. While compensatory growth allows birds to fledge at a suitable size and time, it may have persistent detrimental effects on the development of complex body systems. Our study examined compensatory growth following short-term food restriction of caged groups of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata; adult breeding pair and their brood) during the nestling period, and tested for postrestriction effects on tissue maturity (indexed by body tissue water content) and adaptive immune function. Food restriction reduced nestling body mass, tarsus, and culmen growth. Rapid compensatory growth in body mass, but not in tarsus and culmen lengths, was observed upon return to ad libitum feeding of the food-restricted group. Nestlings that were raised in food-restricted treatment cages showed no significant difference in adaptive antibody response to a model antigen compared with those raised in control cages with ad libitum feeding. Reductions in tissue maturity were observed in nestlings that experienced food restriction, indicating a decoupling of chronological age and physiological age. These data provide evidence of capacity for rapid, compensatory body mass growth in nestling Zebra Finches, and suggest that the energetic costs of body growth and development are relatively larger than the costs of development of the humoral immune system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1642/AUK-14-1.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><subject>ad libitum feeding ; adults ; Animal behavior ; antibodies ; antibody ; antigens ; BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; body composition ; breeding ; cages ; catch-up growth ; chicks ; Compensatory growth ; Developmental biology ; developmental plasticity ; Finches ; fledglings ; Food ; Food consumption ; food restriction ; Immune response ; Immune system ; keyhole limpet hemocyanin ; malnutrition ; Mass ; nestlings ; Ornithology ; rearing ; Taeniopygia guttata ; Tarsus ; tissue maturity ; Tissues ; Water content ; Zebras</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 2014-07, Vol.131 (3), p.396-406</ispartof><rights>2014 American Ornithologists’ Union</rights><rights>Copyright Ornithological Societies of North America Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90008555$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90008555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Killpack, Tess L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tie, Dan Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasov, William H</creatorcontrib><title>Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function</title><title>The Auk</title><description>Compensatory strategies have evolved in birds to minimize the effects of poor rearing conditions on future survival and fitness. Undernourished nestlings may accelerate growth and/or development relative to age, termed compensatory growth, to achieve normal asymptotic size at the same time as well-fed chicks. While compensatory growth allows birds to fledge at a suitable size and time, it may have persistent detrimental effects on the development of complex body systems. Our study examined compensatory growth following short-term food restriction of caged groups of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata; adult breeding pair and their brood) during the nestling period, and tested for postrestriction effects on tissue maturity (indexed by body tissue water content) and adaptive immune function. Food restriction reduced nestling body mass, tarsus, and culmen growth. Rapid compensatory growth in body mass, but not in tarsus and culmen lengths, was observed upon return to ad libitum feeding of the food-restricted group. Nestlings that were raised in food-restricted treatment cages showed no significant difference in adaptive antibody response to a model antigen compared with those raised in control cages with ad libitum feeding. Reductions in tissue maturity were observed in nestlings that experienced food restriction, indicating a decoupling of chronological age and physiological age. These data provide evidence of capacity for rapid, compensatory body mass growth in nestling Zebra Finches, and suggest that the energetic costs of body growth and development are relatively larger than the costs of development of the humoral immune system.</description><subject>ad libitum feeding</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>antibody</subject><subject>antigens</subject><subject>BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>body composition</subject><subject>breeding</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>catch-up growth</subject><subject>chicks</subject><subject>Compensatory growth</subject><subject>Developmental biology</subject><subject>developmental plasticity</subject><subject>Finches</subject><subject>fledglings</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>food restriction</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>keyhole limpet hemocyanin</subject><subject>malnutrition</subject><subject>Mass</subject><subject>nestlings</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>rearing</subject><subject>Taeniopygia guttata</subject><subject>Tarsus</subject><subject>tissue maturity</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Zebras</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EFr2zAUB3AxOlia7rL7mGCXUnCrZ0u2fCyhWUsLO3S57CIkWUoUGsmV5I18-ym47NjTQ7yf3uP9EfoC5BpaWt_cbh4roBVcwwe0gL7hFa0ZPUMLQgitOGn4J3Se0r48GeH9Am1X4TAan2QO8Yi3MfzNO-w89iblF-e3-LdRUeK183pnEnaHUeqcsArDEevyNSSXXfBYTRn7kLEc5JjdH1PkYfIG28nrE7hAH618SebzW12izfru1-q-evr542F1-1SppqO56q0hVtetoryzVBnFBtJxBrYedM8JU52mTEvLQFICg2kslaAGpqkeeENMs0Tf57ljDK9TOULswxR9WSmg7UnbdQ2ri7qalY4hpWisGKM7yHgUQMQpSFGCFEAFCCj464z3qYT0X_YlQ84YK_1vc9_KIOQ2uiQ2zzWBlhDgNe1O4nIWyoXgzXvL_gFiH4ex</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Killpack, Tess L</creator><creator>Tie, Dan Nan</creator><creator>Karasov, William H</creator><general>The American Ornithologists' Union</general><general>American Ornithologists’ Union</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function</title><author>Killpack, Tess L ; Tie, Dan Nan ; Karasov, William H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ad libitum feeding</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>antibody</topic><topic>antigens</topic><topic>BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>body composition</topic><topic>breeding</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>catch-up growth</topic><topic>chicks</topic><topic>Compensatory growth</topic><topic>Developmental biology</topic><topic>developmental plasticity</topic><topic>Finches</topic><topic>fledglings</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>food restriction</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>keyhole limpet hemocyanin</topic><topic>malnutrition</topic><topic>Mass</topic><topic>nestlings</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>rearing</topic><topic>Taeniopygia guttata</topic><topic>Tarsus</topic><topic>tissue maturity</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Zebras</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Killpack, Tess L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tie, Dan Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasov, William H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Killpack, Tess L</au><au>Tie, Dan Nan</au><au>Karasov, William H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>396</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>396-406</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><abstract>Compensatory strategies have evolved in birds to minimize the effects of poor rearing conditions on future survival and fitness. Undernourished nestlings may accelerate growth and/or development relative to age, termed compensatory growth, to achieve normal asymptotic size at the same time as well-fed chicks. While compensatory growth allows birds to fledge at a suitable size and time, it may have persistent detrimental effects on the development of complex body systems. Our study examined compensatory growth following short-term food restriction of caged groups of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata; adult breeding pair and their brood) during the nestling period, and tested for postrestriction effects on tissue maturity (indexed by body tissue water content) and adaptive immune function. Food restriction reduced nestling body mass, tarsus, and culmen growth. Rapid compensatory growth in body mass, but not in tarsus and culmen lengths, was observed upon return to ad libitum feeding of the food-restricted group. Nestlings that were raised in food-restricted treatment cages showed no significant difference in adaptive antibody response to a model antigen compared with those raised in control cages with ad libitum feeding. Reductions in tissue maturity were observed in nestlings that experienced food restriction, indicating a decoupling of chronological age and physiological age. These data provide evidence of capacity for rapid, compensatory body mass growth in nestling Zebra Finches, and suggest that the energetic costs of body growth and development are relatively larger than the costs of development of the humoral immune system.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>The American Ornithologists' Union</pub><doi>10.1642/AUK-14-1.1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8038
ispartof The Auk, 2014-07, Vol.131 (3), p.396-406
issn 0004-8038
1938-4254
1938-4254
2732-4613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1690677352
source JSTOR-E-Journals
subjects ad libitum feeding
adults
Animal behavior
antibodies
antibody
antigens
BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY
Bird nesting
Birds
body composition
breeding
cages
catch-up growth
chicks
Compensatory growth
Developmental biology
developmental plasticity
Finches
fledglings
Food
Food consumption
food restriction
Immune response
Immune system
keyhole limpet hemocyanin
malnutrition
Mass
nestlings
Ornithology
rearing
Taeniopygia guttata
Tarsus
tissue maturity
Tissues
Water content
Zebras
title Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compensatory%20growth%20in%20nestling%20Zebra%20Finches%20impacts%20body%20composition%20but%20not%20adaptive%20immune%20function&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Killpack,%20Tess%20L&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=396-406&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1642/AUK-14-1.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90008555%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-9fe0fc26b487f4beb5d07851f2dc9805b7c45caf51a401de3f4a1bd5c4cd830e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690677352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90008555&rfr_iscdi=true