Loading…
Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model
We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of adver...
Saved in:
Published in: | Information economics and policy 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3 |
container_end_page | 44 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Information economics and policy |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Chen, Minghua Rennhoff, Adam D. Serfes, Konstantinos |
description | We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1790498376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167624516300142</els_id><sourcerecordid>4064694111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMc_WOJKgh0nTnykFU9V4gJny1mvK0dpXJy0iL_hX_gxXBWJI6ddzc7MaoYQylnOGZc3Xe4HFxDCJvR5kZCciZwxfkRmvKlFVqm6OiazdKgzWZTVKTkbx44xlnY2I8_z7WB7P6yu6fcX7Q0FEyekm-ghgdQMlu4wTh5MT1sTV8YPe9wP1NDpI2Sjt2jpOljsL8iJM_2Il7_znLzd370uHrPly8PT4naZQcmLKeMcpeCtE4WoayEACgQLKGsoBLTcocSiQNcKrpQSjVSNbCpbuhacEkqBOCdXB99NDO9bHCfdhW0c0kvNa8VK1YhaJlZzYEEM4xjR6ZRpbeKn5kzvm9Od_mtO75vTTOjUXJLOD1JMKXYeox7B4wBofUSYtA3-f5MfQ_58Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790498376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><description>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Bundling ; Economic models ; Incentives ; Market structure ; Media rights ; Monopolies ; Negotiation ; Networks ; Political platform ; Prices ; Profits ; Regulation ; Service introduction ; Studies ; Television ; Television networks ; Two-sided market ; Vertical relations ; À la carte regulation</subject><ispartof>Information economics and policy, 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222,34134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><title>Information economics and policy</title><description>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Bundling</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Market structure</subject><subject>Media rights</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Political platform</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Service introduction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Television networks</subject><subject>Two-sided market</subject><subject>Vertical relations</subject><subject>À la carte regulation</subject><issn>0167-6245</issn><issn>1873-5975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMc_WOJKgh0nTnykFU9V4gJny1mvK0dpXJy0iL_hX_gxXBWJI6ddzc7MaoYQylnOGZc3Xe4HFxDCJvR5kZCciZwxfkRmvKlFVqm6OiazdKgzWZTVKTkbx44xlnY2I8_z7WB7P6yu6fcX7Q0FEyekm-ghgdQMlu4wTh5MT1sTV8YPe9wP1NDpI2Sjt2jpOljsL8iJM_2Il7_znLzd370uHrPly8PT4naZQcmLKeMcpeCtE4WoayEACgQLKGsoBLTcocSiQNcKrpQSjVSNbCpbuhacEkqBOCdXB99NDO9bHCfdhW0c0kvNa8VK1YhaJlZzYEEM4xjR6ZRpbeKn5kzvm9Od_mtO75vTTOjUXJLOD1JMKXYeox7B4wBofUSYtA3-f5MfQ_58Yg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Chen, Minghua</creator><creator>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creator><creator>Serfes, Konstantinos</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</title><author>Chen, Minghua ; Rennhoff, Adam D. ; Serfes, Konstantinos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Bundling</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Market structure</topic><topic>Media rights</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Political platform</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Service introduction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Television networks</topic><topic>Two-sided market</topic><topic>Vertical relations</topic><topic>À la carte regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennhoff, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfes, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Minghua</au><au>Rennhoff, Adam D.</au><au>Serfes, Konstantinos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model</atitle><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><spage>30</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>30-44</pages><issn>0167-6245</issn><eissn>1873-5975</eissn><abstract>We develop a two-sided market model with an upstream–downstream structure. More specifically, the platform consists of two rival upstream firms and a downstream monopolist. Each upstream firm negotiates the input price (license fee) with the downstream monopolist and also chooses the amount of advertising that is embedded in the good it sells to the downstream monopolist. The downstream monopolist can offer the two goods either on an à la carte basis or as a bundle. We use this model to understand the incentives to bundle and the welfare properties of bundling in a two-sided market framework. We also contribute to the ongoing debate on à la carte pricing in the TV industry, where the two upstream firms can be viewed as two rival TV networks and the downstream monopolist as a cable operator. We show that an à la carte regulation will raise consumer surplus and downstream profit, while it will decrease the profits of the upstream TV networks.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6245 |
ispartof | Information economics and policy, 2016-06, Vol.35, p.30-44 |
issn | 0167-6245 1873-5975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1790498376 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Advertising Bundling Economic models Incentives Market structure Media rights Monopolies Negotiation Networks Political platform Prices Profits Regulation Service introduction Studies Television Television networks Two-sided market Vertical relations À la carte regulation |
title | Bundling, à la carte pricing and vertical bargaining in a two-sided model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bundling,%20%C3%A0%20la%20carte%20pricing%20and%20vertical%20bargaining%20in%20a%20two-sided%20model&rft.jtitle=Information%20economics%20and%20policy&rft.au=Chen,%20Minghua&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=35&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=30-44&rft.issn=0167-6245&rft.eissn=1873-5975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4064694111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-11e631bf3237733cc2ecdce67c23cb1fe6e22efb3199938698685d4fbcf9399c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790498376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |