Phenomenology, Meaning, and Measure: Response to Maxime Doyon and Thomas Sheehan

This paper responds to comments by Maxime Doyon and Thomas Sheehan on aspects of my book, Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger (Cambridge University Press, 2013). Among the topics discussed are the relations between phenomenology and analytic philosophy, the difference between a Br...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy today (Celina) 2016-12, Vol.60 (1), p.237-252
Main Author: Crowell, Steven
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Consciousness
Heidegger, Martin (1889-1976)
Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938)
Phenomenology
Philosophers
Philosophy
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper responds to comments by Maxime Doyon and Thomas Sheehan on aspects of my book, Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger (Cambridge University Press, 2013). Among the topics discussed are the relations between phenomenology and analytic philosophy, the difference between a Brentanian and an Husserlian approach to intentional content, the normative structure of the intentional content of noetic states such as thinking and imagining, the implications of taking a phenomenological approach to Heidegger's concept of "being," Heidegger's "correlationism," and the normative character of Heidegger's analysis of Angst, death, and conscience.
ISSN:0031-8256
2329-8596
DOI:10.5840/philtoday2016115107