Loading…

Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events

Slips, trips and an induced loss of balance have been identified as the major causative factor for workplace injuries involving falls. Moreover, alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places, especially with the usage of crocs in slip prone hospital sett...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of industrial ergonomics 2015-07, Vol.48, p.158-166
Main Authors: Chander, Harish, Garner, John C., Wade, Chip
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3
container_end_page 166
container_issue
container_start_page 158
container_title International journal of industrial ergonomics
container_volume 48
creator Chander, Harish
Garner, John C.
Wade, Chip
description Slips, trips and an induced loss of balance have been identified as the major causative factor for workplace injuries involving falls. Moreover, alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places, especially with the usage of crocs in slip prone hospital settings. The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of alternative footwear [crocs (CC), flip-flops (FF)] and industry standard slip resistant shoes (LT) on heel dynamics during slip events. Eighteen healthy male participants following a repeated measures design for each footwear condition, were tested for heel kinematics during normal dry surface gait (NG); unexpected slip (US), alert slip (AS) and expected slip (ES). A 3×4 repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dependent slip parameters (heel slip distance-HSD & mean heel slip velocity-MHSV) at p = 0.05. Significant interactions between footwear and gait trials were found for HSD & MHSV, with significantly greater slip parameters exhibited by CC & FF compared to LT during US. Alternative footwear (CC & FF) demonstrated greater slips, but were limited to slip events that were unexpected. With the knowledge and anticipation of slippery flooring conditions, participants were able to lower the slip parameters by kinematically modifying heel contact dynamics. The LT had significantly lower slip parameters and maintained a normal gait pattern for all slip trials, and demonstrates to be the choice of footwear for maneuvering slippery flooring conditions; while alternative footwear combined with unexpected slip events contributed to potentially hazardous and hazardous slips. Alternative footwear such as crocs are widely used in hospitals which are slip prone environments. This study provides evidence that these alternative footwear may predispose to hazardous slips and recommends the use of slip resistant footwear or slip resistant modifications to alternative footwear under known or unknown slippery conditions. •Crocs and flip flops demonstrated greater slip distance and velocity in slip trials.•The slip parameters of alternative footwear were greater in unexpected slips.•Knowledge and anticipation of slippery environment lowered slip parameters.•Low top slip resistant shoe had better performance in all slip trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1696478222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169814115000748</els_id><sourcerecordid>3744031851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKufwEvA865J9k-Tg6AUtULBi55DNvtSsmyTmqQr_fam1rMw8C7zG94MQreUlJTQ9n4oIWy8KxmhTUmyiDhDM8oXrOCMinM0yy5RcFrTS3QV40AIXZCGztDjCmDE2rukdML9wamt1RFbh9WYIDiV7ATYeJ--QQXc74N1GxxHu8MwgUvxGl0YNUa4-btz9Pny_LFcFev317fl07rQFW9S0VZacOioaLtKqLrRpmtYV_WKtw0XXJmetYzWHdeirhg0mhhiTNd2lPWcUKjm6O6Uuwv-aw8xycHv839jlLlaWy84Yyy7qpNLBx9jACN3wW5VOEhK5HEqOcjfqeRxKkmyiMjUw4mCXGCyEGTUFpyG3gbQSfbe_sv_AHaacyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696478222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Chander, Harish ; Garner, John C. ; Wade, Chip</creator><creatorcontrib>Chander, Harish ; Garner, John C. ; Wade, Chip</creatorcontrib><description>Slips, trips and an induced loss of balance have been identified as the major causative factor for workplace injuries involving falls. Moreover, alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places, especially with the usage of crocs in slip prone hospital settings. The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of alternative footwear [crocs (CC), flip-flops (FF)] and industry standard slip resistant shoes (LT) on heel dynamics during slip events. Eighteen healthy male participants following a repeated measures design for each footwear condition, were tested for heel kinematics during normal dry surface gait (NG); unexpected slip (US), alert slip (AS) and expected slip (ES). A 3×4 repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dependent slip parameters (heel slip distance-HSD &amp; mean heel slip velocity-MHSV) at p = 0.05. Significant interactions between footwear and gait trials were found for HSD &amp; MHSV, with significantly greater slip parameters exhibited by CC &amp; FF compared to LT during US. Alternative footwear (CC &amp; FF) demonstrated greater slips, but were limited to slip events that were unexpected. With the knowledge and anticipation of slippery flooring conditions, participants were able to lower the slip parameters by kinematically modifying heel contact dynamics. The LT had significantly lower slip parameters and maintained a normal gait pattern for all slip trials, and demonstrates to be the choice of footwear for maneuvering slippery flooring conditions; while alternative footwear combined with unexpected slip events contributed to potentially hazardous and hazardous slips. Alternative footwear such as crocs are widely used in hospitals which are slip prone environments. This study provides evidence that these alternative footwear may predispose to hazardous slips and recommends the use of slip resistant footwear or slip resistant modifications to alternative footwear under known or unknown slippery conditions. •Crocs and flip flops demonstrated greater slip distance and velocity in slip trials.•The slip parameters of alternative footwear were greater in unexpected slips.•Knowledge and anticipation of slippery environment lowered slip parameters.•Low top slip resistant shoe had better performance in all slip trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-8141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Alternative footwear ; Falls ; Feet ; Flooring ; Footwear ; Kinematics ; Perception of slipperiness ; Slips ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2015-07, Vol.48, p.158-166</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chander, Harish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, Chip</creatorcontrib><title>Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events</title><title>International journal of industrial ergonomics</title><description>Slips, trips and an induced loss of balance have been identified as the major causative factor for workplace injuries involving falls. Moreover, alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places, especially with the usage of crocs in slip prone hospital settings. The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of alternative footwear [crocs (CC), flip-flops (FF)] and industry standard slip resistant shoes (LT) on heel dynamics during slip events. Eighteen healthy male participants following a repeated measures design for each footwear condition, were tested for heel kinematics during normal dry surface gait (NG); unexpected slip (US), alert slip (AS) and expected slip (ES). A 3×4 repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dependent slip parameters (heel slip distance-HSD &amp; mean heel slip velocity-MHSV) at p = 0.05. Significant interactions between footwear and gait trials were found for HSD &amp; MHSV, with significantly greater slip parameters exhibited by CC &amp; FF compared to LT during US. Alternative footwear (CC &amp; FF) demonstrated greater slips, but were limited to slip events that were unexpected. With the knowledge and anticipation of slippery flooring conditions, participants were able to lower the slip parameters by kinematically modifying heel contact dynamics. The LT had significantly lower slip parameters and maintained a normal gait pattern for all slip trials, and demonstrates to be the choice of footwear for maneuvering slippery flooring conditions; while alternative footwear combined with unexpected slip events contributed to potentially hazardous and hazardous slips. Alternative footwear such as crocs are widely used in hospitals which are slip prone environments. This study provides evidence that these alternative footwear may predispose to hazardous slips and recommends the use of slip resistant footwear or slip resistant modifications to alternative footwear under known or unknown slippery conditions. •Crocs and flip flops demonstrated greater slip distance and velocity in slip trials.•The slip parameters of alternative footwear were greater in unexpected slips.•Knowledge and anticipation of slippery environment lowered slip parameters.•Low top slip resistant shoe had better performance in all slip trials.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Alternative footwear</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Footwear</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Perception of slipperiness</subject><subject>Slips</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0169-8141</issn><issn>1872-8219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKufwEvA865J9k-Tg6AUtULBi55DNvtSsmyTmqQr_fam1rMw8C7zG94MQreUlJTQ9n4oIWy8KxmhTUmyiDhDM8oXrOCMinM0yy5RcFrTS3QV40AIXZCGztDjCmDE2rukdML9wamt1RFbh9WYIDiV7ATYeJ--QQXc74N1GxxHu8MwgUvxGl0YNUa4-btz9Pny_LFcFev317fl07rQFW9S0VZacOioaLtKqLrRpmtYV_WKtw0XXJmetYzWHdeirhg0mhhiTNd2lPWcUKjm6O6Uuwv-aw8xycHv839jlLlaWy84Yyy7qpNLBx9jACN3wW5VOEhK5HEqOcjfqeRxKkmyiMjUw4mCXGCyEGTUFpyG3gbQSfbe_sv_AHaacyU</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Chander, Harish</creator><creator>Garner, John C.</creator><creator>Wade, Chip</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events</title><author>Chander, Harish ; Garner, John C. ; Wade, Chip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Alternative footwear</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Footwear</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Perception of slipperiness</topic><topic>Slips</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chander, Harish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wade, Chip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of industrial ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chander, Harish</au><au>Garner, John C.</au><au>Wade, Chip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events</atitle><jtitle>International journal of industrial ergonomics</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>158</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>158-166</pages><issn>0169-8141</issn><eissn>1872-8219</eissn><abstract>Slips, trips and an induced loss of balance have been identified as the major causative factor for workplace injuries involving falls. Moreover, alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places, especially with the usage of crocs in slip prone hospital settings. The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of alternative footwear [crocs (CC), flip-flops (FF)] and industry standard slip resistant shoes (LT) on heel dynamics during slip events. Eighteen healthy male participants following a repeated measures design for each footwear condition, were tested for heel kinematics during normal dry surface gait (NG); unexpected slip (US), alert slip (AS) and expected slip (ES). A 3×4 repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dependent slip parameters (heel slip distance-HSD &amp; mean heel slip velocity-MHSV) at p = 0.05. Significant interactions between footwear and gait trials were found for HSD &amp; MHSV, with significantly greater slip parameters exhibited by CC &amp; FF compared to LT during US. Alternative footwear (CC &amp; FF) demonstrated greater slips, but were limited to slip events that were unexpected. With the knowledge and anticipation of slippery flooring conditions, participants were able to lower the slip parameters by kinematically modifying heel contact dynamics. The LT had significantly lower slip parameters and maintained a normal gait pattern for all slip trials, and demonstrates to be the choice of footwear for maneuvering slippery flooring conditions; while alternative footwear combined with unexpected slip events contributed to potentially hazardous and hazardous slips. Alternative footwear such as crocs are widely used in hospitals which are slip prone environments. This study provides evidence that these alternative footwear may predispose to hazardous slips and recommends the use of slip resistant footwear or slip resistant modifications to alternative footwear under known or unknown slippery conditions. •Crocs and flip flops demonstrated greater slip distance and velocity in slip trials.•The slip parameters of alternative footwear were greater in unexpected slips.•Knowledge and anticipation of slippery environment lowered slip parameters.•Low top slip resistant shoe had better performance in all slip trials.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.009</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-8141
ispartof International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2015-07, Vol.48, p.158-166
issn 0169-8141
1872-8219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1696478222
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Accidents
Alternative footwear
Falls
Feet
Flooring
Footwear
Kinematics
Perception of slipperiness
Slips
Variance analysis
title Heel contact dynamics in alternative footwear during slip events
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heel%20contact%20dynamics%20in%20alternative%20footwear%20during%20slip%20events&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20industrial%20ergonomics&rft.au=Chander,%20Harish&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=158-166&rft.issn=0169-8141&rft.eissn=1872-8219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3744031851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-63c98eb196b39a45cfb52b3da865898afd26214b8c9432e5c0f0ffb6b12d801e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696478222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true