Loading…
Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA
In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. Thi...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of human resource management 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13 |
container_end_page | 1216 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1192 |
container_title | International journal of human resource management |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Stock, Ruth M. Strecker, M. Melanie Bieling, Gisela I. |
description | In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1785758902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4041466661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwE5AicaXDSdY2PcE08SUhcYCdIy9NWUablKQFjV9Px8YVXyzZjy29DyHnDCYMJFxBkcqUFXzCgaXDKOMgigMyYtMsS6aiKA7JaMskW-iYnMS4BmAilXJE_HN4Q2e_sbPeYU2_fHhPKmxsvaGxb1sfOoqR9s5-mhAHIJjGlJtrOqM6-BgT3dddH4aF9k2LwUbvqK_ofGUdXtJHV1qk6ErarQxdvMxOyVGFdTRn-z4mi7vb1_lD8vR8_zifPSVaCNklOWOgpeGgdbkEqPIql1Nt-DIHlNlQQudMlEuWiWwKAhmIki_LXPKi4IBMjMnF7m8b_EdvYqfWvg9DwqhYLtM8lQXwgUp31G-WYCrVBttg2CgGautW_blVW7dq73a4u9ndWVf50OBgrS5Vh5vahyqg0zYq8f-LHxEhgBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785758902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><description>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-5192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>collectivism ; Corporate culture ; Cross cultural studies ; cross-cultural ; Culture ; Employees ; individualism ; Job satisfaction ; organizational work-family support ; Work life balance ; work-family culture ; work-family programs</subject><ispartof>International journal of human resource management, 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, M. Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><title>International journal of human resource management</title><description>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</description><subject>collectivism</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>cross-cultural</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>individualism</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>organizational work-family support</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><subject>work-family culture</subject><subject>work-family programs</subject><issn>0958-5192</issn><issn>1466-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwE5AicaXDSdY2PcE08SUhcYCdIy9NWUablKQFjV9Px8YVXyzZjy29DyHnDCYMJFxBkcqUFXzCgaXDKOMgigMyYtMsS6aiKA7JaMskW-iYnMS4BmAilXJE_HN4Q2e_sbPeYU2_fHhPKmxsvaGxb1sfOoqR9s5-mhAHIJjGlJtrOqM6-BgT3dddH4aF9k2LwUbvqK_ofGUdXtJHV1qk6ErarQxdvMxOyVGFdTRn-z4mi7vb1_lD8vR8_zifPSVaCNklOWOgpeGgdbkEqPIql1Nt-DIHlNlQQudMlEuWiWwKAhmIki_LXPKi4IBMjMnF7m8b_EdvYqfWvg9DwqhYLtM8lQXwgUp31G-WYCrVBttg2CgGautW_blVW7dq73a4u9ndWVf50OBgrS5Vh5vahyqg0zYq8f-LHxEhgBQ</recordid><startdate>20160616</startdate><enddate>20160616</enddate><creator>Stock, Ruth M.</creator><creator>Strecker, M. Melanie</creator><creator>Bieling, Gisela I.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160616</creationdate><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><author>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>collectivism</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>cross-cultural</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>individualism</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>organizational work-family support</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><topic>work-family culture</topic><topic>work-family programs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, M. Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stock, Ruth M.</au><au>Strecker, M. Melanie</au><au>Bieling, Gisela I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle><date>2016-06-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1192</spage><epage>1216</epage><pages>1192-1216</pages><issn>0958-5192</issn><eissn>1466-4399</eissn><abstract>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-5192 |
ispartof | International journal of human resource management, 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216 |
issn | 0958-5192 1466-4399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1785758902 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | collectivism Corporate culture Cross cultural studies cross-cultural Culture Employees individualism Job satisfaction organizational work-family support Work life balance work-family culture work-family programs |
title | Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20work-family%20support%20as%20universal%20remedy?%20A%20cross-cultural%20comparison%20of%20China,%20India%20and%20the%20USA&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20resource%20management&rft.au=Stock,%20Ruth%20M.&rft.date=2016-06-16&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1192&rft.epage=1216&rft.pages=1192-1216&rft.issn=0958-5192&rft.eissn=1466-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E4041466661%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785758902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |