TCT-353 Variability in Quantitative Precision of Intravascular Imaging Modalities: Head-to-Head Comparison of Currently Available Coronary Imaging Systems

Methods Five coronary models with known lumen diameters (1.51-5.04 mm) were imaged using 2 OCT and 4 IVUS systems: 1) optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI, FastView, Terumo), 2) Fourier-domain OCT (FD-OCT, Dragonfly JP, St. Jude Medical), 3) 40-MHz mechanical IVUS (ViewIT, Terumo), 4) 40-MHz mecha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015-10, Vol.66 (15), p.B142-B142
Main Authors: Kobayashi, Yuhei, Kitahara, Hideki, Tanaka, Shigemitsu, Okada, Kozo, Kimura, Takumi, Ikeno, Fumiaki, Yock, Paul, Fitzgerald, Peter J, Honda, Yasuhiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Internal Medicine
Medical imaging
Validation studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Methods Five coronary models with known lumen diameters (1.51-5.04 mm) were imaged using 2 OCT and 4 IVUS systems: 1) optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI, FastView, Terumo), 2) Fourier-domain OCT (FD-OCT, Dragonfly JP, St. Jude Medical), 3) 40-MHz mechanical IVUS (ViewIT, Terumo), 4) 40-MHz mechanical IVUS (OptiCross, Boston Scientific), 5) 45-MHz mechanical IVUS (Revolution, Volcano), and 6) 20-MHz solid-state IVUS (Eagle Eye Platinum, Volcano).
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.971