Originalism as a theory of legal change

Originalism is usually called a theory of interpretation, a particular way to read a text. Best understood, though, originalism is much more than that. It's a theory of the law: a particular way to understand where our law comes from, what it requires, and how it can be changed. This view start...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Harvard journal of law and public policy 2015-06, Vol.38 (3), p.817
Main Author: Sachs, Stephen E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Attorneys
Constitutional interpretation
Constitutional law
Evaluation
Legal arguments
Legal positivism
Original intent (Law)
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 817
container_title Harvard journal of law and public policy
container_volume 38
creator Sachs, Stephen E
description Originalism is usually called a theory of interpretation, a particular way to read a text. Best understood, though, originalism is much more than that. It's a theory of the law: a particular way to understand where our law comes from, what it requires, and how it can be changed. This view starts with a common assumption of legal systems, that the law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. Originalism as adherence to the Founders' law is complicated and simple at the same time. It's extremely complicated, because people have to know the content of the Founders' law in its full glory -- interpretive rules, context, rules of change, and so on. But it's also very simple, because it makes the basis for originalism very easy to understand: our law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. That ought to be the originalist's slogan, because originalism is a theory of legal change.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1697222838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A419267032</galeid><sourcerecordid>A419267032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-93ec851e83f39c4c70f44babaeb39908a15f90bcc7b5ff2859e076cb328392533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzt9LwzAQB_AgCs7p_1DwQQQraX40yeMYug0Ge9HnksRLltG12qSg_72BCW4wDu7g-HyPu0ATQgUray7IJZrgStGSSUGu0U2MO4wxY5WcoIfNEHzodBvivtCx0EXaQj_8FL0rWvC6LexWdx5u0ZXTbYS7vzlF768vb_Nlud4sVvPZuvSUq1QqClbyCiR1VFlmBXaMGW00GKoUlrriTmFjrTDcOSK5AixqayiRVBFO6RTdH-5-Dv3XCDE1u34c8n-xqWolCMlQ_qv8IDShc30atN2HaJsZqxSpBaYkq_KM8tDBoNu-Axfy-sQ_n_G5PmAf7NnA40kgmwTfyesxxma1XJ3apyNrxhg6iLnF4LcpHiJH_BftqIQx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697222838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Originalism as a theory of legal change</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Sachs, Stephen E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Stephen E</creatorcontrib><description>Originalism is usually called a theory of interpretation, a particular way to read a text. Best understood, though, originalism is much more than that. It's a theory of the law: a particular way to understand where our law comes from, what it requires, and how it can be changed. This view starts with a common assumption of legal systems, that the law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. Originalism as adherence to the Founders' law is complicated and simple at the same time. It's extremely complicated, because people have to know the content of the Founders' law in its full glory -- interpretive rules, context, rules of change, and so on. But it's also very simple, because it makes the basis for originalism very easy to understand: our law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. That ought to be the originalist's slogan, because originalism is a theory of legal change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-4872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-6572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Attorneys ; Constitutional interpretation ; Constitutional law ; Evaluation ; Legal arguments ; Legal positivism ; Original intent (Law)</subject><ispartof>Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2015-06, Vol.38 (3), p.817</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1697222838?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21376,21387,21394,27866,33611,33769,33985,36060,43733,43814,43948,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Stephen E</creatorcontrib><title>Originalism as a theory of legal change</title><title>Harvard journal of law and public policy</title><description>Originalism is usually called a theory of interpretation, a particular way to read a text. Best understood, though, originalism is much more than that. It's a theory of the law: a particular way to understand where our law comes from, what it requires, and how it can be changed. This view starts with a common assumption of legal systems, that the law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. Originalism as adherence to the Founders' law is complicated and simple at the same time. It's extremely complicated, because people have to know the content of the Founders' law in its full glory -- interpretive rules, context, rules of change, and so on. But it's also very simple, because it makes the basis for originalism very easy to understand: our law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. That ought to be the originalist's slogan, because originalism is a theory of legal change.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Constitutional interpretation</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Legal arguments</subject><subject>Legal positivism</subject><subject>Original intent (Law)</subject><issn>0193-4872</issn><issn>2374-6572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNptzt9LwzAQB_AgCs7p_1DwQQQraX40yeMYug0Ge9HnksRLltG12qSg_72BCW4wDu7g-HyPu0ATQgUray7IJZrgStGSSUGu0U2MO4wxY5WcoIfNEHzodBvivtCx0EXaQj_8FL0rWvC6LexWdx5u0ZXTbYS7vzlF768vb_Nlud4sVvPZuvSUq1QqClbyCiR1VFlmBXaMGW00GKoUlrriTmFjrTDcOSK5AixqayiRVBFO6RTdH-5-Dv3XCDE1u34c8n-xqWolCMlQ_qv8IDShc30atN2HaJsZqxSpBaYkq_KM8tDBoNu-Axfy-sQ_n_G5PmAf7NnA40kgmwTfyesxxma1XJ3apyNrxhg6iLnF4LcpHiJH_BftqIQx</recordid><startdate>20150622</startdate><enddate>20150622</enddate><creator>Sachs, Stephen E</creator><general>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</general><general>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150622</creationdate><title>Originalism as a theory of legal change</title><author>Sachs, Stephen E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-93ec851e83f39c4c70f44babaeb39908a15f90bcc7b5ff2859e076cb328392533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Constitutional interpretation</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Legal arguments</topic><topic>Legal positivism</topic><topic>Original intent (Law)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Stephen E</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale_Business Insights: Global</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachs, Stephen E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Originalism as a theory of legal change</atitle><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle><date>2015-06-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>817</spage><pages>817-</pages><issn>0193-4872</issn><eissn>2374-6572</eissn><abstract>Originalism is usually called a theory of interpretation, a particular way to read a text. Best understood, though, originalism is much more than that. It's a theory of the law: a particular way to understand where our law comes from, what it requires, and how it can be changed. This view starts with a common assumption of legal systems, that the law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. Originalism as adherence to the Founders' law is complicated and simple at the same time. It's extremely complicated, because people have to know the content of the Founders' law in its full glory -- interpretive rules, context, rules of change, and so on. But it's also very simple, because it makes the basis for originalism very easy to understand: our law stays the same until it's lawfully changed. That ought to be the originalist's slogan, because originalism is a theory of legal change.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</pub><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0193-4872
ispartof Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2015-06, Vol.38 (3), p.817
issn 0193-4872
2374-6572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1697222838
source Criminology Collection; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PAIS Index
subjects Analysis
Attorneys
Constitutional interpretation
Constitutional law
Evaluation
Legal arguments
Legal positivism
Original intent (Law)
title Originalism as a theory of legal change
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A58%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Originalism%20as%20a%20theory%20of%20legal%20change&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Sachs,%20Stephen%20E&rft.date=2015-06-22&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=817&rft.pages=817-&rft.issn=0193-4872&rft.eissn=2374-6572&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA419267032%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-93ec851e83f39c4c70f44babaeb39908a15f90bcc7b5ff2859e076cb328392533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697222838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A419267032&rfr_iscdi=true