Loading…

Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights

The authors conduct a meta-analysis to examine dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships. Analyses reveal that dependence affects performance primarily through relationship quality and cooperation, while interdependence has substantial direct effects as well as effects mediated throu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2015-11, Vol.43 (6), p.694-712
Main Authors: Scheer, Lisa K., Miao, C. Fred, Palmatier, Robert W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3
container_end_page 712
container_issue 6
container_start_page 694
container_title Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
container_volume 43
creator Scheer, Lisa K.
Miao, C. Fred
Palmatier, Robert W.
description The authors conduct a meta-analysis to examine dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships. Analyses reveal that dependence affects performance primarily through relationship quality and cooperation, while interdependence has substantial direct effects as well as effects mediated through relationship-specific investments and cooperation. Regarding relationship context, effects of dependence are stronger in channel relationships than end-user relationships and for services than goods; interdependence does not display the same pattern. Regarding methodological context, dependence measures that emphasize relationship value versus switching costs have different moderating effects; greater general dependence content is associated with weaker effect sizes for dependence but conversely greater effect sizes for interdependence. These results suggest that new insights can be gained by distinguishing relationship value and switching cost components of dependence and by investigating the possibility that the conceptual domain of interdependence differs from that of dependence. Future research that strives for greater precision in the measurement of dependence and interdependence constructs and that simultaneously examines dependence and interdependence is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11747-014-0418-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1728359175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3852279181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC5-hMNtk03qR-QkEEPYfsbrZNbbNrkh76701ZQS-eBobnfZl5CLlEuEYAeRMRJZcUkFPgOKN4RCYoBKNyxvgxmQAoRkFCeUrOYlwDAC8rPiFv93awvrW-sYXxbeF8sqH93TlfbE34tMn5ZRHsxiTX-7hyQ7wttjYZarzZ7JNrMhndcpXiOTnpzCbai585JR-PD-_zZ7p4fXqZ3y1ow1EmysBIUAoNcsZYLQU3Xd1UNdjSSFWJfGDdoERWKmxV28muVnVdyU5xJaqyLafkauwdQv-1szHpdb8L-ZqoUbJZKRRKkSkcqSb0MQbb6SG4_NFeI-iDOT2a09mcPpjTmDNszMTM-qUNf5r_DX0DrWZwyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728359175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Scheer, Lisa K. ; Miao, C. Fred ; Palmatier, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Lisa K. ; Miao, C. Fred ; Palmatier, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors conduct a meta-analysis to examine dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships. Analyses reveal that dependence affects performance primarily through relationship quality and cooperation, while interdependence has substantial direct effects as well as effects mediated through relationship-specific investments and cooperation. Regarding relationship context, effects of dependence are stronger in channel relationships than end-user relationships and for services than goods; interdependence does not display the same pattern. Regarding methodological context, dependence measures that emphasize relationship value versus switching costs have different moderating effects; greater general dependence content is associated with weaker effect sizes for dependence but conversely greater effect sizes for interdependence. These results suggest that new insights can be gained by distinguishing relationship value and switching cost components of dependence and by investigating the possibility that the conceptual domain of interdependence differs from that of dependence. Future research that strives for greater precision in the measurement of dependence and interdependence constructs and that simultaneously examines dependence and interdependence is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0418-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMSDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Business and Management ; Cooperation ; Dependence ; Distribution channels ; Interdependence ; Marketing ; Meta-analysis ; Original Empirical Research ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-11, Vol.43 (6), p.694-712</ispartof><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2014</rights><rights>Academy of Marketing Science 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1728359175/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1728359175?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,27924,27925,36050,36060,44361,44363,74893,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Lisa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, C. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmatier, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</title><addtitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</addtitle><description>The authors conduct a meta-analysis to examine dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships. Analyses reveal that dependence affects performance primarily through relationship quality and cooperation, while interdependence has substantial direct effects as well as effects mediated through relationship-specific investments and cooperation. Regarding relationship context, effects of dependence are stronger in channel relationships than end-user relationships and for services than goods; interdependence does not display the same pattern. Regarding methodological context, dependence measures that emphasize relationship value versus switching costs have different moderating effects; greater general dependence content is associated with weaker effect sizes for dependence but conversely greater effect sizes for interdependence. These results suggest that new insights can be gained by distinguishing relationship value and switching cost components of dependence and by investigating the possibility that the conceptual domain of interdependence differs from that of dependence. Future research that strives for greater precision in the measurement of dependence and interdependence constructs and that simultaneously examines dependence and interdependence is recommended.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Distribution channels</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original Empirical Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0092-0703</issn><issn>1552-7824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC5-hMNtk03qR-QkEEPYfsbrZNbbNrkh76701ZQS-eBobnfZl5CLlEuEYAeRMRJZcUkFPgOKN4RCYoBKNyxvgxmQAoRkFCeUrOYlwDAC8rPiFv93awvrW-sYXxbeF8sqH93TlfbE34tMn5ZRHsxiTX-7hyQ7wttjYZarzZ7JNrMhndcpXiOTnpzCbai585JR-PD-_zZ7p4fXqZ3y1ow1EmysBIUAoNcsZYLQU3Xd1UNdjSSFWJfGDdoERWKmxV28muVnVdyU5xJaqyLafkauwdQv-1szHpdb8L-ZqoUbJZKRRKkSkcqSb0MQbb6SG4_NFeI-iDOT2a09mcPpjTmDNszMTM-qUNf5r_DX0DrWZwyA</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Scheer, Lisa K.</creator><creator>Miao, C. Fred</creator><creator>Palmatier, Robert W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights</title><author>Scheer, Lisa K. ; Miao, C. Fred ; Palmatier, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Distribution channels</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original Empirical Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Lisa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, C. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmatier, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheer, Lisa K.</au><au>Miao, C. Fred</au><au>Palmatier, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle><stitle>J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci</stitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>694-712</pages><issn>0092-0703</issn><eissn>1552-7824</eissn><coden>JAMSDE</coden><abstract>The authors conduct a meta-analysis to examine dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships. Analyses reveal that dependence affects performance primarily through relationship quality and cooperation, while interdependence has substantial direct effects as well as effects mediated through relationship-specific investments and cooperation. Regarding relationship context, effects of dependence are stronger in channel relationships than end-user relationships and for services than goods; interdependence does not display the same pattern. Regarding methodological context, dependence measures that emphasize relationship value versus switching costs have different moderating effects; greater general dependence content is associated with weaker effect sizes for dependence but conversely greater effect sizes for interdependence. These results suggest that new insights can be gained by distinguishing relationship value and switching cost components of dependence and by investigating the possibility that the conceptual domain of interdependence differs from that of dependence. Future research that strives for greater precision in the measurement of dependence and interdependence constructs and that simultaneously examines dependence and interdependence is recommended.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11747-014-0418-1</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-0703
ispartof Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015-11, Vol.43 (6), p.694-712
issn 0092-0703
1552-7824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1728359175
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Archive; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Asymmetry
Business and Management
Cooperation
Dependence
Distribution channels
Interdependence
Marketing
Meta-analysis
Original Empirical Research
Social Sciences
Studies
Systematic review
Variables
title Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: meta-analytic insights
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A23%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dependence%20and%20interdependence%20in%20marketing%20relationships:%20meta-analytic%20insights&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Marketing%20Science&rft.au=Scheer,%20Lisa%20K.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=694-712&rft.issn=0092-0703&rft.eissn=1552-7824&rft.coden=JAMSDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11747-014-0418-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3852279181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-20a70991a14222b754afbc6b0e3a7965004bc1712391d9df7fb9bb67f949563d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728359175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true