Loading…

A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models

Model-driven engineering (MDE) promotes automated model transformations along the entire development process. Guaranteeing the quality of early models is essential for a successful application of MDE techniques and related tool-supported model refinements. Do these models properly reflect the requir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on software engineering 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.2-25
Main Authors: Autili, Marco, Bertolino, Antonia, De Angelis, Guglielmo, Di Ruscio, Davide, Di Sandro, Alessio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title IEEE transactions on software engineering
container_volume 42
creator Autili, Marco
Bertolino, Antonia
De Angelis, Guglielmo
Di Ruscio, Davide
Di Sandro, Alessio
description Model-driven engineering (MDE) promotes automated model transformations along the entire development process. Guaranteeing the quality of early models is essential for a successful application of MDE techniques and related tool-supported model refinements. Do these models properly reflect the requirements elicited from the owners of the problem domain? Ultimately, this question needs to be asked to the domain experts. The problem is that a gap exists between the respective backgrounds of modeling experts and domain experts. MDE developers cannot show a model to the domain experts and simply ask them whether it is correct with respect to the requirements they had in mind. To facilitate their interaction and make such validation more systematic, we propose a methodology and a tool that derive a set of customizable questionnaires expressed in natural language from each model to be validated. Unexpected answers by domain experts help to identify those portions of the models requiring deeper attention. We illustrate the methodology and the current status of the developed tool MOTHIA, which can handle UML Use Case, Class, and Activity diagrams. We assess MOTHIA effectiveness in reducing the gap between domain and modeling experts, and in detecting modeling faults on the European Project CHOReOS.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TSE.2015.2449319
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1761091037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7132782</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3936530191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3wUvAc-eXpFn6HcecP2BDcFOPIW2_zI6umWl32H9vx8TTe3ne94WHsVsBIyEAH1bL2UiC0COZpqgEnrGBQIWJ0hLO2QAAs0TrDC_ZVdtuAEAbowfsa8JXIdTJcr_bhdhRyRfUfYcy1GF94D5E_unqqnRdFRrumpK_k68a2lLT8eD5zMX6kCw7tyb-GLauavgilFS31-zCu7qlm78cso-n2Wr6kszfnl-nk3lSSBRdIiTk0hOgR18KTzLzuR9jXkgoNBlFqTRljhLHuVEmF17kpFJwaDL0OvNqyO5Pu7sYfvbUdnYT9rHpL60w416MAGV6Ck5UEUPbRvJ2F6utiwcrwB712V6fPeqzf_r6yt2pUhHRP26EkiaT6hec82ts</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761091037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Autili, Marco ; Bertolino, Antonia ; De Angelis, Guglielmo ; Di Ruscio, Davide ; Di Sandro, Alessio</creator><creatorcontrib>Autili, Marco ; Bertolino, Antonia ; De Angelis, Guglielmo ; Di Ruscio, Davide ; Di Sandro, Alessio</creatorcontrib><description>Model-driven engineering (MDE) promotes automated model transformations along the entire development process. Guaranteeing the quality of early models is essential for a successful application of MDE techniques and related tool-supported model refinements. Do these models properly reflect the requirements elicited from the owners of the problem domain? Ultimately, this question needs to be asked to the domain experts. The problem is that a gap exists between the respective backgrounds of modeling experts and domain experts. MDE developers cannot show a model to the domain experts and simply ask them whether it is correct with respect to the requirements they had in mind. To facilitate their interaction and make such validation more systematic, we propose a methodology and a tool that derive a set of customizable questionnaires expressed in natural language from each model to be validated. Unexpected answers by domain experts help to identify those portions of the models requiring deeper attention. We illustrate the methodology and the current status of the developed tool MOTHIA, which can handle UML Use Case, Class, and Activity diagrams. We assess MOTHIA effectiveness in reducing the gap between domain and modeling experts, and in detecting modeling faults on the European Project CHOReOS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-5589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-3520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2015.2449319</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IESEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automation ; Biological system modeling ; Context ; Context modeling ; Domain Modeling ; Early Stage Model ; Engines ; Load modeling ; Model Driven Engineering ; Model Refinement ; Model Validation ; Natural language ; Natural Language Questionnaires ; Semantic Model Quality ; Semantics ; Software engineering ; Software quality ; Studies ; Subject specialists ; Unified modeling language</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.2-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright IEEE Computer Society Jan 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7132782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Autili, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolino, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Angelis, Guglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Ruscio, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Sandro, Alessio</creatorcontrib><title>A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models</title><title>IEEE transactions on software engineering</title><addtitle>TSE</addtitle><description>Model-driven engineering (MDE) promotes automated model transformations along the entire development process. Guaranteeing the quality of early models is essential for a successful application of MDE techniques and related tool-supported model refinements. Do these models properly reflect the requirements elicited from the owners of the problem domain? Ultimately, this question needs to be asked to the domain experts. The problem is that a gap exists between the respective backgrounds of modeling experts and domain experts. MDE developers cannot show a model to the domain experts and simply ask them whether it is correct with respect to the requirements they had in mind. To facilitate their interaction and make such validation more systematic, we propose a methodology and a tool that derive a set of customizable questionnaires expressed in natural language from each model to be validated. Unexpected answers by domain experts help to identify those portions of the models requiring deeper attention. We illustrate the methodology and the current status of the developed tool MOTHIA, which can handle UML Use Case, Class, and Activity diagrams. We assess MOTHIA effectiveness in reducing the gap between domain and modeling experts, and in detecting modeling faults on the European Project CHOReOS.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biological system modeling</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Context modeling</subject><subject>Domain Modeling</subject><subject>Early Stage Model</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>Load modeling</subject><subject>Model Driven Engineering</subject><subject>Model Refinement</subject><subject>Model Validation</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Natural Language Questionnaires</subject><subject>Semantic Model Quality</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software quality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subject specialists</subject><subject>Unified modeling language</subject><issn>0098-5589</issn><issn>1939-3520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3wUvAc-eXpFn6HcecP2BDcFOPIW2_zI6umWl32H9vx8TTe3ne94WHsVsBIyEAH1bL2UiC0COZpqgEnrGBQIWJ0hLO2QAAs0TrDC_ZVdtuAEAbowfsa8JXIdTJcr_bhdhRyRfUfYcy1GF94D5E_unqqnRdFRrumpK_k68a2lLT8eD5zMX6kCw7tyb-GLauavgilFS31-zCu7qlm78cso-n2Wr6kszfnl-nk3lSSBRdIiTk0hOgR18KTzLzuR9jXkgoNBlFqTRljhLHuVEmF17kpFJwaDL0OvNqyO5Pu7sYfvbUdnYT9rHpL60w416MAGV6Ck5UEUPbRvJ2F6utiwcrwB712V6fPeqzf_r6yt2pUhHRP26EkiaT6hec82ts</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Autili, Marco</creator><creator>Bertolino, Antonia</creator><creator>De Angelis, Guglielmo</creator><creator>Di Ruscio, Davide</creator><creator>Di Sandro, Alessio</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models</title><author>Autili, Marco ; Bertolino, Antonia ; De Angelis, Guglielmo ; Di Ruscio, Davide ; Di Sandro, Alessio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biological system modeling</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Context modeling</topic><topic>Domain Modeling</topic><topic>Early Stage Model</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>Load modeling</topic><topic>Model Driven Engineering</topic><topic>Model Refinement</topic><topic>Model Validation</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Natural Language Questionnaires</topic><topic>Semantic Model Quality</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software quality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subject specialists</topic><topic>Unified modeling language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Autili, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolino, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Angelis, Guglielmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Ruscio, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Sandro, Alessio</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Autili, Marco</au><au>Bertolino, Antonia</au><au>De Angelis, Guglielmo</au><au>Di Ruscio, Davide</au><au>Di Sandro, Alessio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle><stitle>TSE</stitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>2-25</pages><issn>0098-5589</issn><eissn>1939-3520</eissn><coden>IESEDJ</coden><abstract>Model-driven engineering (MDE) promotes automated model transformations along the entire development process. Guaranteeing the quality of early models is essential for a successful application of MDE techniques and related tool-supported model refinements. Do these models properly reflect the requirements elicited from the owners of the problem domain? Ultimately, this question needs to be asked to the domain experts. The problem is that a gap exists between the respective backgrounds of modeling experts and domain experts. MDE developers cannot show a model to the domain experts and simply ask them whether it is correct with respect to the requirements they had in mind. To facilitate their interaction and make such validation more systematic, we propose a methodology and a tool that derive a set of customizable questionnaires expressed in natural language from each model to be validated. Unexpected answers by domain experts help to identify those portions of the models requiring deeper attention. We illustrate the methodology and the current status of the developed tool MOTHIA, which can handle UML Use Case, Class, and Activity diagrams. We assess MOTHIA effectiveness in reducing the gap between domain and modeling experts, and in detecting modeling faults on the European Project CHOReOS.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TSE.2015.2449319</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-5589
ispartof IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2016-01, Vol.42 (1), p.2-25
issn 0098-5589
1939-3520
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1761091037
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Automation
Biological system modeling
Context
Context modeling
Domain Modeling
Early Stage Model
Engines
Load modeling
Model Driven Engineering
Model Refinement
Model Validation
Natural language
Natural Language Questionnaires
Semantic Model Quality
Semantics
Software engineering
Software quality
Studies
Subject specialists
Unified modeling language
title A Tool-Supported Methodology for Validation and Refinement of Early-Stage Domain Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A40%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Tool-Supported%20Methodology%20for%20Validation%20and%20Refinement%20of%20Early-Stage%20Domain%20Models&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20software%20engineering&rft.au=Autili,%20Marco&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=2-25&rft.issn=0098-5589&rft.eissn=1939-3520&rft.coden=IESEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TSE.2015.2449319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E3936530191%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-120b2fe09f9fd1fe28fbf69bc20c5e73e427db9296b737b1f1be340a9789f58f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761091037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7132782&rfr_iscdi=true