Loading…

Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model

We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of adver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information economics and policy 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44
Main Authors: Chen, Minghua, Rennhoff, Adam D., Serfes, Konstantinos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3
container_end_page 44
container_issue
container_start_page 30
container_title Information economics and policy
container_volume 35
creator Chen, Minghua
Rennhoff, Adam D.
Serfes, Konstantinos
description We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1790498376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167624516300142</els_id><sourcerecordid>4064694111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMc_WOJKgh0nTnykFU9V4gJny1mvK0dpXJy0iL_hX_gxXBWJI6ddzc7MaoYQylnOGZc3Xe4HFxDCJvR5kZCciZwxfkRmvKlFVqm6OiazdKgzWZTVKTkbx44xlnY2I8_z7WB7P6yu6fcX7Q0FEyekm-ghgdQMlu4wTh5MT1sTV8YPe9wP1NDpI2Sjt2jpOljsL8iJM_2Il7_znLzd370uHrPly8PT4naZQcmLKeMcpeCtE4WoayEACgQLKGsoBLTcocSiQNcKrpQSjVSNbCpbuhacEkqBOCdXB99NDO9bHCfdhW0c0kvNa8VK1YhaJlZzYEEM4xjR6ZRpbeKn5kzvm9Od_mtO75vTTOjUXJLOD1JMKXYeox7B4wBofUSYtA3-f5MfQ_58Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790498376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><description>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Bundling ; Economic models ; Incentives ; Market structure ; Media rights ; Monopolies ; Negotiation ; Networks ; Political platform ; Prices ; Profits ; Regulation ; Service introduction ; Studies ; Television ; Television networks ; Two-sided market ; Vertical relations ; À la carte regulation</subject><ispartof>Information economics and policy, 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222,34134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><title>Information economics and policy</title><description>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Bundling</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Market structure</subject><subject>Media rights</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Political platform</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Service introduction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Television networks</subject><subject>Two-sided market</subject><subject>Vertical relations</subject><subject>À la carte regulation</subject><issn>0167-6245</issn><issn>1873-5975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMc_WOJKgh0nTnykFU9V4gJny1mvK0dpXJy0iL_hX_gxXBWJI6ddzc7MaoYQylnOGZc3Xe4HFxDCJvR5kZCciZwxfkRmvKlFVqm6OiazdKgzWZTVKTkbx44xlnY2I8_z7WB7P6yu6fcX7Q0FEyekm-ghgdQMlu4wTh5MT1sTV8YPe9wP1NDpI2Sjt2jpOljsL8iJM_2Il7_znLzd370uHrPly8PT4naZQcmLKeMcpeCtE4WoayEACgQLKGsoBLTcocSiQNcKrpQSjVSNbCpbuhacEkqBOCdXB99NDO9bHCfdhW0c0kvNa8VK1YhaJlZzYEEM4xjR6ZRpbeKn5kzvm9Od_mtO75vTTOjUXJLOD1JMKXYeox7B4wBofUSYtA3-f5MfQ_58Yg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Chen, Minghua</creator><creator>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creator><creator>Serfes, Konstantinos</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><author>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Bundling</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Market structure</topic><topic>Media rights</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Political platform</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Service introduction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Television networks</topic><topic>Two-sided market</topic><topic>Vertical relations</topic><topic>À la carte regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Minghua</au><au>Rennhoff, Adam D.</au><au>Serfes, Konstantinos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</atitle><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><spage>30</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>30-44</pages><issn>0167-6245</issn><eissn>1873-5975</eissn><abstract>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6245
ispartof Information economics and policy, 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44
issn 0167-6245
1873-5975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1790498376
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index
subjects Advertising
Bundling
Economic models
Incentives
Market structure
Media rights
Monopolies
Negotiation
Networks
Political platform
Prices
Profits
Regulation
Service introduction
Studies
Television
Television networks
Two-sided market
Vertical relations
À la carte regulation
title Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bundling,%20%C3%A0%20la%20carte%20pricing%20and%20vertical%20bargaining%20in%20a%20two-sided%20model&rft.jtitle=Information%20economics%20and%20policy&rft.au=Chen,%20Minghua&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=35&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=30-44&rft.issn=0167-6245&rft.eissn=1873-5975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4064694111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790498376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true