Loading…
Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash
As dicamba resistance traits become more common in agronomic crops, the potential for off-site movement also increases. Little is known of how common vegetable crops will respond to dicamba drift. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dicamba and glyphosate drift on bell pepper a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2016-03, Vol.30 (1), p.217-223 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3 |
container_end_page | 223 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Dittmar, Peter J Ferrell, Jason A Fernandez, Jose V Smith, Hunter |
description | As dicamba resistance traits become more common in agronomic crops, the potential for off-site movement also increases. Little is known of how common vegetable crops will respond to dicamba drift. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dicamba and glyphosate drift on bell pepper and squash growth as a function of application timing. The treatments were arranged in a factorial design with two timings by three rates and a nontreated check. The two timings were early bloom and midbloom (during bloom when fruit were present). The three rates were glyphosate at 21 + dicamba at 14 g ha−1, glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1, and glyphosate at 7 + dicamba 5 at g ha−1. Herbicides were applied with a controlled droplet applicator calibrated to deliver 2.34 L ha−1. In squash, crop injury was 26 to 31% at 3 DAT and 48 to 65% at 17 DAT. However, no differences were measured among application timings or rates for fruit weight or number at individual harvest or season total. Bell pepper injury ranged between 0 and 8% from 3 to 17 DAT and was not significantly different than the nontreated. However, large, Fancy, marketable, and total bell pepper fruit number were greater in the nontreated than glyphosate at 21 + dicamba 14 at g ha−1 and glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1 both years. The three rates of dicamba + glyphosate had a greater number and weight of cull fruit compared to the number of fruit in the nontreated plots. The cull fruit were shorter with a flattened appearance. Leaving bell pepper fruit on the plants longer may result in small and medium fruit becoming large or Fancy grade bell pepper fruit. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; dicamba; bell pepper, Capsicum anuum L.; squash, Cucumis melo L. Al volverse más común la resistencia a dicamba en cultivos agronómicos, el potencial de movimiento del herbicida a lugares no deseados se incrementa. Se conoce poco de cómo responderán los cultivos de vegetales a la deriva de dicamba. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la deriva de dicamba y glyphosate en el crecimiento del pimiento y la calabaza en función del momento de aplicación. Los tratamientos fueron arreglados en un diseño factorial con dos momentos de aplicación y tres dosis y un testigo sin tratamiento. Los dos momentos de aplicación fueron floración temprana y floración media (durante la floración cuando hubo presencia de frutos). Las tres dosis fueron glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1, glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-D-15-00085.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1766808792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24855995</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24855995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUh4MoOKdnT2LAc9xL0rTJUTedgqC4DfUU0pq4jq6pSYf439ut4tXT4_H7fu_Bh9AphUua0mT0MicTQgUBACku6R4aUCGAsCyBfTQAqYAAz14P0VGMKwCaMgYD9HrjnC1a7B2eVt_N0kfTWmzqdzwpC7PODZ6E0rV4Xq7L-mMXPHdExGWNr21V4SfbNDbsgrdu91949rkxcXmMDpypoj35nUO0uL2Zj-_Iw-P0fnz1QHIueEuYo67gNBdJwl0uCy6dZKqwiiYUILMZsxxkwlWhTCreM84V5NaKJJfOABR8iC76u03wnxsbW73ym1B3LzXN0lSCzBTrqFFPFcHHGKzTTSjXJnxrCnqrT7_M9URToXf6NO0aZ31jFVsf_nCWSCGUEl1-3ufOeG0-Qhn1YsY6rVu1GaO8I0hP5KX3tf334w-azIH5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766808792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Dittmar, Peter J ; Ferrell, Jason A ; Fernandez, Jose V ; Smith, Hunter</creator><creatorcontrib>Dittmar, Peter J ; Ferrell, Jason A ; Fernandez, Jose V ; Smith, Hunter</creatorcontrib><description>As dicamba resistance traits become more common in agronomic crops, the potential for off-site movement also increases. Little is known of how common vegetable crops will respond to dicamba drift. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dicamba and glyphosate drift on bell pepper and squash growth as a function of application timing. The treatments were arranged in a factorial design with two timings by three rates and a nontreated check. The two timings were early bloom and midbloom (during bloom when fruit were present). The three rates were glyphosate at 21 + dicamba at 14 g ha−1, glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1, and glyphosate at 7 + dicamba 5 at g ha−1. Herbicides were applied with a controlled droplet applicator calibrated to deliver 2.34 L ha−1. In squash, crop injury was 26 to 31% at 3 DAT and 48 to 65% at 17 DAT. However, no differences were measured among application timings or rates for fruit weight or number at individual harvest or season total. Bell pepper injury ranged between 0 and 8% from 3 to 17 DAT and was not significantly different than the nontreated. However, large, Fancy, marketable, and total bell pepper fruit number were greater in the nontreated than glyphosate at 21 + dicamba 14 at g ha−1 and glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1 both years. The three rates of dicamba + glyphosate had a greater number and weight of cull fruit compared to the number of fruit in the nontreated plots. The cull fruit were shorter with a flattened appearance. Leaving bell pepper fruit on the plants longer may result in small and medium fruit becoming large or Fancy grade bell pepper fruit. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; dicamba; bell pepper, Capsicum anuum L.; squash, Cucumis melo L. Al volverse más común la resistencia a dicamba en cultivos agronómicos, el potencial de movimiento del herbicida a lugares no deseados se incrementa. Se conoce poco de cómo responderán los cultivos de vegetales a la deriva de dicamba. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la deriva de dicamba y glyphosate en el crecimiento del pimiento y la calabaza en función del momento de aplicación. Los tratamientos fueron arreglados en un diseño factorial con dos momentos de aplicación y tres dosis y un testigo sin tratamiento. Los dos momentos de aplicación fueron floración temprana y floración media (durante la floración cuando hubo presencia de frutos). Las tres dosis fueron glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1, glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1, y glyphosate a 7 + dicamba a 5 g ha−1. Los herbicidas fueron aplicados con una aplicador con gota controlada y calibrado para liberar 2.34 L ha−1. En la calabaza, el daño al cultivo fue 26 a 31% a 3 DAT y 48 a 65% a 17 DAT. Sin embargo, no se midieron diferencias entre momentos de aplicación o dosis para el peso o número de frutos para cosechas individuales o para el total de la temporada. El daño en el pimiento varió entre 0 y 8% entre 3 y 17 DAT, y no fue significativamente diferente del testigo sin tratamiento. Sin embargo, el número de frutos grandes, Fancy, comercializables, y totales fue mayor en el testigo que con glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1 y glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1 en ambos años. Las tres dosis de dicamba + glyphosate tuvieron un mayor número y peso de fruto de rechazo al compararse con el número de frutos en las parcelas testigo. La fruta de rechazo fue más corta con una apariencia aplanada. El dejar el fruto del pimiento en las plantas por más tiempo podría hacer que frutos pequeños y medianos alcancen un tamaño grande o una categoría Fancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-15-00085.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agronomic crops ; Auxins ; Controlled droplet application ; Cotton ; Crop harvesting ; Crops ; Fertilizer application timing ; Flowers & plants ; Fruits ; Harvest ; Herbicides ; Horticulture ; off-target movement ; Peppers ; Squashes ; synthetic auxin ; Vegetables ; WEED MANAGEMENT—OTHER CROPS/AREAS</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2016-03, Vol.30 (1), p.217-223</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jan-Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24855995$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24855995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dittmar, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrell, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Jose V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hunter</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>As dicamba resistance traits become more common in agronomic crops, the potential for off-site movement also increases. Little is known of how common vegetable crops will respond to dicamba drift. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dicamba and glyphosate drift on bell pepper and squash growth as a function of application timing. The treatments were arranged in a factorial design with two timings by three rates and a nontreated check. The two timings were early bloom and midbloom (during bloom when fruit were present). The three rates were glyphosate at 21 + dicamba at 14 g ha−1, glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1, and glyphosate at 7 + dicamba 5 at g ha−1. Herbicides were applied with a controlled droplet applicator calibrated to deliver 2.34 L ha−1. In squash, crop injury was 26 to 31% at 3 DAT and 48 to 65% at 17 DAT. However, no differences were measured among application timings or rates for fruit weight or number at individual harvest or season total. Bell pepper injury ranged between 0 and 8% from 3 to 17 DAT and was not significantly different than the nontreated. However, large, Fancy, marketable, and total bell pepper fruit number were greater in the nontreated than glyphosate at 21 + dicamba 14 at g ha−1 and glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1 both years. The three rates of dicamba + glyphosate had a greater number and weight of cull fruit compared to the number of fruit in the nontreated plots. The cull fruit were shorter with a flattened appearance. Leaving bell pepper fruit on the plants longer may result in small and medium fruit becoming large or Fancy grade bell pepper fruit. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; dicamba; bell pepper, Capsicum anuum L.; squash, Cucumis melo L. Al volverse más común la resistencia a dicamba en cultivos agronómicos, el potencial de movimiento del herbicida a lugares no deseados se incrementa. Se conoce poco de cómo responderán los cultivos de vegetales a la deriva de dicamba. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la deriva de dicamba y glyphosate en el crecimiento del pimiento y la calabaza en función del momento de aplicación. Los tratamientos fueron arreglados en un diseño factorial con dos momentos de aplicación y tres dosis y un testigo sin tratamiento. Los dos momentos de aplicación fueron floración temprana y floración media (durante la floración cuando hubo presencia de frutos). Las tres dosis fueron glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1, glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1, y glyphosate a 7 + dicamba a 5 g ha−1. Los herbicidas fueron aplicados con una aplicador con gota controlada y calibrado para liberar 2.34 L ha−1. En la calabaza, el daño al cultivo fue 26 a 31% a 3 DAT y 48 a 65% a 17 DAT. Sin embargo, no se midieron diferencias entre momentos de aplicación o dosis para el peso o número de frutos para cosechas individuales o para el total de la temporada. El daño en el pimiento varió entre 0 y 8% entre 3 y 17 DAT, y no fue significativamente diferente del testigo sin tratamiento. Sin embargo, el número de frutos grandes, Fancy, comercializables, y totales fue mayor en el testigo que con glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1 y glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1 en ambos años. Las tres dosis de dicamba + glyphosate tuvieron un mayor número y peso de fruto de rechazo al compararse con el número de frutos en las parcelas testigo. La fruta de rechazo fue más corta con una apariencia aplanada. El dejar el fruto del pimiento en las plantas por más tiempo podría hacer que frutos pequeños y medianos alcancen un tamaño grande o una categoría Fancy.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomic crops</subject><subject>Auxins</subject><subject>Controlled droplet application</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Fertilizer application timing</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>off-target movement</subject><subject>Peppers</subject><subject>Squashes</subject><subject>synthetic auxin</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT—OTHER CROPS/AREAS</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUh4MoOKdnT2LAc9xL0rTJUTedgqC4DfUU0pq4jq6pSYf439ut4tXT4_H7fu_Bh9AphUua0mT0MicTQgUBACku6R4aUCGAsCyBfTQAqYAAz14P0VGMKwCaMgYD9HrjnC1a7B2eVt_N0kfTWmzqdzwpC7PODZ6E0rV4Xq7L-mMXPHdExGWNr21V4SfbNDbsgrdu91949rkxcXmMDpypoj35nUO0uL2Zj-_Iw-P0fnz1QHIueEuYo67gNBdJwl0uCy6dZKqwiiYUILMZsxxkwlWhTCreM84V5NaKJJfOABR8iC76u03wnxsbW73ym1B3LzXN0lSCzBTrqFFPFcHHGKzTTSjXJnxrCnqrT7_M9URToXf6NO0aZ31jFVsf_nCWSCGUEl1-3ufOeG0-Qhn1YsY6rVu1GaO8I0hP5KX3tf334w-azIH5</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Dittmar, Peter J</creator><creator>Ferrell, Jason A</creator><creator>Fernandez, Jose V</creator><creator>Smith, Hunter</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash</title><author>Dittmar, Peter J ; Ferrell, Jason A ; Fernandez, Jose V ; Smith, Hunter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomic crops</topic><topic>Auxins</topic><topic>Controlled droplet application</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Fertilizer application timing</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>off-target movement</topic><topic>Peppers</topic><topic>Squashes</topic><topic>synthetic auxin</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT—OTHER CROPS/AREAS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dittmar, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrell, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Jose V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Hunter</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dittmar, Peter J</au><au>Ferrell, Jason A</au><au>Fernandez, Jose V</au><au>Smith, Hunter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>217-223</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>As dicamba resistance traits become more common in agronomic crops, the potential for off-site movement also increases. Little is known of how common vegetable crops will respond to dicamba drift. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dicamba and glyphosate drift on bell pepper and squash growth as a function of application timing. The treatments were arranged in a factorial design with two timings by three rates and a nontreated check. The two timings were early bloom and midbloom (during bloom when fruit were present). The three rates were glyphosate at 21 + dicamba at 14 g ha−1, glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1, and glyphosate at 7 + dicamba 5 at g ha−1. Herbicides were applied with a controlled droplet applicator calibrated to deliver 2.34 L ha−1. In squash, crop injury was 26 to 31% at 3 DAT and 48 to 65% at 17 DAT. However, no differences were measured among application timings or rates for fruit weight or number at individual harvest or season total. Bell pepper injury ranged between 0 and 8% from 3 to 17 DAT and was not significantly different than the nontreated. However, large, Fancy, marketable, and total bell pepper fruit number were greater in the nontreated than glyphosate at 21 + dicamba 14 at g ha−1 and glyphosate at 10 + dicamba at 7 g ha−1 both years. The three rates of dicamba + glyphosate had a greater number and weight of cull fruit compared to the number of fruit in the nontreated plots. The cull fruit were shorter with a flattened appearance. Leaving bell pepper fruit on the plants longer may result in small and medium fruit becoming large or Fancy grade bell pepper fruit. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; dicamba; bell pepper, Capsicum anuum L.; squash, Cucumis melo L. Al volverse más común la resistencia a dicamba en cultivos agronómicos, el potencial de movimiento del herbicida a lugares no deseados se incrementa. Se conoce poco de cómo responderán los cultivos de vegetales a la deriva de dicamba. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la deriva de dicamba y glyphosate en el crecimiento del pimiento y la calabaza en función del momento de aplicación. Los tratamientos fueron arreglados en un diseño factorial con dos momentos de aplicación y tres dosis y un testigo sin tratamiento. Los dos momentos de aplicación fueron floración temprana y floración media (durante la floración cuando hubo presencia de frutos). Las tres dosis fueron glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1, glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1, y glyphosate a 7 + dicamba a 5 g ha−1. Los herbicidas fueron aplicados con una aplicador con gota controlada y calibrado para liberar 2.34 L ha−1. En la calabaza, el daño al cultivo fue 26 a 31% a 3 DAT y 48 a 65% a 17 DAT. Sin embargo, no se midieron diferencias entre momentos de aplicación o dosis para el peso o número de frutos para cosechas individuales o para el total de la temporada. El daño en el pimiento varió entre 0 y 8% entre 3 y 17 DAT, y no fue significativamente diferente del testigo sin tratamiento. Sin embargo, el número de frutos grandes, Fancy, comercializables, y totales fue mayor en el testigo que con glyphosate a 21 + dicamba a 14 g ha−1 y glyphosate a 10 + dicamba a 7 g ha−1 en ambos años. Las tres dosis de dicamba + glyphosate tuvieron un mayor número y peso de fruto de rechazo al compararse con el número de frutos en las parcelas testigo. La fruta de rechazo fue más corta con una apariencia aplanada. El dejar el fruto del pimiento en las plantas por más tiempo podría hacer que frutos pequeños y medianos alcancen un tamaño grande o una categoría Fancy.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-15-00085.1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2016-03, Vol.30 (1), p.217-223 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1766808792 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Agronomic crops Auxins Controlled droplet application Cotton Crop harvesting Crops Fertilizer application timing Flowers & plants Fruits Harvest Herbicides Horticulture off-target movement Peppers Squashes synthetic auxin Vegetables WEED MANAGEMENT—OTHER CROPS/AREAS |
title | Effect of Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Timing and Rates in Bell Pepper and Yellow Squash |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Glyphosate%20and%20Dicamba%20Drift%20Timing%20and%20Rates%20in%20Bell%20Pepper%20and%20Yellow%20Squash&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Dittmar,%20Peter%20J&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=217-223&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-15-00085.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24855995%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-2f1fc31b5443fb8c38f829ce9141007e72e308439c9a65d73390bee54b8fa00c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766808792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24855995&rfr_iscdi=true |