Loading…
SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work
IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabil...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A458 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A457 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | da Silva Junior, S H A Vasconcelos, A G G Griep, R H Rotenberg, L |
description | IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779275948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4013850291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwBgyRGJjS2seJHY-o4iZVXARUMFl24qhO06TYqWg3Fl6UJyFtCjPTuej7z-VH6JTgASGUDQuTTgeACRmQCARni0ECe6hHIo5D4DTZRz1MIhpiHL8eoiPvC9ymHEQPvT09sJCQ78-viSptZpt1oKoscKa0SttyU9d50ExN8FG7WfDbs1VmVsH70vjG1lWlrDNtL6iWzptzv2WP0UGuSm9OdrGPXq4un0c34fj--nZ0MQ41RAmE1KQ816y9WpvciAgUpalKWZYpEWsAoXCutIBM5VgkOWVYMwUatw9lDCJO--ism7tw9fYgWdRLV7UrJeFcAI9FlLRU1FGpq713JpcLZ-fKrSXBcmOi3JgoNybKnYkygVYWdjLrG7P60yg3k4xTHsu7yUg-xTAGBkQ-tvyw4_W8-N-GH4CQhO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779275948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</creator><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Factor analysis ; Medical personnel ; Occupational health</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A457.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A457.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,314,780,784,3194,27924,27925,77594,77595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, A G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griep, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</description><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwBgyRGJjS2seJHY-o4iZVXARUMFl24qhO06TYqWg3Fl6UJyFtCjPTuej7z-VH6JTgASGUDQuTTgeACRmQCARni0ECe6hHIo5D4DTZRz1MIhpiHL8eoiPvC9ymHEQPvT09sJCQ78-viSptZpt1oKoscKa0SttyU9d50ExN8FG7WfDbs1VmVsH70vjG1lWlrDNtL6iWzptzv2WP0UGuSm9OdrGPXq4un0c34fj--nZ0MQ41RAmE1KQ816y9WpvciAgUpalKWZYpEWsAoXCutIBM5VgkOWVYMwUatw9lDCJO--ism7tw9fYgWdRLV7UrJeFcAI9FlLRU1FGpq713JpcLZ-fKrSXBcmOi3JgoNybKnYkygVYWdjLrG7P60yg3k4xTHsu7yUg-xTAGBkQ-tvyw4_W8-N-GH4CQhO8</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>da Silva Junior, S H A</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, A G G</creator><creator>Griep, R H</creator><creator>Rotenberg, L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</title><author>da Silva Junior, S H A ; Vasconcelos, A G G ; Griep, R H ; Rotenberg, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, S H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, A G G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griep, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotenberg, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva Junior, S H A</au><au>Vasconcelos, A G G</au><au>Griep, R H</au><au>Rotenberg, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A457</spage><epage>A458</epage><pages>A457-A458</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>IntroductionThe Work Ability Index questionnaire (WAI) assesses the perception of the worker in relation “how well a worker is or will be in the present or near future and how capable this worker is of performing work given the demands of the job and the health status and mental and physical capabilities of the worker.” Aims: to investigate the validity and reliability of the WAI in 1436 nurses' work of tree public hospital of the Rio de Janeiro.MethodsWe evaluated the validity dimensional through exploratory factor analysis using polychoric correlation matrix and parallel analysis for retention of factors and correlational validity correlating the WAI with theoretically relevant constructs using Spearman correlation. The reliability was assessed by the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. The factorability of data was tested by the Meyer-Olkin index (KMO) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. The R software was used for analysis.ResultsThe factorial analyses indicated a two-dimensional structure (perception of work ability/mental resources and diseases and health restrictions). The value of Cronbach's α and McDonald ω was, respectively, 0.80 and 0.87. The theoretical hypothesis of the construct validity were confirmed with direct correlation and significant of the WAI with the scores of reward, control and self-evaluate of the health status; inverse correlation and significant with the scale of need for recovery, psychological distress, effort, over-commitment and demand.ConclusionWe found good evidence for a high reliability and construct validity of WAI questionnaire, supporting its use in future analyses in similar populations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A457-A458 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1779275948 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Factor analysis Medical personnel Occupational health |
title | SP6-11 Validity and reliability of the work ability index questionnaire in nurse's work |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SP6-11%E2%80%85Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20work%20ability%20index%20questionnaire%20in%20nurse's%20work&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=da%20Silva%20Junior,%20S%20H%20A&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A457&rft.epage=A458&rft.pages=A457-A458&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.2011.142976p.82&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4013850291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2482-3ec7fb6976befe942a33cac6dda95b229a0fab92daf098f360b6a2b0014d62473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779275948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |