Ohio v. Darius Clark: A Real-Life Whodunit

This commentary describes the rule against hearsay evidence, exceptions to the rule against hearsay, and the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution, all in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court's, 2015 decision in Ohio v. Darius Clark. The commentary discusses the Supreme Court's de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 2015-11, Vol.21 (4), p.383-388
Main Author: Myers, John E. B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjudication
Child Abuse
Human
Legal Testimony
Witnesses
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This commentary describes the rule against hearsay evidence, exceptions to the rule against hearsay, and the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution, all in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court's, 2015 decision in Ohio v. Darius Clark. The commentary discusses the Supreme Court's decision and three legal briefs published in this issue.
ISSN:1076-8971
1939-1528
DOI:10.1037/law0000070