Loading…

Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER

Objective: To describe the development of a new measure, the TICOMETER, a brief assessment tool that can measure trauma-informed care (TIC) in health and human service organizations at a single point in time or repeatedly as well as determine training needs. Methods: With the input of an expert pane...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology of violence 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.150-157
Main Authors: Bassuk, Ellen L., Unick, George J., Paquette, Kristen, Richard, Molly K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-36de28c944e4b9c78fcc67896a27c55d4e077b73ba203b7329c406963c8ec26d3
cites
container_end_page 157
container_issue 1
container_start_page 150
container_title Psychology of violence
container_volume 7
creator Bassuk, Ellen L.
Unick, George J.
Paquette, Kristen
Richard, Molly K.
description Objective: To describe the development of a new measure, the TICOMETER, a brief assessment tool that can measure trauma-informed care (TIC) in health and human service organizations at a single point in time or repeatedly as well as determine training needs. Methods: With the input of an expert panel we selected relevant items and domains. Initially we organized the instrument into 5 domains consisting of 189 items that were then scored by 424 service providers representing 68 organizations. Using an iterative approach, we selected the 35 psychometrically strongest items across 5 domains. Within each domain a set of rating scale models (RSM), confirmatory factor analytic models (CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability statistics, and receiver operating curves were used to assesse the item fit, reliability, and face and construct validity of the TICOMETER. Results: The 5 TICOMETER domains had high reliability along with good item and CFA fit. Strong associations between domain scores and a priori rankings demonstrated validity of the domains. Conclusion: The TICOMETER has strong psychometric properties, creating new possibilities for assessing the level of TIC offered by an organization, monitoring progress in service delivery over time, determining training needs, and developing trauma-informed policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/vio0000030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1758362082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1758362082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-36de28c944e4b9c78fcc67896a27c55d4e077b73ba203b7329c406963c8ec26d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWGov_oIFb0J0P5Js4k1itYGWgkbwtmw3kzYl2Y27SaH-ehMqdi7v8PIwDI_n3RL8QDDjj4fK4HEYvvAmlITUxzH5uvzfaXztzZzbj0yACWXRxNu9wAFq01Z6i6RGmXad7RvQHeoMWoF0vQW0tlupqx_ZVUbLGuVW9o30M10a20CBUjkwlUaLodXoA-yhUuCeUL4DlGfpejXP5-833lUpawezv5x6n6_zPF34y_Vblj4vfclY2PksKoDGKgkCCDaJ4nGpVMTjJJKUqzAsAsCcbzjbSIrZkDRRAY6SiKkYFI0KNvXuTndba757cJ3Ym94ObztBeBiziA4iBur-RClrnLNQitZWjbRHQbAYZYqzzDMsWylad1TSdpWqwane2kHVyAouiCAhZr8dtHV3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1758362082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER</title><source>EBSCO - PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Bassuk, Ellen L. ; Unick, George J. ; Paquette, Kristen ; Richard, Molly K.</creator><contributor>Hamby, Sherry</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bassuk, Ellen L. ; Unick, George J. ; Paquette, Kristen ; Richard, Molly K. ; Hamby, Sherry</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To describe the development of a new measure, the TICOMETER, a brief assessment tool that can measure trauma-informed care (TIC) in health and human service organizations at a single point in time or repeatedly as well as determine training needs. Methods: With the input of an expert panel we selected relevant items and domains. Initially we organized the instrument into 5 domains consisting of 189 items that were then scored by 424 service providers representing 68 organizations. Using an iterative approach, we selected the 35 psychometrically strongest items across 5 domains. Within each domain a set of rating scale models (RSM), confirmatory factor analytic models (CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability statistics, and receiver operating curves were used to assesse the item fit, reliability, and face and construct validity of the TICOMETER. Results: The 5 TICOMETER domains had high reliability along with good item and CFA fit. Strong associations between domain scores and a priori rankings demonstrated validity of the domains. Conclusion: The TICOMETER has strong psychometric properties, creating new possibilities for assessing the level of TIC offered by an organization, monitoring progress in service delivery over time, determining training needs, and developing trauma-informed policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-0828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-081X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/vio0000030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Factor Analysis ; Health Care Services ; Human ; Human Services ; Measurement ; Organizations ; Rating Scales ; Test Construction ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Trauma ; Trauma-Informed Care</subject><ispartof>Psychology of violence, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.150-157</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-36de28c944e4b9c78fcc67896a27c55d4e077b73ba203b7329c406963c8ec26d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1842,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hamby, Sherry</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bassuk, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unick, George J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Molly K.</creatorcontrib><title>Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER</title><title>Psychology of violence</title><description>Objective: To describe the development of a new measure, the TICOMETER, a brief assessment tool that can measure trauma-informed care (TIC) in health and human service organizations at a single point in time or repeatedly as well as determine training needs. Methods: With the input of an expert panel we selected relevant items and domains. Initially we organized the instrument into 5 domains consisting of 189 items that were then scored by 424 service providers representing 68 organizations. Using an iterative approach, we selected the 35 psychometrically strongest items across 5 domains. Within each domain a set of rating scale models (RSM), confirmatory factor analytic models (CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability statistics, and receiver operating curves were used to assesse the item fit, reliability, and face and construct validity of the TICOMETER. Results: The 5 TICOMETER domains had high reliability along with good item and CFA fit. Strong associations between domain scores and a priori rankings demonstrated validity of the domains. Conclusion: The TICOMETER has strong psychometric properties, creating new possibilities for assessing the level of TIC offered by an organization, monitoring progress in service delivery over time, determining training needs, and developing trauma-informed policies.</description><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Services</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma-Informed Care</subject><issn>2152-0828</issn><issn>2152-081X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWGov_oIFb0J0P5Js4k1itYGWgkbwtmw3kzYl2Y27SaH-ehMqdi7v8PIwDI_n3RL8QDDjj4fK4HEYvvAmlITUxzH5uvzfaXztzZzbj0yACWXRxNu9wAFq01Z6i6RGmXad7RvQHeoMWoF0vQW0tlupqx_ZVUbLGuVW9o30M10a20CBUjkwlUaLodXoA-yhUuCeUL4DlGfpejXP5-833lUpawezv5x6n6_zPF34y_Vblj4vfclY2PksKoDGKgkCCDaJ4nGpVMTjJJKUqzAsAsCcbzjbSIrZkDRRAY6SiKkYFI0KNvXuTndba757cJ3Ym94ObztBeBiziA4iBur-RClrnLNQitZWjbRHQbAYZYqzzDMsWylad1TSdpWqwane2kHVyAouiCAhZr8dtHV3</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Bassuk, Ellen L.</creator><creator>Unick, George J.</creator><creator>Paquette, Kristen</creator><creator>Richard, Molly K.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER</title><author>Bassuk, Ellen L. ; Unick, George J. ; Paquette, Kristen ; Richard, Molly K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-36de28c944e4b9c78fcc67896a27c55d4e077b73ba203b7329c406963c8ec26d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Services</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma-Informed Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bassuk, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unick, George J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Molly K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychology of violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bassuk, Ellen L.</au><au>Unick, George J.</au><au>Paquette, Kristen</au><au>Richard, Molly K.</au><au>Hamby, Sherry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of violence</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>150-157</pages><issn>2152-0828</issn><eissn>2152-081X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To describe the development of a new measure, the TICOMETER, a brief assessment tool that can measure trauma-informed care (TIC) in health and human service organizations at a single point in time or repeatedly as well as determine training needs. Methods: With the input of an expert panel we selected relevant items and domains. Initially we organized the instrument into 5 domains consisting of 189 items that were then scored by 424 service providers representing 68 organizations. Using an iterative approach, we selected the 35 psychometrically strongest items across 5 domains. Within each domain a set of rating scale models (RSM), confirmatory factor analytic models (CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability statistics, and receiver operating curves were used to assesse the item fit, reliability, and face and construct validity of the TICOMETER. Results: The 5 TICOMETER domains had high reliability along with good item and CFA fit. Strong associations between domain scores and a priori rankings demonstrated validity of the domains. Conclusion: The TICOMETER has strong psychometric properties, creating new possibilities for assessing the level of TIC offered by an organization, monitoring progress in service delivery over time, determining training needs, and developing trauma-informed policies.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/vio0000030</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2152-0828
ispartof Psychology of violence, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.150-157
issn 2152-0828
2152-081X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1758362082
source EBSCO - PsycARTICLES
subjects Factor Analysis
Health Care Services
Human
Human Services
Measurement
Organizations
Rating Scales
Test Construction
Test Reliability
Test Validity
Trauma
Trauma-Informed Care
title Developing an Instrument to Measure Organizational Trauma-Informed Care in Human Services: The TICOMETER
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20an%20Instrument%20to%20Measure%20Organizational%20Trauma-Informed%20Care%20in%20Human%20Services:%20The%20TICOMETER&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20violence&rft.au=Bassuk,%20Ellen%20L.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=150-157&rft.issn=2152-0828&rft.eissn=2152-081X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/vio0000030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1758362082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-36de28c944e4b9c78fcc67896a27c55d4e077b73ba203b7329c406963c8ec26d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1758362082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true