Loading…

Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin

This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of adhesion science and technology 2016-03, Vol.30 (6), p.633-641
Main Authors: Sukuroglu, Elcin, Aktas, Guliz, Askın, Kerem, Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti, Özcan, Mutlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3
container_end_page 641
container_issue 6
container_start_page 633
container_title Journal of adhesion science and technology
container_volume 30
creator Sukuroglu, Elcin
Aktas, Guliz
Askın, Kerem
Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti
Özcan, Mutlu
description This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests considering the factors 'core preparation time', 'luting cement', and 'root level' (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01694243.2015.1115616
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1750959988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1786188783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9rFTEQx0NR6LP6JwgBLz24z8xmk5e9VUqrQsGLnkM2P9qUbLImWeVB__hmefXiwdMMzGc-DPNF6D2QPRBBPhHg49APdN8TYHsAYBz4Gdq1Krqtf4V2G9Nt0Dl6U8ojIUA5gR16unHO6oqTw9XPPt5jlzLWKVu8ZLuorKpP8SMOa92G2s42VlyPi8UqGpxTqjjY3zbgFLEyD7Y0fLM5P9mMl1RqwTVhH2tuMuP1GlTGpll8fIteOxWKffdSL9DP25sf11-7u-9fvl1_vuv0AKJ2I-eOUS0GZwYwYiKaWzIx6zQdBsMNhYmYqT-I3gk9wUj7A7BR62liVAlq6AW6PHmXnH6ttlQ5-6JtCCratBYJB8FBiIOgDf3wD_qY1hzbdY1iZGTjKESj2InSOZWSrZNL9rPKRwlEbpnIv5nILRP5kknbuzrt-djePKs_KQcjqzqGlF1WUfsi6f8VzzcalDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750959988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Sukuroglu, Elcin ; Aktas, Guliz ; Askın, Kerem ; Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti ; Özcan, Mutlu</creator><creatorcontrib>Sukuroglu, Elcin ; Aktas, Guliz ; Askın, Kerem ; Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti ; Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests considering the factors 'core preparation time', 'luting cement', and 'root level' (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p &lt; 0.001), time of core preparation (p &lt; 0.001), and root level (p &lt; 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength results. R cement was more significantly affected by core preparation time (Ri: 2.91 ± 1.1; Rd: 4.83 ± 1.68) compared to V cement (Vi: 2.92 ± 1.63; Vd: 2.65 ± 1.6) (p &lt; 0.05). Coronal region demonstrated significantly higher bond strength values than those of middle and apical third in all groups (coronal: 4 ± 1.9; middle: 3.1 ± 1.4; apical: 2.4 ± 1.1) (p &lt; 0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was the most frequent (64%) followed by adhesive failure between cement and post (18%). Delayed core preparation can improve bond strength of FRC posts to intraradicular dentin when cemented with self-adhesive cement compared to conventional dual-polymerized resin cement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-4243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2015.1115616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Utrecht: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Adhesives ; Bond strength ; Bonding strength ; Cement ; Cementing ; Cements ; Dentin ; fiber-reinforced composite posts ; intraradicular root ; Polymers ; post-core ; resin cement ; Resins ; Roots ; Time measurements</subject><ispartof>Journal of adhesion science and technology, 2016-03, Vol.30 (6), p.633-641</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis 2015</rights><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sukuroglu, Elcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Guliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askın, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin</title><title>Journal of adhesion science and technology</title><description>This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests considering the factors 'core preparation time', 'luting cement', and 'root level' (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p &lt; 0.001), time of core preparation (p &lt; 0.001), and root level (p &lt; 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength results. R cement was more significantly affected by core preparation time (Ri: 2.91 ± 1.1; Rd: 4.83 ± 1.68) compared to V cement (Vi: 2.92 ± 1.63; Vd: 2.65 ± 1.6) (p &lt; 0.05). Coronal region demonstrated significantly higher bond strength values than those of middle and apical third in all groups (coronal: 4 ± 1.9; middle: 3.1 ± 1.4; apical: 2.4 ± 1.1) (p &lt; 0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was the most frequent (64%) followed by adhesive failure between cement and post (18%). Delayed core preparation can improve bond strength of FRC posts to intraradicular dentin when cemented with self-adhesive cement compared to conventional dual-polymerized resin cement.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Cementing</subject><subject>Cements</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>fiber-reinforced composite posts</subject><subject>intraradicular root</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>post-core</subject><subject>resin cement</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Time measurements</subject><issn>0169-4243</issn><issn>1568-5616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9rFTEQx0NR6LP6JwgBLz24z8xmk5e9VUqrQsGLnkM2P9qUbLImWeVB__hmefXiwdMMzGc-DPNF6D2QPRBBPhHg49APdN8TYHsAYBz4Gdq1Krqtf4V2G9Nt0Dl6U8ojIUA5gR16unHO6oqTw9XPPt5jlzLWKVu8ZLuorKpP8SMOa92G2s42VlyPi8UqGpxTqjjY3zbgFLEyD7Y0fLM5P9mMl1RqwTVhH2tuMuP1GlTGpll8fIteOxWKffdSL9DP25sf11-7u-9fvl1_vuv0AKJ2I-eOUS0GZwYwYiKaWzIx6zQdBsMNhYmYqT-I3gk9wUj7A7BR62liVAlq6AW6PHmXnH6ttlQ5-6JtCCratBYJB8FBiIOgDf3wD_qY1hzbdY1iZGTjKESj2InSOZWSrZNL9rPKRwlEbpnIv5nILRP5kknbuzrt-djePKs_KQcjqzqGlF1WUfsi6f8VzzcalDI</recordid><startdate>20160318</startdate><enddate>20160318</enddate><creator>Sukuroglu, Elcin</creator><creator>Aktas, Guliz</creator><creator>Askın, Kerem</creator><creator>Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti</creator><creator>Özcan, Mutlu</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160318</creationdate><title>Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin</title><author>Sukuroglu, Elcin ; Aktas, Guliz ; Askın, Kerem ; Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti ; Özcan, Mutlu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Cementing</topic><topic>Cements</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>fiber-reinforced composite posts</topic><topic>intraradicular root</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>post-core</topic><topic>resin cement</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Time measurements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sukuroglu, Elcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Guliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askın, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of adhesion science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sukuroglu, Elcin</au><au>Aktas, Guliz</au><au>Askın, Kerem</au><au>Queiroz, José Renato Cavalcanti</au><au>Özcan, Mutlu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adhesion science and technology</jtitle><date>2016-03-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>633-641</pages><issn>0169-4243</issn><eissn>1568-5616</eissn><abstract>This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests considering the factors 'core preparation time', 'luting cement', and 'root level' (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p &lt; 0.001), time of core preparation (p &lt; 0.001), and root level (p &lt; 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength results. R cement was more significantly affected by core preparation time (Ri: 2.91 ± 1.1; Rd: 4.83 ± 1.68) compared to V cement (Vi: 2.92 ± 1.63; Vd: 2.65 ± 1.6) (p &lt; 0.05). Coronal region demonstrated significantly higher bond strength values than those of middle and apical third in all groups (coronal: 4 ± 1.9; middle: 3.1 ± 1.4; apical: 2.4 ± 1.1) (p &lt; 0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was the most frequent (64%) followed by adhesive failure between cement and post (18%). Delayed core preparation can improve bond strength of FRC posts to intraradicular dentin when cemented with self-adhesive cement compared to conventional dual-polymerized resin cement.</abstract><cop>Utrecht</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/01694243.2015.1115616</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-4243
ispartof Journal of adhesion science and technology, 2016-03, Vol.30 (6), p.633-641
issn 0169-4243
1568-5616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1750959988
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Adhesion
Adhesives
Bond strength
Bonding strength
Cement
Cementing
Cements
Dentin
fiber-reinforced composite posts
intraradicular root
Polymers
post-core
resin cement
Resins
Roots
Time measurements
title Effect of timing for core preparation, luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20timing%20for%20core%20preparation,%20luting%20cement%20type%20and%20root%20level%20on%20adhesion%20of%20fiber%20posts%20to%20intraradicular%20dentin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adhesion%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Sukuroglu,%20Elcin&rft.date=2016-03-18&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=633-641&rft.issn=0169-4243&rft.eissn=1568-5616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01694243.2015.1115616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1786188783%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-966f53c84fd41d8b0c6e0b5efc344d6d31b0db2782f8cb19327159ccbb53a83d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750959988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true