Loading…

SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work

IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458
Main Authors: da Silva Junior, S H A, Vasconcelos, A G G, Griep, R H, Rotenberg, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473
cites
container_end_page A458
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A457
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 65
creator da Silva Junior, S H A
Vasconcelos, A G G
Griep, R H
Rotenberg, L
description IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779275948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4013850291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwBgyRGJjS2seJHY-o4iZVXARUMFl24qhO06TYqWg3Fl6UJyFtCjPTuej7z-VH6JTgASGUDQuTTgeACRmQCARni0ECe6hHIo5D4DTZRz1MIhpiHL8eoiPvC9ymHEQPvT09sJCQ78-viSptZpt1oKoscKa0SttyU9d50ExN8FG7WfDbs1VmVsH70vjG1lWlrDNtL6iWzptzv2WP0UGuSm9OdrGPXq4un0c34fj--nZ0MQ41RAmE1KQ816y9WpvciAgUpalKWZYpEWsAoXCutIBM5VgkOWVYMwUatw9lDCJO--ism7tw9fYgWdRLV7UrJeFcAI9FlLRU1FGpq713JpcLZ-fKrSXBcmOi3JgoNybKnYkygVYWdjLrG7P60yg3k4xTHsu7yUg-xTAGBkQ-tvyw4_W8-N-GH4CQhO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779275948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</creator><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Factor analysis ; Medical personnel ; Occupational health</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A457.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A457.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,314,780,784,3194,27924,27925,77594,77595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, A G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griep, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</description><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwBgyRGJjS2seJHY-o4iZVXARUMFl24qhO06TYqWg3Fl6UJyFtCjPTuej7z-VH6JTgASGUDQuTTgeACRmQCARni0ECe6hHIo5D4DTZRz1MIhpiHL8eoiPvC9ymHEQPvT09sJCQ78-viSptZpt1oKoscKa0SttyU9d50ExN8FG7WfDbs1VmVsH70vjG1lWlrDNtL6iWzptzv2WP0UGuSm9OdrGPXq4un0c34fj--nZ0MQ41RAmE1KQ816y9WpvciAgUpalKWZYpEWsAoXCutIBM5VgkOWVYMwUatw9lDCJO--ism7tw9fYgWdRLV7UrJeFcAI9FlLRU1FGpq713JpcLZ-fKrSXBcmOi3JgoNybKnYkygVYWdjLrG7P60yg3k4xTHsu7yUg-xTAGBkQ-tvyw4_W8-N-GH4CQhO8</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>da Silva Junior, S H A</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, A G G</creator><creator>Griep, R H</creator><creator>Rotenberg, L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><author>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, A G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griep, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva Junior, S H A</au><au>Vasconcelos, A G G</au><au>Griep, R H</au><au>Rotenberg, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A457</spage><epage>A458</epage><pages>A457-A458</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458
issn 0143-005X
1470-2738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1779275948
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals
subjects Factor analysis
Medical personnel
Occupational health
title SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SP6-11%E2%80%85Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20work%20ability%20index%20questionnaire%20in%20nurse's%20work&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=da%20Silva%20Junior,%20S%20H%20A&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A457&rft.epage=A458&rft.pages=A457-A458&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4013850291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779275948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true