Loading…

Vent burst pressure effects on vented gas explosion reduced pressure

The overpressure generated in a 10 L cylindrical vented vessel with an L/D of 2.8 was investigated, with end ignition opposite the vent, as a function of the vent static burst pressure, Pstat, from 35 to 450 mb. Three different Kv (V2/3/Av) of 3.6, 7.2 and 21.7 were investigated for 10% methane–air...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2015-07, Vol.36, p.429-438
Main Authors: Fakandu, Bala M., Andrews, Gordon E., Phylaktou, Herodotus N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The overpressure generated in a 10 L cylindrical vented vessel with an L/D of 2.8 was investigated, with end ignition opposite the vent, as a function of the vent static burst pressure, Pstat, from 35 to 450 mb. Three different Kv (V2/3/Av) of 3.6, 7.2 and 21.7 were investigated for 10% methane–air and 7.5% ethylene–air. It was shown that the dynamic burst pressure, Pburst, was higher than Pstat with a proportionality constant of 1.37. For 10% methane–air Pburst was the controlling peak pressure for K  Pburst in the literature and in EU and US standards. For higher Kv the overpressure due to flow through the vent, Pfv, was the dominant overpressure and the static burst pressure was not additive to the external overpressure. Literature on the influence of Pstat at low Kv was shown to support the present finding and it is recommended that the influence of Pstat in gas venting standards is revised. •Influence of static burst pressure for different vent cover materials investigated.•The work carried out in a 10 L cylindrical vessel with L/D = 2.8.•Four Kv (V2/3/Av) of 3.6, 5.4, 10.9, and 21.7 for 10% methane–air were considered.•It is impossible for practical vent covers for Pstat < Pred at low Kv.•This work shows some contradictions to the assumption of the venting standards.
ISSN:0950-4230
1873-3352
DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.02.005