The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid

States from the Global South, led by China, Venezuela, and Brazil, have become considerably more active in the foreign aid donor community in the past few years. This paper examines the strategic impact of the emerging foreign aid donors. The breadth and depth of the financial support provided by th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New England journal of political science 2015-04, Vol.8 (1), p.86
Main Author: Collins, Stephen D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
American history
Economic development
Foreign aid
Foreign policy
Funding
Grants
International relations
Objectives
Politics
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 86
container_title The New England journal of political science
container_volume 8
creator Collins, Stephen D
description States from the Global South, led by China, Venezuela, and Brazil, have become considerably more active in the foreign aid donor community in the past few years. This paper examines the strategic impact of the emerging foreign aid donors. The breadth and depth of the financial support provided by the South-South aid donors is assessed, and the strategic motivations behind their aid programs are also analyzed. Finally, this work considers whether the growth of South-South aid has significantly diminished the ability of the US to leverage foreign aid to influence policy actions abroad. This study finds that the emerging rival aid programs have weakened the influence effect of US foreign aid. The neutralizing effects of South-South aid, however, are far more limited in comparison to the impact of aid competition during the bipolar era, as actual aid disbursements by the rising aid rivals are smaller than reported, counterbalancing actions tend to be more selective, and the long-term viability of some emerging aid programs remains uncertain.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1712273260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3806558671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_17122732603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWD93eOA68JLaZC3S6r7dl1iTNiU0ms_9FfEAbmYWMytSsKpCygSeNmQb44zIJQpeENlNGq7O35WDNgWV9GgHqI3RQ4rgDbQ-p4l-CY0P2o4LnO1jT9ZGuagPP-_Isam7y40-g39lHVM_-xyWT-qZZJzLkgss_7veKV40Dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712273260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Collins, Stephen D</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><description>States from the Global South, led by China, Venezuela, and Brazil, have become considerably more active in the foreign aid donor community in the past few years. This paper examines the strategic impact of the emerging foreign aid donors. The breadth and depth of the financial support provided by the South-South aid donors is assessed, and the strategic motivations behind their aid programs are also analyzed. Finally, this work considers whether the growth of South-South aid has significantly diminished the ability of the US to leverage foreign aid to influence policy actions abroad. This study finds that the emerging rival aid programs have weakened the influence effect of US foreign aid. The neutralizing effects of South-South aid, however, are far more limited in comparison to the impact of aid competition during the bipolar era, as actual aid disbursements by the rising aid rivals are smaller than reported, counterbalancing actions tend to be more selective, and the long-term viability of some emerging aid programs remains uncertain.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1550-1604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: New England Journal of Political Science</publisher><subject>American history ; Economic development ; Foreign aid ; Foreign policy ; Funding ; Grants ; International relations ; Objectives ; Politics</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of political science, 2015-04, Vol.8 (1), p.86</ispartof><rights>Copyright New England Journal of Political Science Spring 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1712273260/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1712273260?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,21386,21393,33610,33984,43732,43947,74092,74339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><title>The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid</title><title>The New England journal of political science</title><description>States from the Global South, led by China, Venezuela, and Brazil, have become considerably more active in the foreign aid donor community in the past few years. This paper examines the strategic impact of the emerging foreign aid donors. The breadth and depth of the financial support provided by the South-South aid donors is assessed, and the strategic motivations behind their aid programs are also analyzed. Finally, this work considers whether the growth of South-South aid has significantly diminished the ability of the US to leverage foreign aid to influence policy actions abroad. This study finds that the emerging rival aid programs have weakened the influence effect of US foreign aid. The neutralizing effects of South-South aid, however, are far more limited in comparison to the impact of aid competition during the bipolar era, as actual aid disbursements by the rising aid rivals are smaller than reported, counterbalancing actions tend to be more selective, and the long-term viability of some emerging aid programs remains uncertain.</description><subject>American history</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Foreign aid</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>1550-1604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWD93eOA68JLaZC3S6r7dl1iTNiU0ms_9FfEAbmYWMytSsKpCygSeNmQb44zIJQpeENlNGq7O35WDNgWV9GgHqI3RQ4rgDbQ-p4l-CY0P2o4LnO1jT9ZGuagPP-_Isam7y40-g39lHVM_-xyWT-qZZJzLkgss_7veKV40Dw</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Collins, Stephen D</creator><general>New England Journal of Political Science</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid</title><author>Collins, Stephen D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_17122732603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>American history</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Foreign aid</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Stephen D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of political science</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><pages>86-</pages><eissn>1550-1604</eissn><abstract>States from the Global South, led by China, Venezuela, and Brazil, have become considerably more active in the foreign aid donor community in the past few years. This paper examines the strategic impact of the emerging foreign aid donors. The breadth and depth of the financial support provided by the South-South aid donors is assessed, and the strategic motivations behind their aid programs are also analyzed. Finally, this work considers whether the growth of South-South aid has significantly diminished the ability of the US to leverage foreign aid to influence policy actions abroad. This study finds that the emerging rival aid programs have weakened the influence effect of US foreign aid. The neutralizing effects of South-South aid, however, are far more limited in comparison to the impact of aid competition during the bipolar era, as actual aid disbursements by the rising aid rivals are smaller than reported, counterbalancing actions tend to be more selective, and the long-term viability of some emerging aid programs remains uncertain.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>New England Journal of Political Science</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1550-1604
ispartof The New England journal of political science, 2015-04, Vol.8 (1), p.86
issn 1550-1604
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1712273260
source Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects American history
Economic development
Foreign aid
Foreign policy
Funding
Grants
International relations
Objectives
Politics
title The Global Strategic Effects of South-South Foreign Aid
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Global%20Strategic%20Effects%20of%20South-South%20Foreign%20Aid&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Collins,%20Stephen%20D&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.pages=86-&rft.eissn=1550-1604&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3806558671%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_17122732603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712273260&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true