Loading…
CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS
Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on netw...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contemporary economic policy 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3 |
container_end_page | 571 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Contemporary economic policy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Luther, William J. |
description | Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/coep.12151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1791227691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A457693117</galeid><sourcerecordid>A457693117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0t1q2zAUAGBTNljX7WZPENjVRp3px5Liy6A6mVmwS-wSuhshK7LnzrFTy6Hr2-90ycoCoUwCWYjvWEfS8bwPGI0xtC-ms9sxJpjhM-8cB5z5gkzEK5gjEfiUkfCN99a5OwRNEHHucbm8vc5TebNcRomMo-xylET5Kl1-G0WzWSRzWJgmV6NsFefya5zMRzLN8uyd97rUjbPvD98L72YWAfAX6TyW04VvOMPYJ0EhKGGMorXliNIAGWKw1hPKqGWiKKlBxYRZvTZ6zcOgJCG3iAsSFiGmpKQX3sf9f7d9d7-zblB33a5vYUuFRYgJERzgs6p0Y1Xdlt3Qa7OpnVHTgAGhGAtQ_glV2db2uulaW9awfOTHJzz0td3U5mTAp6MAMIP9NVR655yKs-S_7WS-eCnxgzVd09jKKrhwmR77y398sXN1ax0Mrq5-DG6_xRH_vOem75zrbam2fb3R_aPCSD1VlXqqKvWnqgDjPX6Awz--IJVMo-u_MYf8awd5P8fo_qfiggqmVslcUXjOLP9OFKW_AYEX0Y4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791227691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Luther, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-3529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coep.12151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Competition ; Crypto-currencies ; Cryptocurrencies ; Currencies ; Digital currencies ; Economic aspects ; Economic models ; Externality ; Forecasts and trends ; Market trend/market analysis ; Money ; Networks ; Pricing policies ; Purchasing power ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Contemporary economic policy, 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571</ispartof><rights>2015 Western Economic Association International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Western Economic Association International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><title>Contemporary economic policy</title><addtitle>Contemp Econ Policy</addtitle><description>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crypto-currencies</subject><subject>Cryptocurrencies</subject><subject>Currencies</subject><subject>Digital currencies</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Market trend/market analysis</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Purchasing power</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1074-3529</issn><issn>1465-7287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0t1q2zAUAGBTNljX7WZPENjVRp3px5Liy6A6mVmwS-wSuhshK7LnzrFTy6Hr2-90ycoCoUwCWYjvWEfS8bwPGI0xtC-ms9sxJpjhM-8cB5z5gkzEK5gjEfiUkfCN99a5OwRNEHHucbm8vc5TebNcRomMo-xylET5Kl1-G0WzWSRzWJgmV6NsFefya5zMRzLN8uyd97rUjbPvD98L72YWAfAX6TyW04VvOMPYJ0EhKGGMorXliNIAGWKw1hPKqGWiKKlBxYRZvTZ6zcOgJCG3iAsSFiGmpKQX3sf9f7d9d7-zblB33a5vYUuFRYgJERzgs6p0Y1Xdlt3Qa7OpnVHTgAGhGAtQ_glV2db2uulaW9awfOTHJzz0td3U5mTAp6MAMIP9NVR655yKs-S_7WS-eCnxgzVd09jKKrhwmR77y398sXN1ax0Mrq5-DG6_xRH_vOem75zrbam2fb3R_aPCSD1VlXqqKvWnqgDjPX6Awz--IJVMo-u_MYf8awd5P8fo_qfiggqmVslcUXjOLP9OFKW_AYEX0Y4</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Luther, William J.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</title><author>Luther, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crypto-currencies</topic><topic>Cryptocurrencies</topic><topic>Currencies</topic><topic>Digital currencies</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Market trend/market analysis</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Purchasing power</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luther, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luther, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary economic policy</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Econ Policy</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>553-571</pages><issn>1074-3529</issn><eissn>1465-7287</eissn><abstract>Cryptocurrencies are digital alternatives to traditional government‐issued paper monies. Given the current state of technology and skepticism regarding the future purchasing power of existing monies, why have cryptocurrencies failed to gain widespread acceptance? I offer an explanation based on network effects and switching costs. In order to articulate the problem that agents considering cryptocurrencies face, I employ a simple model developed by Dowd and Greenaway (1993) (Dowd, K., and D. Greenaway. “Currency Competition, Network Externalities, and Switching Costs: Towards an Alternative View of Optimum Currency Areas.” The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1993, 1180–89). The model demonstrates that agents may fail to adopt an alternative currency when network effects and switching costs are present, even if all agents agree that the prevailing currency is inferior. The limited success of bitcoin—almost certainly the most popular cryptocurrency to date—serves to illustrate. After briefly surveying episodes of successful monetary transition, I conclude that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are unlikely to generate widespread acceptance in the absence of either significant monetary instability or government support. (JEL E40, E41, E42, E49)</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/coep.12151</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1074-3529 |
ispartof | Contemporary economic policy, 2016-07, Vol.34 (3), p.553-571 |
issn | 1074-3529 1465-7287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1791227691 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Analysis Competition Crypto-currencies Cryptocurrencies Currencies Digital currencies Economic aspects Economic models Externality Forecasts and trends Market trend/market analysis Money Networks Pricing policies Purchasing power Technology |
title | CRYPTOCURRENCIES, NETWORK EFFECTS, AND SWITCHING COSTS |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CRYPTOCURRENCIES,%20NETWORK%20EFFECTS,%20AND%20SWITCHING%20COSTS&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20economic%20policy&rft.au=Luther,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=553-571&rft.issn=1074-3529&rft.eissn=1465-7287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coep.12151&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA457693117%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6511-24b7325530de603340c2c1aa8353e57bf3c0b85eadcad694f296e06729b9132f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791227691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A457693117&rfr_iscdi=true |