With Their Permission: Skeptics, Resisters, and Supporters

No major change in thought or action occurs without mistakes, casualties and growth. This article is designed to examine the implementation of integrated curriculum design from a more critical perspective. While the integrated curriculum innovators were confident about the design and their process,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education 2013, Vol.28 (1), p.113-121
Main Authors: Powell, Gwynn M., James, Joy, Johnson, Corey W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
College Faculty
Curriculum Design
Curriculum development
Degree Requirements
Department Heads
Educational Innovation
Evaluation Methods
Georgia
Higher Education
Integrated Curriculum
Interdisciplinary Approach
Program Development
Program Implementation
South Carolina
Standardized Tests
Student Development
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Role
Utah
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 121
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education
container_volume 28
creator Powell, Gwynn M.
James, Joy
Johnson, Corey W.
description No major change in thought or action occurs without mistakes, casualties and growth. This article is designed to examine the implementation of integrated curriculum design from a more critical perspective. While the integrated curriculum innovators were confident about the design and their process, not all of their colleagues were interested in the change or agreed it was effective. Thus, the goal of this article is to give voice to the concerns of those who are not directly engaged in the implementation, in an effort to reveal some of the more personal ramifications of the process, highlight the evolution of thinking as the process matured and to offer advice
doi_str_mv 10.1080/1937156X.2013.11949701
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1730037915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A436697312</galeid><ericid>EJ1024317</ericid><sourcerecordid>A436697312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-6b7eb5168ea2b56b6e176859e2aa2bb704656d4c1edd505864ab733274de36883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFaPHpWC58Sd_UyOpdQvBD1U9LZsko3dkmTrbor0v3dDrFeZw8DM-808HkLXgFPAGb6FnErg4iMlGGgKkLNcYjhCEwKCJAzn8hhNBlEyqE7RWQgbjClgRifo8t3269lqbayfvRrf2hCs687RSa2bYC5--xS93S1Xi4fk-eX-cTF_TkoiWJ-IQpqCg8iMJgUXhTAgRcZzQ3QcFBIzwUXFSjBVxTHPBNOFpJRIVhkqsoxO0c14d-vd186EXm3cznfxpQJJo0mZA4-qdFR96sYo29Wu97qMVZnWlq4ztY3zOaNC5JICiYAYgdK7ELyp1dbbVvu9AqyGzNQhMzVkpg6ZRfBqBI235R-0fAJMGI2Opmg-7gcTvtXfzjeV6vW-cb72uittUPSfHz8YvHl9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730037915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>With Their Permission: Skeptics, Resisters, and Supporters</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Powell, Gwynn M. ; James, Joy ; Johnson, Corey W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Powell, Gwynn M. ; James, Joy ; Johnson, Corey W.</creatorcontrib><description>No major change in thought or action occurs without mistakes, casualties and growth. This article is designed to examine the implementation of integrated curriculum design from a more critical perspective. While the integrated curriculum innovators were confident about the design and their process, not all of their colleagues were interested in the change or agreed it was effective. Thus, the goal of this article is to give voice to the concerns of those who are not directly engaged in the implementation, in an effort to reveal some of the more personal ramifications of the process, highlight the evolution of thinking as the process matured and to offer advice</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-156X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-4097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1041-7052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1937156X.2013.11949701</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ashburn: Routledge</publisher><subject>College Faculty ; Curriculum Design ; Curriculum development ; Degree Requirements ; Department Heads ; Educational Innovation ; Evaluation Methods ; Georgia ; Higher Education ; Integrated Curriculum ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Program Development ; Program Implementation ; South Carolina ; Standardized Tests ; Student Development ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Role ; Utah</subject><ispartof>Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education, 2013, Vol.28 (1), p.113-121</ispartof><rights>2013 Taylor &amp; Francis 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Sagamore Publishing LLC 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1730037915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21357,21373,27900,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1024317$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Powell, Gwynn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Corey W.</creatorcontrib><title>With Their Permission: Skeptics, Resisters, and Supporters</title><title>Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education</title><description>No major change in thought or action occurs without mistakes, casualties and growth. This article is designed to examine the implementation of integrated curriculum design from a more critical perspective. While the integrated curriculum innovators were confident about the design and their process, not all of their colleagues were interested in the change or agreed it was effective. Thus, the goal of this article is to give voice to the concerns of those who are not directly engaged in the implementation, in an effort to reveal some of the more personal ramifications of the process, highlight the evolution of thinking as the process matured and to offer advice</description><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Degree Requirements</subject><subject>Department Heads</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Georgia</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Integrated Curriculum</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Student Development</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Role</subject><subject>Utah</subject><issn>1937-156X</issn><issn>2162-4097</issn><issn>1041-7052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFaPHpWC58Sd_UyOpdQvBD1U9LZsko3dkmTrbor0v3dDrFeZw8DM-808HkLXgFPAGb6FnErg4iMlGGgKkLNcYjhCEwKCJAzn8hhNBlEyqE7RWQgbjClgRifo8t3269lqbayfvRrf2hCs687RSa2bYC5--xS93S1Xi4fk-eX-cTF_TkoiWJ-IQpqCg8iMJgUXhTAgRcZzQ3QcFBIzwUXFSjBVxTHPBNOFpJRIVhkqsoxO0c14d-vd186EXm3cznfxpQJJo0mZA4-qdFR96sYo29Wu97qMVZnWlq4ztY3zOaNC5JICiYAYgdK7ELyp1dbbVvu9AqyGzNQhMzVkpg6ZRfBqBI235R-0fAJMGI2Opmg-7gcTvtXfzjeV6vW-cb72uittUPSfHz8YvHl9</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Powell, Gwynn M.</creator><creator>James, Joy</creator><creator>Johnson, Corey W.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Sagamore Publishing LLC</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>With Their Permission</title><author>Powell, Gwynn M. ; James, Joy ; Johnson, Corey W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-6b7eb5168ea2b56b6e176859e2aa2bb704656d4c1edd505864ab733274de36883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Degree Requirements</topic><topic>Department Heads</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Georgia</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Integrated Curriculum</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Student Development</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Role</topic><topic>Utah</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Powell, Gwynn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Corey W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Powell, Gwynn M.</au><au>James, Joy</au><au>Johnson, Corey W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1024317</ericid><atitle>With Their Permission: Skeptics, Resisters, and Supporters</atitle><jtitle>Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>113-121</pages><issn>1937-156X</issn><eissn>2162-4097</eissn><eissn>1041-7052</eissn><abstract>No major change in thought or action occurs without mistakes, casualties and growth. This article is designed to examine the implementation of integrated curriculum design from a more critical perspective. While the integrated curriculum innovators were confident about the design and their process, not all of their colleagues were interested in the change or agreed it was effective. Thus, the goal of this article is to give voice to the concerns of those who are not directly engaged in the implementation, in an effort to reveal some of the more personal ramifications of the process, highlight the evolution of thinking as the process matured and to offer advice</abstract><cop>Ashburn</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/1937156X.2013.11949701</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1937-156X
ispartof Schole : a journal of leisure studies and recreation education, 2013, Vol.28 (1), p.113-121
issn 1937-156X
2162-4097
1041-7052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1730037915
source Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ERIC; Education Collection; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects College Faculty
Curriculum Design
Curriculum development
Degree Requirements
Department Heads
Educational Innovation
Evaluation Methods
Georgia
Higher Education
Integrated Curriculum
Interdisciplinary Approach
Program Development
Program Implementation
South Carolina
Standardized Tests
Student Development
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Role
Utah
title With Their Permission: Skeptics, Resisters, and Supporters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=With%20Their%20Permission:%20Skeptics,%20Resisters,%20and%20Supporters&rft.jtitle=Schole%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20leisure%20studies%20and%20recreation%20education&rft.au=Powell,%20Gwynn%20M.&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=113-121&rft.issn=1937-156X&rft.eissn=2162-4097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1937156X.2013.11949701&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA436697312%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-6b7eb5168ea2b56b6e176859e2aa2bb704656d4c1edd505864ab733274de36883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730037915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A436697312&rft_ericid=EJ1024317&rfr_iscdi=true