Loading…
PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE
In an article in the first volume of Harris' Studies in Neoplatonism, Patrick Atherton described what he saw as radical difference between the Trinitarian and the Neoplatonic first principles.
Saved in:
Published in: | Heythrop journal 2016-01, Vol.57 (1), p.74-83 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 83 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Heythrop journal |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | O'NEILL, SEAMUS |
description | In an article in the first volume of Harris' Studies in Neoplatonism, Patrick Atherton described what he saw as radical difference between the Trinitarian and the Neoplatonic first principles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00686.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1748645108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3894325211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-707022261ee8d4036e625f71595be2a46ce53b7829170a1d5df16bd8035740533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwkAQhjdGExH9D5t48NQ60-4XJh6aWqCGdBtaUE6bAksCfoCtRvj3LqKe3ctuZt9nZvIQQhF8dOd65SMTygsCwf0AEH0AoYS_PSKtv49j0gJA5SF2xCk5a5oVuBSITouMcz3M-5PhhJb9hEa5LsqoTG5oVBRJUaRZj_4Grgo6TKK4THVGS03zgS7TbFS48p2Oy2GaJVR3v7voLDknJ4vqubEXP3ebjLpJGfe9ge6lcTTwZgyk8CRICNyGaK2aMwiFFQFfSOQdPrVBxcTM8nAqVdBBCRXO-XyBYjpXEHLJgIdhm1we-m7q9duHbd7Nav1Rv7qRBiVTgnEE5VLqkJrV66ap7cJs6uVLVe8MgtlbNCuzl2X2sszeovm2aLYOvT2gn8tnu_s3Z_rJ5N69HO8d-GXzbrd_fFU_GSFDyc1D1jM5BmMWskcTh1-0uH2S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1748645108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</creator><creatorcontrib>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</creatorcontrib><description>In an article in the first volume of Harris' Studies in Neoplatonism, Patrick Atherton described what he saw as radical difference between the Trinitarian and the Neoplatonic first principles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00686.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Theology</subject><ispartof>Heythrop journal, 2016-01, Vol.57 (1), p.74-83</ispartof><rights>2011 The Author. The Heythrop Journal © 2011 Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered</rights><rights>2016 Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</creatorcontrib><title>PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE</title><title>Heythrop journal</title><description>In an article in the first volume of Harris' Studies in Neoplatonism, Patrick Atherton described what he saw as radical difference between the Trinitarian and the Neoplatonic first principles.</description><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0018-1196</issn><issn>1468-2265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwkAQhjdGExH9D5t48NQ60-4XJh6aWqCGdBtaUE6bAksCfoCtRvj3LqKe3ctuZt9nZvIQQhF8dOd65SMTygsCwf0AEH0AoYS_PSKtv49j0gJA5SF2xCk5a5oVuBSITouMcz3M-5PhhJb9hEa5LsqoTG5oVBRJUaRZj_4Grgo6TKK4THVGS03zgS7TbFS48p2Oy2GaJVR3v7voLDknJ4vqubEXP3ebjLpJGfe9ge6lcTTwZgyk8CRICNyGaK2aMwiFFQFfSOQdPrVBxcTM8nAqVdBBCRXO-XyBYjpXEHLJgIdhm1we-m7q9duHbd7Nav1Rv7qRBiVTgnEE5VLqkJrV66ap7cJs6uVLVe8MgtlbNCuzl2X2sszeovm2aLYOvT2gn8tnu_s3Z_rJ5N69HO8d-GXzbrd_fFU_GSFDyc1D1jM5BmMWskcTh1-0uH2S</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE</title><author>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-707022261ee8d4036e625f71595be2a46ce53b7829170a1d5df16bd8035740533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Heythrop journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'NEILL, SEAMUS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE</atitle><jtitle>Heythrop journal</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>74-83</pages><issn>0018-1196</issn><eissn>1468-2265</eissn><abstract>In an article in the first volume of Harris' Studies in Neoplatonism, Patrick Atherton described what he saw as radical difference between the Trinitarian and the Neoplatonic first principles.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00686.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-1196 |
ispartof | Heythrop journal, 2016-01, Vol.57 (1), p.74-83 |
issn | 0018-1196 1468-2265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1748645108 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Theology |
title | PORPHYRY THE APOSTATE: ASSESSING PORPHYRY'S REACTION TO PLOTINUS'S DOCTRINE OF THE ONE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T13%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PORPHYRY%20THE%20APOSTATE:%20ASSESSING%20PORPHYRY'S%20REACTION%20TO%20PLOTINUS'S%20DOCTRINE%20OF%20THE%20ONE&rft.jtitle=Heythrop%20journal&rft.au=O'NEILL,%20SEAMUS&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=74-83&rft.issn=0018-1196&rft.eissn=1468-2265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00686.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3894325211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4076-707022261ee8d4036e625f71595be2a46ce53b7829170a1d5df16bd8035740533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1748645108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |