Loading…
Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy
Allowing students to grade their own homework promises many advantages. But can students perform such grading tasks honestly and accurately? Also, do such assessments vary by gender? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed the homework scores of 266 students in seven introductory programming...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of education for business 2016-01, Vol.91 (1), p.52-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3 |
container_end_page | 58 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Journal of education for business |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Simkin, Mark Stiver, Debra |
description | Allowing students to grade their own homework promises many advantages. But can students perform such grading tasks honestly and accurately? Also, do such assessments vary by gender? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed the homework scores of 266 students in seven introductory programming classes. The statistical results were favorable to the hypothesis that students graded themselves fairly. Gender differences were slight, and more likely attributable to factors not connected with grading equity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08832323.2015.1110554 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1751730995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1084183</ericid><sourcerecordid>3904818001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCJUicU7ZtePY4QSq-FUlDoWz5Tg2pCRNsVOhvj2OUjiiPXjlnfGOP0JmCHMECVcgJaOx5hSQzxEROM-OyASLDFLGeH5MJoMmHUSn5CyENQBwQDEh-co2Ln33urJV8tG19rvzn9fJKnaJbbe1r41ukt6GPiSdS6xz8cLsz8mJ002wF4dzSt7u714Xj-ny5eFpcbtMDSuwT3mhGS9FYbmlVJaFo1nMIZyRwLRAIR1yWhqdU5qhNDnkFS2BoZRCcmEsm5LL8d2t7752MYVadzu_iSsVCo6CQVHwqOKjyvguBG-d2vq61X6vENSASP0iUgMidUAUfbPRZ-M3_zx3z9ES47A4vxnn9cZ1vtWRTVOpXu-bzjuvN6YOiv2_4geasnPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751730995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Simkin, Mark ; Stiver, Debra</creator><creatorcontrib>Simkin, Mark ; Stiver, Debra</creatorcontrib><description>Allowing students to grade their own homework promises many advantages. But can students perform such grading tasks honestly and accurately? Also, do such assessments vary by gender? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed the homework scores of 266 students in seven introductory programming classes. The statistical results were favorable to the hypothesis that students graded themselves fairly. Gender differences were slight, and more likely attributable to factors not connected with grading equity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2015.1110554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic grading ; collaborative learning ; College Students ; Equity ; Gender Differences ; grading equity ; Homework ; Introductory Courses ; Programming ; Regression (Statistics) ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; self-assessment ; self-grading ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; United States (West)</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for business, 2016-01, Vol.91 (1), p.52-58</ispartof><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1084183$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simkin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Debra</creatorcontrib><title>Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy</title><title>Journal of education for business</title><description>Allowing students to grade their own homework promises many advantages. But can students perform such grading tasks honestly and accurately? Also, do such assessments vary by gender? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed the homework scores of 266 students in seven introductory programming classes. The statistical results were favorable to the hypothesis that students graded themselves fairly. Gender differences were slight, and more likely attributable to factors not connected with grading equity.</description><subject>Academic grading</subject><subject>collaborative learning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>grading equity</subject><subject>Homework</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>self-assessment</subject><subject>self-grading</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>United States (West)</subject><issn>0883-2323</issn><issn>1940-3356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCJUicU7ZtePY4QSq-FUlDoWz5Tg2pCRNsVOhvj2OUjiiPXjlnfGOP0JmCHMECVcgJaOx5hSQzxEROM-OyASLDFLGeH5MJoMmHUSn5CyENQBwQDEh-co2Ln33urJV8tG19rvzn9fJKnaJbbe1r41ukt6GPiSdS6xz8cLsz8mJ002wF4dzSt7u714Xj-ny5eFpcbtMDSuwT3mhGS9FYbmlVJaFo1nMIZyRwLRAIR1yWhqdU5qhNDnkFS2BoZRCcmEsm5LL8d2t7752MYVadzu_iSsVCo6CQVHwqOKjyvguBG-d2vq61X6vENSASP0iUgMidUAUfbPRZ-M3_zx3z9ES47A4vxnn9cZ1vtWRTVOpXu-bzjuvN6YOiv2_4geasnPU</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Simkin, Mark</creator><creator>Stiver, Debra</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy</title><author>Simkin, Mark ; Stiver, Debra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic grading</topic><topic>collaborative learning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>grading equity</topic><topic>Homework</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>self-assessment</topic><topic>self-grading</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>United States (West)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simkin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Debra</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simkin, Mark</au><au>Stiver, Debra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1084183</ericid><atitle>Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for business</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>52-58</pages><issn>0883-2323</issn><eissn>1940-3356</eissn><abstract>Allowing students to grade their own homework promises many advantages. But can students perform such grading tasks honestly and accurately? Also, do such assessments vary by gender? To answer these questions, the authors analyzed the homework scores of 266 students in seven introductory programming classes. The statistical results were favorable to the hypothesis that students graded themselves fairly. Gender differences were slight, and more likely attributable to factors not connected with grading equity.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08832323.2015.1110554</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-2323 |
ispartof | Journal of education for business, 2016-01, Vol.91 (1), p.52-58 |
issn | 0883-2323 1940-3356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1751730995 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Academic grading collaborative learning College Students Equity Gender Differences grading equity Homework Introductory Courses Programming Regression (Statistics) Self Evaluation (Individuals) self-assessment self-grading Student Evaluation Students United States (West) |
title | Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A43%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-graded%20homework:%20Some%20empirical%20tests%20of%20efficacy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20business&rft.au=Simkin,%20Mark&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=52-58&rft.issn=0883-2323&rft.eissn=1940-3356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08832323.2015.1110554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3904818001%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-59a35b79e5e228b9f248837fc803a7178f152bca622418c606d2b031887857ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751730995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1084183&rfr_iscdi=true |