Loading…
P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty
IntroductionThe evaluation of frailty requires some measurable components. In our environment, it is known that the use of these measures on a large scale will not easily operationalise. Given this, we study the possibility of identifying the syndrome of frailty through subjective questions.Objectiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A348-A348 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A348 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A348 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Nunes, D P da Silva Alexandre, T Corona, L P Santos, J L Duarte, Y A O Lebrao, M L |
description | IntroductionThe evaluation of frailty requires some measurable components. In our environment, it is known that the use of these measures on a large scale will not easily operationalise. Given this, we study the possibility of identifying the syndrome of frailty through subjective questions.ObjectiveTo validate the subjective components for evaluation of frailty.MethodThis study is part of the SABE Study - Health, Well-being and Ageing, held in São Paulo, Brazil. This analysis used 433 elderly (age ≥75 years) in 2009. We adopted the phenotype of frailty proposed by Fried et al, as a gold standard (objective evaluation of unintentional weight loss, fatigue reported, reduced grip strength, reduced walking speed and low physical activity). In this model, elderly with three or more components are considered frail; those with one or two are pre-frail. Subjective evaluation was performed using dichotomous questions for each component. We calculated the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.ResultsThe subjective evaluation of an instrument is valid and reliable. The sensitivity was 89.7% among pre-frail and 63.2% among the frail. By analysing frailty process (pre-frail+frail) the sensitivity was 90%, positive predictive value was 85.2% and negative predictive value was 32.7%.ConclusionThe subjective evaluation of frailty is a good tool to identify frailty process in elderly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech.2011.142976l.88 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779276233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4013852911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1978-16ca963990f258f5132f42facb685edd7bb139e9d8bbea51b2a2cfd780e60cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwBgyRmNP62ol_RlTxJyroUBDqYtmJrSakuNgpohsLL8qTkCoVM9O9w3fOkT6EzgGPACgb17ZYjggGGEFGJGfNSIgDNICM45RwKg7RAENGU4zzl2N0EmONu5cTOUBkRtKM4Z-v71nwax9tmaxsu_Rl4nxI7IduNrqt_FviXeKCrpp2e4qOnG6iPdvfIXq6vppPbtPp483d5HKaGpBcpMAKLRmVEjuSC5cDJS4jTheGidyWJTcGqLSyFMZYnYMhmhSu5AJbhguT0SG66HvXwb9vbGxV7TfhrZtUwLkknBFKOyrrqSL4GIN1ah2qlQ5bBVjt7KidHbWzo_Z2lBBdLO1jVWzt519Gh1fFOOW5enieqBkT08Vica_mHT_uebOq_7fwC2Uyds8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779276233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Nunes, D P ; da Silva Alexandre, T ; Corona, L P ; Santos, J L ; Duarte, Y A O ; Lebrao, M L</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunes, D P ; da Silva Alexandre, T ; Corona, L P ; Santos, J L ; Duarte, Y A O ; Lebrao, M L</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe evaluation of frailty requires some measurable components. In our environment, it is known that the use of these measures on a large scale will not easily operationalise. Given this, we study the possibility of identifying the syndrome of frailty through subjective questions.ObjectiveTo validate the subjective components for evaluation of frailty.MethodThis study is part of the SABE Study - Health, Well-being and Ageing, held in São Paulo, Brazil. This analysis used 433 elderly (age ≥75 years) in 2009. We adopted the phenotype of frailty proposed by Fried et al, as a gold standard (objective evaluation of unintentional weight loss, fatigue reported, reduced grip strength, reduced walking speed and low physical activity). In this model, elderly with three or more components are considered frail; those with one or two are pre-frail. Subjective evaluation was performed using dichotomous questions for each component. We calculated the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.ResultsThe subjective evaluation of an instrument is valid and reliable. The sensitivity was 89.7% among pre-frail and 63.2% among the frail. By analysing frailty process (pre-frail+frail) the sensitivity was 90%, positive predictive value was 85.2% and negative predictive value was 32.7%.ConclusionThe subjective evaluation of frailty is a good tool to identify frailty process in elderly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.2011.142976l.88</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A348-A348</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A348.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A348.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,314,780,784,3194,27924,27925,77594,77595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunes, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Alexandre, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corona, L P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Y A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebrao, M L</creatorcontrib><title>P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>IntroductionThe evaluation of frailty requires some measurable components. In our environment, it is known that the use of these measures on a large scale will not easily operationalise. Given this, we study the possibility of identifying the syndrome of frailty through subjective questions.ObjectiveTo validate the subjective components for evaluation of frailty.MethodThis study is part of the SABE Study - Health, Well-being and Ageing, held in São Paulo, Brazil. This analysis used 433 elderly (age ≥75 years) in 2009. We adopted the phenotype of frailty proposed by Fried et al, as a gold standard (objective evaluation of unintentional weight loss, fatigue reported, reduced grip strength, reduced walking speed and low physical activity). In this model, elderly with three or more components are considered frail; those with one or two are pre-frail. Subjective evaluation was performed using dichotomous questions for each component. We calculated the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.ResultsThe subjective evaluation of an instrument is valid and reliable. The sensitivity was 89.7% among pre-frail and 63.2% among the frail. By analysing frailty process (pre-frail+frail) the sensitivity was 90%, positive predictive value was 85.2% and negative predictive value was 32.7%.ConclusionThe subjective evaluation of frailty is a good tool to identify frailty process in elderly.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwBgyRmNP62ol_RlTxJyroUBDqYtmJrSakuNgpohsLL8qTkCoVM9O9w3fOkT6EzgGPACgb17ZYjggGGEFGJGfNSIgDNICM45RwKg7RAENGU4zzl2N0EmONu5cTOUBkRtKM4Z-v71nwax9tmaxsu_Rl4nxI7IduNrqt_FviXeKCrpp2e4qOnG6iPdvfIXq6vppPbtPp483d5HKaGpBcpMAKLRmVEjuSC5cDJS4jTheGidyWJTcGqLSyFMZYnYMhmhSu5AJbhguT0SG66HvXwb9vbGxV7TfhrZtUwLkknBFKOyrrqSL4GIN1ah2qlQ5bBVjt7KidHbWzo_Z2lBBdLO1jVWzt519Gh1fFOOW5enieqBkT08Vica_mHT_uebOq_7fwC2Uyds8</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Nunes, D P</creator><creator>da Silva Alexandre, T</creator><creator>Corona, L P</creator><creator>Santos, J L</creator><creator>Duarte, Y A O</creator><creator>Lebrao, M L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty</title><author>Nunes, D P ; da Silva Alexandre, T ; Corona, L P ; Santos, J L ; Duarte, Y A O ; Lebrao, M L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1978-16ca963990f258f5132f42facb685edd7bb139e9d8bbea51b2a2cfd780e60cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunes, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Alexandre, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corona, L P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Y A O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebrao, M L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunes, D P</au><au>da Silva Alexandre, T</au><au>Corona, L P</au><au>Santos, J L</au><au>Duarte, Y A O</au><au>Lebrao, M L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A348</spage><epage>A348</epage><pages>A348-A348</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>IntroductionThe evaluation of frailty requires some measurable components. In our environment, it is known that the use of these measures on a large scale will not easily operationalise. Given this, we study the possibility of identifying the syndrome of frailty through subjective questions.ObjectiveTo validate the subjective components for evaluation of frailty.MethodThis study is part of the SABE Study - Health, Well-being and Ageing, held in São Paulo, Brazil. This analysis used 433 elderly (age ≥75 years) in 2009. We adopted the phenotype of frailty proposed by Fried et al, as a gold standard (objective evaluation of unintentional weight loss, fatigue reported, reduced grip strength, reduced walking speed and low physical activity). In this model, elderly with three or more components are considered frail; those with one or two are pre-frail. Subjective evaluation was performed using dichotomous questions for each component. We calculated the reliability, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.ResultsThe subjective evaluation of an instrument is valid and reliable. The sensitivity was 89.7% among pre-frail and 63.2% among the frail. By analysing frailty process (pre-frail+frail) the sensitivity was 90%, positive predictive value was 85.2% and negative predictive value was 32.7%.ConclusionThe subjective evaluation of frailty is a good tool to identify frailty process in elderly.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/jech.2011.142976l.88</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A348-A348 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1779276233 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Evaluation |
title | P2-460 Proposed method for evaluation of frailty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A11%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P2-460%E2%80%85Proposed%20method%20for%20evaluation%20of%20frailty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Nunes,%20D%20P&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A348&rft.epage=A348&rft.pages=A348-A348&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.2011.142976l.88&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4013852911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1978-16ca963990f258f5132f42facb685edd7bb139e9d8bbea51b2a2cfd780e60cb43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779276233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |