Loading…

Comparative flower development of Juglans regia, Cyclocarya paliurus and Engelhardia spicata: homology of floral envelopes in Juglandaceae

Homology among reproductive structures is pivotal for understanding angiosperm evolution. In Juglandaceae, homologies of floral parts have been disputed due to morphological variability in flowers. Previous interpretations were based mainly on mature flowers and lacked developmental studies. We inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Botanical journal of the Linnean Society 2016-06, Vol.181 (2), p.279-293
Main Authors: Lin, Ruo‐Zhu, Li, Rui‐Qi, Lu, An‐Ming, Zhu, Jun‐Yi, Chen, Zhi‐Duan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Homology among reproductive structures is pivotal for understanding angiosperm evolution. In Juglandaceae, homologies of floral parts have been disputed due to morphological variability in flowers. Previous interpretations were based mainly on mature flowers and lacked developmental studies. We investigated the unisexual flower development of Juglans regia, Cyclocarya paliurus and Engelhardia spicata using scanning electron microscopy. The ‘floral envelope’ of staminate flowers in J. regia and C. paliurus consists of a bract and several tepals. Six tepals are initiated in a whorled pattern in J. regia, whereas four to six tepals are arranged in a variable pattern in C. paliurus. The three‐lobed bract of E. spicata results from the cleavage of an entire bract, rather than adnation of the bract and its bracteoles. Pistillate flowers of J. regia and C. paliurus, subtended by a bract and a horseshoe‐shaped bracteole, usually have four tepals initiating simultaneously in one whorl. The organogenesis patterns of the ‘floral envelope’ and stamens in staminate flowers show greater diversity, indicating different degrees of reduction among genera. Our floral developmental data support the division of Juglandaceae into two subfamilies and then further into three tribes.
ISSN:0024-4074
1095-8339
DOI:10.1111/boj.12413