Loading…
Body composition assessment and nutritional status evaluation in men and women Portuguese centenarians
OBJECTIVES: To assess body composition, nutritional status and its differences between genders in a sample of Portuguese centenarians. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Centenarians recruited in Portugal, able to give informed consent. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 252 subjects, with...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of nutrition, health & aging health & aging, 2016-03, Vol.20 (3), p.256-266 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVES: To assess body composition, nutritional status and its differences between genders in a sample of Portuguese centenarians. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Centenarians recruited in Portugal, able to give informed consent. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 252 subjects, with a median age of 100 years, mostly women (77.8%) who accepted to participate in the study, during the period of 2012 to 2014. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric data collected (weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, hip and waist/hip ratio) were evaluated according to WHO criteria. A portable tetrapolar bioimpedance analyzer was used to calculate body composition and to assess resting metabolism. Nutritional status was evaluated according to three different criteria: BMI, waist circumference and body fat percentage using anthropometric equations and bioimpedance. RESULTS: We observed an overall mean weight of 51.02±11.03Kg, height of 1.55±0.07m and a BMI of 21.07±3.69Kg/m². For most of the evaluated parameters, we found substantial differences between genders. The prevalence of underweight and overweight were 25.3% and 13.3%, respectively. Only 5 subjects were obese. Overweight subjects were mostly men (W=10.6% vs. M=22.6%), whereas women were more underweight (W=28.7% vs. M=13.2%). When considering the waist circumference, 26.5% were above the cut-off value. Most of centenarians (72.9%) had a healthy level of visceral fat. This measurement was highly correlated with waist circumference (r= 0.687, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1279-7707 1760-4788 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12603-015-0566-0 |