Loading…

Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA

In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of human resource management 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216
Main Authors: Stock, Ruth M., Strecker, M. Melanie, Bieling, Gisela I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13
container_end_page 1216
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1192
container_title International journal of human resource management
container_volume 27
creator Stock, Ruth M.
Strecker, M. Melanie
Bieling, Gisela I.
description In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1785758902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4041466661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwE5AicaXDSdY2PcE08SUhcYCdIy9NWUablKQFjV9Px8YVXyzZjy29DyHnDCYMJFxBkcqUFXzCgaXDKOMgigMyYtMsS6aiKA7JaMskW-iYnMS4BmAilXJE_HN4Q2e_sbPeYU2_fHhPKmxsvaGxb1sfOoqR9s5-mhAHIJjGlJtrOqM6-BgT3dddH4aF9k2LwUbvqK_ofGUdXtJHV1qk6ErarQxdvMxOyVGFdTRn-z4mi7vb1_lD8vR8_zifPSVaCNklOWOgpeGgdbkEqPIql1Nt-DIHlNlQQudMlEuWiWwKAhmIki_LXPKi4IBMjMnF7m8b_EdvYqfWvg9DwqhYLtM8lQXwgUp31G-WYCrVBttg2CgGautW_blVW7dq73a4u9ndWVf50OBgrS5Vh5vahyqg0zYq8f-LHxEhgBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785758902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><description>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-5192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>collectivism ; Corporate culture ; Cross cultural studies ; cross-cultural ; Culture ; Employees ; individualism ; Job satisfaction ; organizational work-family support ; Work life balance ; work-family culture ; work-family programs</subject><ispartof>International journal of human resource management, 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, M. Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><title>International journal of human resource management</title><description>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</description><subject>collectivism</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>cross-cultural</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>individualism</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>organizational work-family support</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><subject>work-family culture</subject><subject>work-family programs</subject><issn>0958-5192</issn><issn>1466-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwE5AicaXDSdY2PcE08SUhcYCdIy9NWUablKQFjV9Px8YVXyzZjy29DyHnDCYMJFxBkcqUFXzCgaXDKOMgigMyYtMsS6aiKA7JaMskW-iYnMS4BmAilXJE_HN4Q2e_sbPeYU2_fHhPKmxsvaGxb1sfOoqR9s5-mhAHIJjGlJtrOqM6-BgT3dddH4aF9k2LwUbvqK_ofGUdXtJHV1qk6ErarQxdvMxOyVGFdTRn-z4mi7vb1_lD8vR8_zifPSVaCNklOWOgpeGgdbkEqPIql1Nt-DIHlNlQQudMlEuWiWwKAhmIki_LXPKi4IBMjMnF7m8b_EdvYqfWvg9DwqhYLtM8lQXwgUp31G-WYCrVBttg2CgGautW_blVW7dq73a4u9ndWVf50OBgrS5Vh5vahyqg0zYq8f-LHxEhgBQ</recordid><startdate>20160616</startdate><enddate>20160616</enddate><creator>Stock, Ruth M.</creator><creator>Strecker, M. Melanie</creator><creator>Bieling, Gisela I.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160616</creationdate><title>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</title><author>Stock, Ruth M. ; Strecker, M. Melanie ; Bieling, Gisela I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>collectivism</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>cross-cultural</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>individualism</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>organizational work-family support</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><topic>work-family culture</topic><topic>work-family programs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ruth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, M. Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieling, Gisela I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stock, Ruth M.</au><au>Strecker, M. Melanie</au><au>Bieling, Gisela I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle><date>2016-06-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1192</spage><epage>1216</epage><pages>1192-1216</pages><issn>0958-5192</issn><eissn>1466-4399</eissn><abstract>In both industrialized and emerging countries, organizations increasingly seek to support employees' efforts to maintain a healthy work-family balance. Research has identified two types of organizational support in this context: formal work-family programs and informal work-family cultures. This study examines the relative effects of work-family programs versus work-family culture on employees' job satisfaction and performance in various cultural environments. Drawing on the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension introduced by Hofstede, it is argued that employees' cultural background may affect family models, which in turn determine employees' need for formal organizational work-family support, but are not related to employees' need for informal support. In line with this notion, the results from comparisons of an industrialized country (the USA) with two emerging countries (China and India) show that work-family culture has positive effects in all three contexts. However, formal work-family programs positively affect job satisfaction and job performance only in India and the USA, whereas they exhibit no significant effect in the more collectivist setting of China.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-5192
ispartof International journal of human resource management, 2016-06, Vol.27 (11), p.1192-1216
issn 0958-5192
1466-4399
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1785758902
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects collectivism
Corporate culture
Cross cultural studies
cross-cultural
Culture
Employees
individualism
Job satisfaction
organizational work-family support
Work life balance
work-family culture
work-family programs
title Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20work-family%20support%20as%20universal%20remedy?%20A%20cross-cultural%20comparison%20of%20China,%20India%20and%20the%20USA&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20resource%20management&rft.au=Stock,%20Ruth%20M.&rft.date=2016-06-16&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1192&rft.epage=1216&rft.pages=1192-1216&rft.issn=0958-5192&rft.eissn=1466-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09585192.2015.1062039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E4041466661%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7110c8e20ccdb00f7f784ce2b70a866663c713db1636403a103d2bd7829920a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785758902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true