Loading…

Assessments: an open and closed case

Open book assessment is not a new idea, but it does not seem to have gained ground in higher education. In particular, not much literature is available on open book examinations in mathematics and statistics in higher education. The objective of this paper is to investigate the appropriateness of op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of mathematical education in science and technology 2015-10, Vol.46 (7), p.1061-1074
Main Author: Khan, R. Nazim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3
container_end_page 1074
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1061
container_title International journal of mathematical education in science and technology
container_volume 46
creator Khan, R. Nazim
description Open book assessment is not a new idea, but it does not seem to have gained ground in higher education. In particular, not much literature is available on open book examinations in mathematics and statistics in higher education. The objective of this paper is to investigate the appropriateness of open book assessments in a first-year business statistics course. Data over two semesters of open book assessments provided some interesting results when compared with the closed book assessment regime in the following semester. The relevance of the results is discussed and compared with findings from the literature. The implications of insights gained for further practice in the assessment of mathematics and statistics is also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1076534
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1719266648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1076875</ericid><sourcerecordid>3827953491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfYTDQ186bNGkSnxxj_mPgi4JvIW0T6Oiamdsh-_amVH306VxyficHDiEzCgsKCm4BGMhcfywYUJGeZCFyfkImlBc8E4zSUzIZmGyAzskF4hYAKOd6Qm6WiA5x57oe7-a2m4e965LW86oN6JJYdJfkzNsW3dWPTsn7w_pt9ZRtXh-fV8tNVvEc-qxWnLFU761mORNeWqlLUWmrOUsnaAGqVLSUdYKY9FL7nCmloaxlXXiXT8n1-O8-hs-Dw95swyF2qdJQSTUrioKrRImRqmJAjM6bfWx2Nh4NBTMMYn4HMcMg5meQlJuNOReb6i-zfhl8JUXy70e_6XyIO_sVYlub3h7bEH20XdWgyf-v-AYm023J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719266648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessments: an open and closed case</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Khan, R. Nazim</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, R. Nazim</creatorcontrib><description>Open book assessment is not a new idea, but it does not seem to have gained ground in higher education. In particular, not much literature is available on open book examinations in mathematics and statistics in higher education. The objective of this paper is to investigate the appropriateness of open book assessments in a first-year business statistics course. Data over two semesters of open book assessments provided some interesting results when compared with the closed book assessment regime in the following semester. The relevance of the results is discussed and compared with findings from the literature. The implications of insights gained for further practice in the assessment of mathematics and statistics is also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-739X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1076534</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJMEBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Australia ; Business Administration Education ; College Freshmen ; Data Analysis ; Evaluation Methods ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Investigations ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Tests ; open book assessments ; Predictor Variables ; Scores ; Statistical Data ; Statistics ; Student Evaluation ; Student Records ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2015-10, Vol.46 (7), p.1061-1074</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis 2015</rights><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1076875$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, R. Nazim</creatorcontrib><title>Assessments: an open and closed case</title><title>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</title><description>Open book assessment is not a new idea, but it does not seem to have gained ground in higher education. In particular, not much literature is available on open book examinations in mathematics and statistics in higher education. The objective of this paper is to investigate the appropriateness of open book assessments in a first-year business statistics course. Data over two semesters of open book assessments provided some interesting results when compared with the closed book assessment regime in the following semester. The relevance of the results is discussed and compared with findings from the literature. The implications of insights gained for further practice in the assessment of mathematics and statistics is also discussed.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>College Freshmen</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Tests</subject><subject>open book assessments</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Records</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>0020-739X</issn><issn>1464-5211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfYTDQ186bNGkSnxxj_mPgi4JvIW0T6Oiamdsh-_amVH306VxyficHDiEzCgsKCm4BGMhcfywYUJGeZCFyfkImlBc8E4zSUzIZmGyAzskF4hYAKOd6Qm6WiA5x57oe7-a2m4e965LW86oN6JJYdJfkzNsW3dWPTsn7w_pt9ZRtXh-fV8tNVvEc-qxWnLFU761mORNeWqlLUWmrOUsnaAGqVLSUdYKY9FL7nCmloaxlXXiXT8n1-O8-hs-Dw95swyF2qdJQSTUrioKrRImRqmJAjM6bfWx2Nh4NBTMMYn4HMcMg5meQlJuNOReb6i-zfhl8JUXy70e_6XyIO_sVYlub3h7bEH20XdWgyf-v-AYm023J</recordid><startdate>20151003</startdate><enddate>20151003</enddate><creator>Khan, R. Nazim</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151003</creationdate><title>Assessments: an open and closed case</title><author>Khan, R. Nazim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>College Freshmen</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Tests</topic><topic>open book assessments</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Records</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, R. Nazim</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, R. Nazim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1076875</ericid><atitle>Assessments: an open and closed case</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mathematical education in science and technology</jtitle><date>2015-10-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1074</epage><pages>1061-1074</pages><issn>0020-739X</issn><eissn>1464-5211</eissn><coden>IJMEBM</coden><abstract>Open book assessment is not a new idea, but it does not seem to have gained ground in higher education. In particular, not much literature is available on open book examinations in mathematics and statistics in higher education. The objective of this paper is to investigate the appropriateness of open book assessments in a first-year business statistics course. Data over two semesters of open book assessments provided some interesting results when compared with the closed book assessment regime in the following semester. The relevance of the results is discussed and compared with findings from the literature. The implications of insights gained for further practice in the assessment of mathematics and statistics is also discussed.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/0020739X.2015.1076534</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-739X
ispartof International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 2015-10, Vol.46 (7), p.1061-1074
issn 0020-739X
1464-5211
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1719266648
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list); ERIC
subjects Australia
Business Administration Education
College Freshmen
Data Analysis
Evaluation Methods
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Investigations
Mathematics
Mathematics Tests
open book assessments
Predictor Variables
Scores
Statistical Data
Statistics
Student Evaluation
Student Records
Test Reliability
Test Validity
title Assessments: an open and closed case
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessments:%20an%20open%20and%20closed%20case&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mathematical%20education%20in%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Khan,%20R.%20Nazim&rft.date=2015-10-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1074&rft.pages=1061-1074&rft.issn=0020-739X&rft.eissn=1464-5211&rft.coden=IJMEBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1076534&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3827953491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d8422107fa92325f7a79b5c9a942a7909508b81b7d10727f79f328890bd7d6fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719266648&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1076875&rfr_iscdi=true