Advances in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Critical Consciousness

This article reviews three emergent measures of critical consciousness (CC), which refers to marginalized or oppressed people’s critical reflection on oppressive social, economic, or political conditions, the motivation to address perceived injustice, and action taken to counter such injustice in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Urban review 2015-12, Vol.47 (5), p.809-823
Main Authors: Diemer, Matthew A., McWhirter, Ellen Hawley, Ozer, Emily J., Rapa, Luke J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Achievement
Adolescents
Career Development
Community and Environmental Psychology
Consciousness Raising
Critical Thinking
Disadvantaged
Discipline Policy
Education
Ethnic Groups
Justice
Measurement Techniques
Measures (Individuals)
Mixed Methods Research
Politics
Quantitative analysis
Recognition (Achievement)
Reflection
Semantics
Social Development
Social Justice
Sociology
Student Diversity
Student Motivation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article reviews three emergent measures of critical consciousness (CC), which refers to marginalized or oppressed people’s critical reflection on oppressive social, economic, or political conditions, the motivation to address perceived injustice, and action taken to counter such injustice in a liberatory manner (Freire in Education for critical consciousness. Continuum, New York, 1973 ; Watts et al. in New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 134:43–57, 2011 ). Until recently, no instruments were explicitly designed to measure CC, resulting in fragmented approaches to its conceptualization and measurement. The concurrent development and validation of three measures—the Measure of Adolescent Critical Consciousness (McWhirter and McWhirter 2016 ), the Critical Consciousness Inventory (Thomas et al. in J Res Adolesc 24(3):485–496, 2014 ), and the Critical Consciousness Scale (Diemer et al. in press)—represents a significant scholarly advance. We argue that these new measures provide a ‘conceptual anchor’ for subsequent CC inquiry, useful for both quantitative and qualitative studies. We also recommend mixed-methods approaches to research aimed at understanding how CC develops and operates. We conclude by raising a number of questions to guide future research, the answers to which will further refine scholars’ conceptualization and measurement of CC.
ISSN:0042-0972
1573-1960
DOI:10.1007/s11256-015-0336-7