Loading…
Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice
This article argues that the concept of learning outcomes has been defined in Europe so that it can pervade and unify a wide range of policies relating to education and, in particular, to vocational education and training. It seeks to explain why learning outcomes are multi‐dimensional and to clarif...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of education 2015-12, Vol.50 (4), p.404-419 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313 |
container_end_page | 419 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 404 |
container_title | European journal of education |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Stanley, Julian |
description | This article argues that the concept of learning outcomes has been defined in Europe so that it can pervade and unify a wide range of policies relating to education and, in particular, to vocational education and training. It seeks to explain why learning outcomes are multi‐dimensional and to clarify how policy, theoretical and operational dimensions can be distinguished and related to one another. In the light of this, it will propose a theoretical model that helps to clarify what the progressive implementation of an outcomes approach looks like and which one can be used to compare the progress of different countries. Furthermore, the article argues that, when it comes to implementation, there are problems in identifying the use and the impact of learning outcomes. There is a diversity of practice in their design and application as ‘tools’ in the construction of curricula and the influence of these curricula upon teaching and learning is by no means straightforward. There has been remarkable progress in the establishment and referencing of national qualifications frameworks and the use of tools such as level descriptors in Europe, but this cannot be taken as evidence that ‘learning outcomes’ approaches are well established or that they have the intended impact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ejed.12150 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1749528704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26609292</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26609292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PAjEQxRujiYhevJts4s1ksdNuP_ZoEFCzAjEkeGu63WJ2BYrtEuW_d3GVo-8yh_d7M5OH0CXgHjS6tZUtekCA4SPUgYSzmCaUHaMOhgRiSQBO0VkIFW6UMtlBLLPar8v1WzTZ1satbIjiaOjdKpq6ZWl20X0ZjNv6YKPaRVOvTV0ae45OFnoZ7MXv7KLZcDDrP8TZZPTYv8tiQzngmFvQOs_NgstC2kIWQhuRkzxNLTWMpykmhcwJlaApKbhkuU4SQrCRWmAKtIuu27Ub7z62NtSqal5ZNxcViCRlRAqcNNRNSxnvQvB2oTa-XGm_U4DVvhW1b0X9tNLA0MKf5dLu_iHV4Glw_5e5ajNVqJ0_ZAjnOCUpafy49ctQ26-Dr_274oIKpubjkcpe5_3nl7FQkn4Di0t7Wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1749528704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Stanley, Julian</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Julian</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that the concept of learning outcomes has been defined in Europe so that it can pervade and unify a wide range of policies relating to education and, in particular, to vocational education and training. It seeks to explain why learning outcomes are multi‐dimensional and to clarify how policy, theoretical and operational dimensions can be distinguished and related to one another. In the light of this, it will propose a theoretical model that helps to clarify what the progressive implementation of an outcomes approach looks like and which one can be used to compare the progress of different countries. Furthermore, the article argues that, when it comes to implementation, there are problems in identifying the use and the impact of learning outcomes. There is a diversity of practice in their design and application as ‘tools’ in the construction of curricula and the influence of these curricula upon teaching and learning is by no means straightforward. There has been remarkable progress in the establishment and referencing of national qualifications frameworks and the use of tools such as level descriptors in Europe, but this cannot be taken as evidence that ‘learning outcomes’ approaches are well established or that they have the intended impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-8211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12150</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJEDE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Discourse ; Europe ; Learning ; learning outcomes ; national qualifications frameworks ; Part II</subject><ispartof>European journal of education, 2015-12, Vol.50 (4), p.404-419</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26609292$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26609292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Julian</creatorcontrib><title>Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice</title><title>European journal of education</title><addtitle>European Journal of Education</addtitle><description>This article argues that the concept of learning outcomes has been defined in Europe so that it can pervade and unify a wide range of policies relating to education and, in particular, to vocational education and training. It seeks to explain why learning outcomes are multi‐dimensional and to clarify how policy, theoretical and operational dimensions can be distinguished and related to one another. In the light of this, it will propose a theoretical model that helps to clarify what the progressive implementation of an outcomes approach looks like and which one can be used to compare the progress of different countries. Furthermore, the article argues that, when it comes to implementation, there are problems in identifying the use and the impact of learning outcomes. There is a diversity of practice in their design and application as ‘tools’ in the construction of curricula and the influence of these curricula upon teaching and learning is by no means straightforward. There has been remarkable progress in the establishment and referencing of national qualifications frameworks and the use of tools such as level descriptors in Europe, but this cannot be taken as evidence that ‘learning outcomes’ approaches are well established or that they have the intended impact.</description><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>learning outcomes</subject><subject>national qualifications frameworks</subject><subject>Part II</subject><issn>0141-8211</issn><issn>1465-3435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1PAjEQxRujiYhevJts4s1ksdNuP_ZoEFCzAjEkeGu63WJ2BYrtEuW_d3GVo-8yh_d7M5OH0CXgHjS6tZUtekCA4SPUgYSzmCaUHaMOhgRiSQBO0VkIFW6UMtlBLLPar8v1WzTZ1satbIjiaOjdKpq6ZWl20X0ZjNv6YKPaRVOvTV0ae45OFnoZ7MXv7KLZcDDrP8TZZPTYv8tiQzngmFvQOs_NgstC2kIWQhuRkzxNLTWMpykmhcwJlaApKbhkuU4SQrCRWmAKtIuu27Ub7z62NtSqal5ZNxcViCRlRAqcNNRNSxnvQvB2oTa-XGm_U4DVvhW1b0X9tNLA0MKf5dLu_iHV4Glw_5e5ajNVqJ0_ZAjnOCUpafy49ctQ26-Dr_274oIKpubjkcpe5_3nl7FQkn4Di0t7Wg</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Stanley, Julian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice</title><author>Stanley, Julian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>learning outcomes</topic><topic>national qualifications frameworks</topic><topic>Part II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Julian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanley, Julian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice</atitle><jtitle>European journal of education</jtitle><addtitle>European Journal of Education</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>404-419</pages><issn>0141-8211</issn><eissn>1465-3435</eissn><coden>EJEDE6</coden><abstract>This article argues that the concept of learning outcomes has been defined in Europe so that it can pervade and unify a wide range of policies relating to education and, in particular, to vocational education and training. It seeks to explain why learning outcomes are multi‐dimensional and to clarify how policy, theoretical and operational dimensions can be distinguished and related to one another. In the light of this, it will propose a theoretical model that helps to clarify what the progressive implementation of an outcomes approach looks like and which one can be used to compare the progress of different countries. Furthermore, the article argues that, when it comes to implementation, there are problems in identifying the use and the impact of learning outcomes. There is a diversity of practice in their design and application as ‘tools’ in the construction of curricula and the influence of these curricula upon teaching and learning is by no means straightforward. There has been remarkable progress in the establishment and referencing of national qualifications frameworks and the use of tools such as level descriptors in Europe, but this cannot be taken as evidence that ‘learning outcomes’ approaches are well established or that they have the intended impact.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ejed.12150</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-8211 |
ispartof | European journal of education, 2015-12, Vol.50 (4), p.404-419 |
issn | 0141-8211 1465-3435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1749528704 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Discourse Europe Learning learning outcomes national qualifications frameworks Part II |
title | Learning Outcomes - From Policy Discourse to Practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A51%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20Outcomes%20-%20From%20Policy%20Discourse%20to%20Practice&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20education&rft.au=Stanley,%20Julian&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=404-419&rft.issn=0141-8211&rft.eissn=1465-3435&rft.coden=EJEDE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejed.12150&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26609292%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3610-6e1aabbcf68d8ed8d7ac7b2b99e3c569902d8b2381a32d685ba44220c8a70313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1749528704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26609292&rfr_iscdi=true |