Loading…
The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies
Multimedia learning research has established several principles for the effective design of audiovisual instruction. The image principle suggests that showing the instructor's face in multimedia instruction does not promote learning, because the potential benefits from inducing social responses...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of educational psychology 2015-08, Vol.107 (3), p.724-739 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-2de77f25859245ce091def8dccc2c899ce6b4f44adf1d79350f06fe0710ea2ba3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 739 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 724 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Kizilcec, René F. Bailenson, Jeremy N. Gomez, Charles J. |
description | Multimedia learning research has established several principles for the effective design of audiovisual instruction. The image principle suggests that showing the instructor's face in multimedia instruction does not promote learning, because the potential benefits from inducing social responses are outweighed by the cost of additional cognitive processing. In an 8-week observational field study (N = 2,951), online learners chose to watch video lectures either with or without the instructor's face. Although learners who saw the face reported having a better lecture experience than those who chose not to see the face, 35% watched videos without the face for self-reported reasons including avoiding distraction. Building on these insights, the authors developed a video presentation style that strategically shows the face to reduce distraction while preserving occasional social cues. A 10-week field experiment (N = 12,468) compared the constant with the strategic presentation of the face and provided evidence consistent with the image principle. Cognitive load and perceived social presence were higher in the strategic than in the constant condition, but learning outcomes and attrition did not differ. Learners who expressed a verbal learning preference experienced substantially lower attrition and cognitive load with the constant than the strategic presentation. The findings highlight the value of social cues for motivation and caution against one-size-fits-all approaches to instructional design that fail to account for individual differences in multimedia instruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/edu0000013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1703935635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1071516</ericid><sourcerecordid>1666305086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-2de77f25859245ce091def8dccc2c899ce6b4f44adf1d79350f06fe0710ea2ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMoOKcX70LBgyBW86NNWm8yNp0MPGzqMWTJN9rRtTVplf33plT05vcSvu998hIeQqcEXxPMxA2YDvdD2B4akZzlMSWC76MRxpTGmHN2iI683wSEhWWEXlfvEM0r37pOt7W78NFMaYiKKnopDNS_VlFXt9H0M2hVsGeu3karrzpaKPcG8VKrMogFlCZatp0pwB-jA6tKDyc_5xg9z6aryUO8eLqfT-4WsUoIb2NqQAhL0yzNaZJqwDkxYDOjtaY6y3MNfJ3YJFHGEiNylmKLuQUsCAZF14qN0fmQ27j6owPfyk3duSo8KYnALNzgLP2X4qEHnOKMB-pyoLSrvXdgZeOKrXI7SbDs65V_9Qb4bIDBFfoXnD6S8LeU9GFXg68aJRu_08q1hS7B6845qNo-K4QKyaSgCfsGcBaEuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1666305086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Kizilcec, René F. ; Bailenson, Jeremy N. ; Gomez, Charles J.</creator><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kizilcec, René F. ; Bailenson, Jeremy N. ; Gomez, Charles J. ; Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Multimedia learning research has established several principles for the effective design of audiovisual instruction. The image principle suggests that showing the instructor's face in multimedia instruction does not promote learning, because the potential benefits from inducing social responses are outweighed by the cost of additional cognitive processing. In an 8-week observational field study (N = 2,951), online learners chose to watch video lectures either with or without the instructor's face. Although learners who saw the face reported having a better lecture experience than those who chose not to see the face, 35% watched videos without the face for self-reported reasons including avoiding distraction. Building on these insights, the authors developed a video presentation style that strategically shows the face to reduce distraction while preserving occasional social cues. A 10-week field experiment (N = 12,468) compared the constant with the strategic presentation of the face and provided evidence consistent with the image principle. Cognitive load and perceived social presence were higher in the strategic than in the constant condition, but learning outcomes and attrition did not differ. Learners who expressed a verbal learning preference experienced substantially lower attrition and cognitive load with the constant than the strategic presentation. The findings highlight the value of social cues for motivation and caution against one-size-fits-all approaches to instructional design that fail to account for individual differences in multimedia instruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult Learning ; Audiovisual Instruction ; Cognition ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive Style ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Cues ; Difficulty Level ; Distance Education ; Educational psychology ; Electronic Courses ; Face Perception ; Female ; Field Studies ; Field study ; Human ; Human Body ; Human Channel Capacity ; Instructional design ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Massive Open Online Courses ; Multimedia ; Multimedia Instruction ; Observation ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; Preferences ; Student Attrition ; Teaching methods ; Verbal learning ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2015-08, Vol.107 (3), p.724-739</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-2de77f25859245ce091def8dccc2c899ce6b4f44adf1d79350f06fe0710ea2ba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1071516$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kizilcec, René F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailenson, Jeremy N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>Multimedia learning research has established several principles for the effective design of audiovisual instruction. The image principle suggests that showing the instructor's face in multimedia instruction does not promote learning, because the potential benefits from inducing social responses are outweighed by the cost of additional cognitive processing. In an 8-week observational field study (N = 2,951), online learners chose to watch video lectures either with or without the instructor's face. Although learners who saw the face reported having a better lecture experience than those who chose not to see the face, 35% watched videos without the face for self-reported reasons including avoiding distraction. Building on these insights, the authors developed a video presentation style that strategically shows the face to reduce distraction while preserving occasional social cues. A 10-week field experiment (N = 12,468) compared the constant with the strategic presentation of the face and provided evidence consistent with the image principle. Cognitive load and perceived social presence were higher in the strategic than in the constant condition, but learning outcomes and attrition did not differ. Learners who expressed a verbal learning preference experienced substantially lower attrition and cognitive load with the constant than the strategic presentation. The findings highlight the value of social cues for motivation and caution against one-size-fits-all approaches to instructional design that fail to account for individual differences in multimedia instruction.</description><subject>Adult Learning</subject><subject>Audiovisual Instruction</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Electronic Courses</subject><subject>Face Perception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Field Studies</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Human Channel Capacity</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Massive Open Online Courses</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Multimedia Instruction</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Student Attrition</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Verbal learning</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMoOKcX70LBgyBW86NNWm8yNp0MPGzqMWTJN9rRtTVplf33plT05vcSvu998hIeQqcEXxPMxA2YDvdD2B4akZzlMSWC76MRxpTGmHN2iI683wSEhWWEXlfvEM0r37pOt7W78NFMaYiKKnopDNS_VlFXt9H0M2hVsGeu3karrzpaKPcG8VKrMogFlCZatp0pwB-jA6tKDyc_5xg9z6aryUO8eLqfT-4WsUoIb2NqQAhL0yzNaZJqwDkxYDOjtaY6y3MNfJ3YJFHGEiNylmKLuQUsCAZF14qN0fmQ27j6owPfyk3duSo8KYnALNzgLP2X4qEHnOKMB-pyoLSrvXdgZeOKrXI7SbDs65V_9Qb4bIDBFfoXnD6S8LeU9GFXg68aJRu_08q1hS7B6845qNo-K4QKyaSgCfsGcBaEuQ</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Kizilcec, René F.</creator><creator>Bailenson, Jeremy N.</creator><creator>Gomez, Charles J.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies</title><author>Kizilcec, René F. ; Bailenson, Jeremy N. ; Gomez, Charles J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-2de77f25859245ce091def8dccc2c899ce6b4f44adf1d79350f06fe0710ea2ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult Learning</topic><topic>Audiovisual Instruction</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Electronic Courses</topic><topic>Face Perception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Field Studies</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Human Channel Capacity</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Massive Open Online Courses</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Multimedia Instruction</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Student Attrition</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Verbal learning</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kizilcec, René F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailenson, Jeremy N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kizilcec, René F.</au><au>Bailenson, Jeremy N.</au><au>Gomez, Charles J.</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1071516</ericid><atitle>The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>724-739</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPAS</coden><abstract>Multimedia learning research has established several principles for the effective design of audiovisual instruction. The image principle suggests that showing the instructor's face in multimedia instruction does not promote learning, because the potential benefits from inducing social responses are outweighed by the cost of additional cognitive processing. In an 8-week observational field study (N = 2,951), online learners chose to watch video lectures either with or without the instructor's face. Although learners who saw the face reported having a better lecture experience than those who chose not to see the face, 35% watched videos without the face for self-reported reasons including avoiding distraction. Building on these insights, the authors developed a video presentation style that strategically shows the face to reduce distraction while preserving occasional social cues. A 10-week field experiment (N = 12,468) compared the constant with the strategic presentation of the face and provided evidence consistent with the image principle. Cognitive load and perceived social presence were higher in the strategic than in the constant condition, but learning outcomes and attrition did not differ. Learners who expressed a verbal learning preference experienced substantially lower attrition and cognitive load with the constant than the strategic presentation. The findings highlight the value of social cues for motivation and caution against one-size-fits-all approaches to instructional design that fail to account for individual differences in multimedia instruction.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/edu0000013</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2015-08, Vol.107 (3), p.724-739 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1703935635 |
source | PsycARTICLES; ERIC |
subjects | Adult Learning Audiovisual Instruction Cognition Cognitive Processes Cognitive Style Comparative Analysis Computer Assisted Instruction Cues Difficulty Level Distance Education Educational psychology Electronic Courses Face Perception Female Field Studies Field study Human Human Body Human Channel Capacity Instructional design Instructional Effectiveness Longitudinal Studies Male Massive Open Online Courses Multimedia Multimedia Instruction Observation Online Courses Online instruction Preferences Student Attrition Teaching methods Verbal learning Video Technology |
title | The Instructor's Face in Video Instruction: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Field Studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A00%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Instructor's%20Face%20in%20Video%20Instruction:%20Evidence%20From%20Two%20Large-Scale%20Field%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Kizilcec,%20Ren%C3%A9%20F.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=724-739&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1666305086%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-2de77f25859245ce091def8dccc2c899ce6b4f44adf1d79350f06fe0710ea2ba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1666305086&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1071516&rfr_iscdi=true |