Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Sulfuric Acid and Sodium Sulfate Blend, Peroxyacetic Acid, and Cetylpyridinium Chloride against Salmonella on Inoculated Chicken Wings

• Published in: Journal of food protection 2015-11, Vol.78 (11), p.1967-1972
• Main Authors: Scott, Brittney R, Yang, Xiang, Geornaras, Ifigenia, Delmore, Robert J, Woerner, Dale R, Reagan, James O, Morgan, J Brad, Belk, Keith E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antimicrobial agents; Cetylpyridinium - pharmacology; Chickens; Food Additives - pharmacology; Food Contamination - prevention & control; Food Preservation - methods; Food safety; Intervention; Pathogens; Peptones; Peracetic Acid - pharmacology; Poultry; Salmonella; Salmonella - drug effects; Salmonella - growth & development; Sodium sulfate; Studies; Sulfates; Sulfates - pharmacology; Sulfuric acid; Sulfuric Acids - pharmacology; Wings, Animal - microbiology
• ISSN: 0362-028X; 1944-9097
• DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-170

Studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a commercial blend of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate (SSS) in reducing Salmonella on inoculated whole chilled chicken wings and to compare its efficacy to peroxyacetic acid (PAA) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). Wings were spot inoculated (5 to 6 log CFU/ml of sample rinsate) with a five-strain mixture of novobiocin- and nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella and then left untreated (control) or treated by immersing individual wings in 350 ml of antimicrobial solution. An initial study evaluated two treatment immersion times, 10 and 20 s, of SSS (pH 1.1) and compared cell recoveries following rinsing of treated samples with buffered peptone water or Dey/Engley neutralizing broth. In a second study, inoculated wings were treated with SSS (pH 1.1; 20 s), PAA (700 ppm, 20 s), or CPC (4,000 ppm, 10 s) and analyzed for survivors immediately after treatment (0 h) and after 24 h of aerobic storage at 4°C. Color and pH analyses were also conducted in the latter study. Recovery of Salmonella survivors following treatment with SSS (10 or 20 s) was not (P ≥ 0.05) affected by the type of cell recovery rinse solution (buffered peptone water or Dey/Engley neutralizing broth), but there was an effect (P < 0.05) of SSS treatment time. Immersion of samples for 10 or 20 s in SSS resulted in pathogen reductions of 0.8 to 0.9 and 1.1 to 1.2 log CFU/ml, respectively. Results of the second study showed that there was an interaction (P < 0.05) between antimicrobial type and storage time. Efficacy against Salmonella at 0 h increased in the order CPC , SSS , PAA; however, after 24 h of aerobic storage, pathogen counts of SSS- and PAA-treated wings did not differ (P ≥ 0.05). Overall, the results indicated that SSS applied at pH 1.1 for 20 s was an effective antimicrobial intervention to reduce Salmonella contamination on chicken wings.