Loading…

Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach

Measures of leader reward and punishment omission and behavioral integrity have demonstrated sound psychometric properties and interesting relationships in recent studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of these new measures are first examined, supporting previous findings. Hypotheses an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Leadership quarterly 2015-12, Vol.26 (6), p.991-1004
Main Authors: Hinkin, Timothy R., Schriesheim, Chester A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253
container_end_page 1004
container_issue 6
container_start_page 991
container_title The Leadership quarterly
container_volume 26
creator Hinkin, Timothy R.
Schriesheim, Chester A.
description Measures of leader reward and punishment omission and behavioral integrity have demonstrated sound psychometric properties and interesting relationships in recent studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of these new measures are first examined, supporting previous findings. Hypotheses and theoretical models incorporating these constructs, along with contingent reward and punishment, are developed and tested using a social exchange theory framework and a sample of 456 workers in 15 Northeastern U.S. restaurants. It was found that contingent reward, contingent punishment, and reward omission impact perceptions of behavioral integrity. It was also found that trust partially mediates the relationship between behavioral integrity and subordinate perceptions of organizational commitment and satisfaction (but not leader effectiveness). Limitations of the study are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1762368782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1048984315001216</els_id><sourcerecordid>3941799691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhhdRUKv_wEPAa7dONrtp1oMg4hcUvOg5TpJZm9JuarIr-u9NqWdPMwzvB_MUxQWHGQcur1azNeHniLMKeJNPMwB5UJxwNRelqKE9zDvUqmxVLY6L05RWAFkp1EnxviB0FFkk33chWtpQP0yZoSV--RBxzXw_0Ef0w8-UYe9YGk2Izvc4EAvjYMOG0jW7ZSlYn9X0bZfYfxDD7TYGtMuz4qjDdaLzvzkp3h7uX--eysXL4_Pd7aK0QjZDKSVWTs6lkZ0QrjOIlamr1oDiqjEO0LSgwAqLkoNsHG-d69AaMhJAVY2YFJf73Fz7OVIa9CqMsc-Vms9lJaSaqyqr6r3KxpBSpE5vo99g_NEc9I6lXuk9S71jubtmltl2s7dR_uDLU9TJeuotOR_JDtoF_3_AL75egDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762368782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hinkin, Timothy R. ; Schriesheim, Chester A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinkin, Timothy R. ; Schriesheim, Chester A.</creatorcontrib><description>Measures of leader reward and punishment omission and behavioral integrity have demonstrated sound psychometric properties and interesting relationships in recent studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of these new measures are first examined, supporting previous findings. Hypotheses and theoretical models incorporating these constructs, along with contingent reward and punishment, are developed and tested using a social exchange theory framework and a sample of 456 workers in 15 Northeastern U.S. restaurants. It was found that contingent reward, contingent punishment, and reward omission impact perceptions of behavioral integrity. It was also found that trust partially mediates the relationship between behavioral integrity and subordinate perceptions of organizational commitment and satisfaction (but not leader effectiveness). Limitations of the study are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-9843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavioral integrity ; Job satisfaction ; Leader reinforcement ; Leadership ; Omission ; Organizational behavior ; Quantitative psychology ; Social exchange theory ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Leadership quarterly, 2015-12, Vol.26 (6), p.991-1004</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinkin, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriesheim, Chester A.</creatorcontrib><title>Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach</title><title>The Leadership quarterly</title><description>Measures of leader reward and punishment omission and behavioral integrity have demonstrated sound psychometric properties and interesting relationships in recent studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of these new measures are first examined, supporting previous findings. Hypotheses and theoretical models incorporating these constructs, along with contingent reward and punishment, are developed and tested using a social exchange theory framework and a sample of 456 workers in 15 Northeastern U.S. restaurants. It was found that contingent reward, contingent punishment, and reward omission impact perceptions of behavioral integrity. It was also found that trust partially mediates the relationship between behavioral integrity and subordinate perceptions of organizational commitment and satisfaction (but not leader effectiveness). Limitations of the study are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.</description><subject>Behavioral integrity</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Leader reinforcement</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Omission</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1048-9843</issn><issn>1873-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhhdRUKv_wEPAa7dONrtp1oMg4hcUvOg5TpJZm9JuarIr-u9NqWdPMwzvB_MUxQWHGQcur1azNeHniLMKeJNPMwB5UJxwNRelqKE9zDvUqmxVLY6L05RWAFkp1EnxviB0FFkk33chWtpQP0yZoSV--RBxzXw_0Ef0w8-UYe9YGk2Izvc4EAvjYMOG0jW7ZSlYn9X0bZfYfxDD7TYGtMuz4qjDdaLzvzkp3h7uX--eysXL4_Pd7aK0QjZDKSVWTs6lkZ0QrjOIlamr1oDiqjEO0LSgwAqLkoNsHG-d69AaMhJAVY2YFJf73Fz7OVIa9CqMsc-Vms9lJaSaqyqr6r3KxpBSpE5vo99g_NEc9I6lXuk9S71jubtmltl2s7dR_uDLU9TJeuotOR_JDtoF_3_AL75egDc</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Hinkin, Timothy R.</creator><creator>Schriesheim, Chester A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach</title><author>Hinkin, Timothy R. ; Schriesheim, Chester A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavioral integrity</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Leader reinforcement</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Omission</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinkin, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriesheim, Chester A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinkin, Timothy R.</au><au>Schriesheim, Chester A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach</atitle><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>991</spage><epage>1004</epage><pages>991-1004</pages><issn>1048-9843</issn><eissn>1873-3409</eissn><abstract>Measures of leader reward and punishment omission and behavioral integrity have demonstrated sound psychometric properties and interesting relationships in recent studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of these new measures are first examined, supporting previous findings. Hypotheses and theoretical models incorporating these constructs, along with contingent reward and punishment, are developed and tested using a social exchange theory framework and a sample of 456 workers in 15 Northeastern U.S. restaurants. It was found that contingent reward, contingent punishment, and reward omission impact perceptions of behavioral integrity. It was also found that trust partially mediates the relationship between behavioral integrity and subordinate perceptions of organizational commitment and satisfaction (but not leader effectiveness). Limitations of the study are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.006</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1048-9843
ispartof The Leadership quarterly, 2015-12, Vol.26 (6), p.991-1004
issn 1048-9843
1873-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1762368782
source Elsevier
subjects Behavioral integrity
Job satisfaction
Leader reinforcement
Leadership
Omission
Organizational behavior
Quantitative psychology
Social exchange theory
Studies
title Leader reinforcement, behavioral integrity, and subordinate outcomes: A social exchange approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leader%20reinforcement,%20behavioral%20integrity,%20and%20subordinate%20outcomes:%20A%20social%20exchange%20approach&rft.jtitle=The%20Leadership%20quarterly&rft.au=Hinkin,%20Timothy%20R.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=991&rft.epage=1004&rft.pages=991-1004&rft.issn=1048-9843&rft.eissn=1873-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3941799691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-66a2d676b6f33dfbaa2b429b08185bd0ab9080c3ca61065d19ddfacbeb6008253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762368782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true