Loading…

CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS

Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on netw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contemporary economic policy 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571
Main Author: Luther, William J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3
container_end_page 571
container_issue 3
container_start_page 553
container_title Contemporary economic policy
container_volume 34
creator Luther, William J.
description Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/coep.12151
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791227691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A457693117</galeid><sourcerecordid>A457693117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0t1q2zAUAGBTNljX7WZPENjVRp3px5Liy6A6mVmwS-wSuhshK7LnzrFTy6Hr2-90ycoCoUwCWYjvWEfS8bwPGI0xtC-ms9sxJpjhM-8cB5z5gkzEK5gjEfiUkfCN99a5OwRNEHHucbm8vc5TebNcRomMo-xylET5Kl1-G0WzWSRzWJgmV6NsFefya5zMRzLN8uyd97rUjbPvD98L72YWAfAX6TyW04VvOMPYJ0EhKGGMorXliNIAGWKw1hPKqGWiKKlBxYRZvTZ6zcOgJCG3iAsSFiGmpKQX3sf9f7d9d7-zblB33a5vYUuFRYgJERzgs6p0Y1Xdlt3Qa7OpnVHTgAGhGAtQ_glV2db2uulaW9awfOTHJzz0td3U5mTAp6MAMIP9NVR655yKs-S_7WS-eCnxgzVd09jKKrhwmR77y398sXN1ax0Mrq5-DG6_xRH_vOem75zrbam2fb3R_aPCSD1VlXqqKvWnqgDjPX6Awz--IJVMo-u_MYf8awd5P8fo_qfiggqmVslcUXjOLP9OFKW_AYEX0Y4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791227691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Luther, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-3529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coep.12151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Competition ; Crypto-currencies ; Cryptocurrencies ; Currencies ; Digital currencies ; Economic aspects ; Economic models ; Externality ; Forecasts and trends ; Market trend/market analysis ; Money ; Networks ; Pricing policies ; Purchasing power ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Contemporary economic policy, 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571</ispartof><rights>2015 Western Economic Association International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Western Economic Association International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><title>Contemporary economic policy</title><addtitle>Contemp Econ Policy</addtitle><description>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crypto-currencies</subject><subject>Cryptocurrencies</subject><subject>Currencies</subject><subject>Digital currencies</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Market trend/market analysis</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Purchasing power</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1074-3529</issn><issn>1465-7287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0t1q2zAUAGBTNljX7WZPENjVRp3px5Liy6A6mVmwS-wSuhshK7LnzrFTy6Hr2-90ycoCoUwCWYjvWEfS8bwPGI0xtC-ms9sxJpjhM-8cB5z5gkzEK5gjEfiUkfCN99a5OwRNEHHucbm8vc5TebNcRomMo-xylET5Kl1-G0WzWSRzWJgmV6NsFefya5zMRzLN8uyd97rUjbPvD98L72YWAfAX6TyW04VvOMPYJ0EhKGGMorXliNIAGWKw1hPKqGWiKKlBxYRZvTZ6zcOgJCG3iAsSFiGmpKQX3sf9f7d9d7-zblB33a5vYUuFRYgJERzgs6p0Y1Xdlt3Qa7OpnVHTgAGhGAtQ_glV2db2uulaW9awfOTHJzz0td3U5mTAp6MAMIP9NVR655yKs-S_7WS-eCnxgzVd09jKKrhwmR77y398sXN1ax0Mrq5-DG6_xRH_vOem75zrbam2fb3R_aPCSD1VlXqqKvWnqgDjPX6Awz--IJVMo-u_MYf8awd5P8fo_qfiggqmVslcUXjOLP9OFKW_AYEX0Y4</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Luther, William J.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><author>Luther, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crypto-currencies</topic><topic>Cryptocurrencies</topic><topic>Currencies</topic><topic>Digital currencies</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Market trend/market analysis</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Purchasing power</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luther, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary economic policy</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Econ Policy</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>553-571</pages><issn>1074-3529</issn><eissn>1465-7287</eissn><abstract>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/coep.12151</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-3529
ispartof Contemporary economic policy, 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571
issn 1074-3529
1465-7287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1791227691
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Analysis
Competition
Crypto-currencies
Cryptocurrencies
Currencies
Digital currencies
Economic aspects
Economic models
Externality
Forecasts and trends
Market trend/market analysis
Money
Networks
Pricing policies
Purchasing power
Technology
title CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CRYPTOCURRENCIES,%20NETWORK%20EFFECTS,%20AND%20SWITCHING%20COSTS&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20economic%20policy&rft.au=Luther,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=553-571&rft.issn=1074-3529&rft.eissn=1465-7287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coep.12151&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA457693117%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791227691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A457693117&rfr_iscdi=true