Effect of Credit Constraint on Profit of Small Scale Rice-Based Farmers in Niger State, Northwestern Nigeria

Credit constraint occurs when a farmer cannot increase expenditure on inputs in order to maximize profit due to lack of farm credit or high cost of credit. Farming households are confronted with credit constraint that result in low crop output and profit. Using a non-parametric measure of efficiency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic & management perspectives 2014-06, Vol.8 (2), p.58
Main Authors: Olusola, Odu O, Okoruwa, V O
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access to information
Agricultural lending
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Cost control
Data envelopment analysis
Economic models
Efficiency
Expenditures
Farmers
Farms
Fertilizers
Herbicides
Informal economy
Irrigation
Profit maximization
Profitability
Profits
Rice
Seasons
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Credit constraint occurs when a farmer cannot increase expenditure on inputs in order to maximize profit due to lack of farm credit or high cost of credit. Farming households are confronted with credit constraint that result in low crop output and profit. Using a non-parametric measure of efficiency, the Data Envelopment Analysis Programme (DEAP) and a credit-constrained profit function, this study analyses the presence and effect of credit constraint on the profit maximization objective of rice farmers in a 2009 survey conducted in Niger State, Northwestern Nigeria. The differences between profit functions with and without a credit constraint gave a measure of the effect of credit constraint on profit. Results showed that most rice farmers (67.5%) were credit constrained. Credit-unconstrained rice farmers (CUF) that used formal credit spent "23,583.87±8662.18/ha and "11,806.45±6927.71/ha respectively on fertilizer and herbicides as compared to "16,675.00±9627.48/ha and "7,591.18±7503.02/ha respectively by informal credit recipients. On the other hand, credit constrained farmers (CCF) spent "11,949.78±8488.26/ha and "5550.00±5145.61/ha on fertilizer and herbicides. CCF were less efficient and less profitable. CUF, contrariwise, were able to spend more on improved farm inputs, more efficient and more profitable. It is recommended that suitable credit support and educational programmes for rice farmers should be established to encourage expenditure and efficient use of improved inputs, enhance rice production and increase profitability.
ISSN:2523-5338
2523-5338