HOW INSTITUTIONS AFFECT GENDER GAPS IN PUBLIC OPINION EXPRESSION

The expression of opinions in ordinary political discussions between citizens is essential to public opinion dynamics such as opinion leadership, false consensus, or pluralistic ignorance. One of the main predictors of expressiveness in citizens' discussions is gender. Although research documen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public opinion quarterly 2015-07, Vol.79 (2), p.544-567
Main Authors: NIR, LILACH, McCLURG, SCOTT D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Gender
Gender equity
Political behavior
Political representation
Public opinion
Social exclusion
Studies
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The expression of opinions in ordinary political discussions between citizens is essential to public opinion dynamics such as opinion leadership, false consensus, or pluralistic ignorance. One of the main predictors of expressiveness in citizens' discussions is gender. Although research documents consistent gaps between men's and women's expressiveness through political discussion, most insights are based on the United States. Absent a comparative perspective, little consideration has been given to major differences across countries in men's and women's access to various institutions, and whether this access correlates with gender gaps in discursive expression. Access affects opportunities of women and men to encounter politically relevant information and connect with potential discussants. The present article tests whether greater egalitarianism in political representation, education, and workforce participation reduces gender gaps in political discussion. Multilevel analyses of the International Social Survey Program data set (approximately N = 36,600; 33 countries) show that several country-level features affect the contribution of gender to political discussion, but in ways that suggest a trade-off between gender equality and opinion expressiveness.
ISSN:0033-362X
1537-5331
DOI:10.1093/poq/nfv016