Loading…
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH
The increase in agricultural commodity prices in the recent past has renewed interest in ascertaining the factors that drive agricultural commodity prices. Though a number of factors are possible, higher oil prices are thought to be the major factor driving up agricultural commodity prices, especial...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of developing areas 2016-03, Vol.50 (2), p.137-152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 152 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | The Journal of developing areas |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Balcilar, Mehmet Chang, Shinhye Gupta, Rangan Kasongo, Vanessa Kyei, Clement |
description | The increase in agricultural commodity prices in the recent past has renewed interest in ascertaining the factors that drive agricultural commodity prices. Though a number of factors are possible, higher oil prices are thought to be the major factor driving up agricultural commodity prices, especially as the demand for biofuels production increases. However, empirical evidence of this relationship remain ambiguous and largely depends on the method used. For this reason, there is a need to examine the relationship in the context of different methodologies. Furthermore, information on how South African commodity prices respond to world oil price shocks is less certain. A good understanding of the factors that drive local commodity prices will assist in making sound agricultural policies. In this paper, the Granger causality test is applied to the mean to investigate the causality between oil prices and agricultural (soya beans, wheat, sunflower and corn) commodity prices in South Africa. Daily data spanning from 19 April 2005 to 31 July 2014 is used for Brent crude oil, corn, wheat, sunflower and soya beans prices. Agricultural commodity prices were obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and the series of Brent crude oil prices from the U.S. Department of Energy. Results from the linear causality test indicate that oil prices do not influence agricultural commodity prices. However, owing to structural breaks and nonlinear dependence between the variables of study, these results are misleading. As an alternative, the nonparametric test of Granger causality in quantiles, as proposed by Jeong, Härdle and Song (2012) is used. Through this test, we not only look at causality beyond the mean estimates but also accounts for the structural breaks and nonlinear dependence present in the data. Additionally, the method becomes more instructive in the case where the distribution of variables has fat tails. The findings show that the effect of changes in oil prices on agricultural commodity prices vary across the different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The highest impact is not at the median, and the impact on the tails is lower compared to the rest of the distribution. The analysis shows that the relationship between oil prices and agricultural commodity prices depends on specific phases of the market, and therefore contradicts the neutrality hypothesis that oil prices do not cause agricultural commodity prices in South Africa. This implies that pol |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jda.2016.0089 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1796291879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A456679670</galeid><jstor_id>24737388</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A456679670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-3a5bae30dca17a743a839f109eee2e0c7d61cff813cc5f6d5ecd580370c104013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt2LnDAUxaW00Om2j30sBPpaZ_OhJvYtdd1VcHU6Km2fQjbGqcOou0Yf-t83sstuC0MgIYffuTe5HMf5iOAWEZ9cHhu5xRAFWwhZ-MrZIN9jLsaUvXY2EGLsQkJ_vnXeGXO0V0o8tHH6KonBPs54lRZ5maQ78C2ufsRxDoo0Azy_Avxmn0Z1VtV7noGouL0trtLqF9hZNS5BmoOyqKsE8Gsr8K-Ag-81z6s0i0HE65JnK8x3u33Bo-S986aVJ6M_PJ0XTn0dV1HiZsWNdWeuIpSFLpH-ndQENkoiKqlHJCNhi2CotcYaKtoESLUtQ0Qpvw0aX6vGZ_Z3UCHoQUQunM-Pde-n8WHRZhbHcZkG21IgGgY4RIyGL9RBnrTohnacJ6n6zijBPT8ILEmhpdwz1EEPepKncdBtZ-X_-O0Z3q5G9506a_jyj-FuMd2gjd1Md_g9m4NcjDn7HjWNxky6FfdT18vpj0BQrDkQNgdizYFYc2B573kWR63mfjH6ZRwBRsSDolyzskYFBRha29rm06PtaOZxeu6BPUooYYz8BU4Gs6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796291879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Balcilar, Mehmet ; Chang, Shinhye ; Gupta, Rangan ; Kasongo, Vanessa ; Kyei, Clement</creator><creatorcontrib>Balcilar, Mehmet ; Chang, Shinhye ; Gupta, Rangan ; Kasongo, Vanessa ; Kyei, Clement</creatorcontrib><description>The increase in agricultural commodity prices in the recent past has renewed interest in ascertaining the factors that drive agricultural commodity prices. Though a number of factors are possible, higher oil prices are thought to be the major factor driving up agricultural commodity prices, especially as the demand for biofuels production increases. However, empirical evidence of this relationship remain ambiguous and largely depends on the method used. For this reason, there is a need to examine the relationship in the context of different methodologies. Furthermore, information on how South African commodity prices respond to world oil price shocks is less certain. A good understanding of the factors that drive local commodity prices will assist in making sound agricultural policies. In this paper, the Granger causality test is applied to the mean to investigate the causality between oil prices and agricultural (soya beans, wheat, sunflower and corn) commodity prices in South Africa. Daily data spanning from 19 April 2005 to 31 July 2014 is used for Brent crude oil, corn, wheat, sunflower and soya beans prices. Agricultural commodity prices were obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and the series of Brent crude oil prices from the U.S. Department of Energy. Results from the linear causality test indicate that oil prices do not influence agricultural commodity prices. However, owing to structural breaks and nonlinear dependence between the variables of study, these results are misleading. As an alternative, the nonparametric test of Granger causality in quantiles, as proposed by Jeong, Härdle and Song (2012) is used. Through this test, we not only look at causality beyond the mean estimates but also accounts for the structural breaks and nonlinear dependence present in the data. Additionally, the method becomes more instructive in the case where the distribution of variables has fat tails. The findings show that the effect of changes in oil prices on agricultural commodity prices vary across the different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The highest impact is not at the median, and the impact on the tails is lower compared to the rest of the distribution. The analysis shows that the relationship between oil prices and agricultural commodity prices depends on specific phases of the market, and therefore contradicts the neutrality hypothesis that oil prices do not cause agricultural commodity prices in South Africa. This implies that policies to stabilize domestic agricultural commodity prices must consider developments in the world oil markets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-037X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1548-2278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jda.2016.0089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDARB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: College of Business at Tennessee State University</publisher><subject>Agricultural commodities ; Agricultural policy ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Causality ; Commodity price indexes ; Commodity prices ; Crude oil ; Crude oil prices ; Economic models ; Energy ; Farm produce ; Food ; Petroleum ; Prices and rates ; Production increases ; Soybeans ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of developing areas, 2016-03, Vol.50 (2), p.137-152</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Tennessee State University.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Tennessee State University</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Developing Areas Spring 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1796291879/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1796291879?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,58238,58471,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balcilar, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Shinhye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rangan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasongo, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyei, Clement</creatorcontrib><title>THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH</title><title>The Journal of developing areas</title><description>The increase in agricultural commodity prices in the recent past has renewed interest in ascertaining the factors that drive agricultural commodity prices. Though a number of factors are possible, higher oil prices are thought to be the major factor driving up agricultural commodity prices, especially as the demand for biofuels production increases. However, empirical evidence of this relationship remain ambiguous and largely depends on the method used. For this reason, there is a need to examine the relationship in the context of different methodologies. Furthermore, information on how South African commodity prices respond to world oil price shocks is less certain. A good understanding of the factors that drive local commodity prices will assist in making sound agricultural policies. In this paper, the Granger causality test is applied to the mean to investigate the causality between oil prices and agricultural (soya beans, wheat, sunflower and corn) commodity prices in South Africa. Daily data spanning from 19 April 2005 to 31 July 2014 is used for Brent crude oil, corn, wheat, sunflower and soya beans prices. Agricultural commodity prices were obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and the series of Brent crude oil prices from the U.S. Department of Energy. Results from the linear causality test indicate that oil prices do not influence agricultural commodity prices. However, owing to structural breaks and nonlinear dependence between the variables of study, these results are misleading. As an alternative, the nonparametric test of Granger causality in quantiles, as proposed by Jeong, Härdle and Song (2012) is used. Through this test, we not only look at causality beyond the mean estimates but also accounts for the structural breaks and nonlinear dependence present in the data. Additionally, the method becomes more instructive in the case where the distribution of variables has fat tails. The findings show that the effect of changes in oil prices on agricultural commodity prices vary across the different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The highest impact is not at the median, and the impact on the tails is lower compared to the rest of the distribution. The analysis shows that the relationship between oil prices and agricultural commodity prices depends on specific phases of the market, and therefore contradicts the neutrality hypothesis that oil prices do not cause agricultural commodity prices in South Africa. This implies that policies to stabilize domestic agricultural commodity prices must consider developments in the world oil markets.</description><subject>Agricultural commodities</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Commodity price indexes</subject><subject>Commodity prices</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Crude oil prices</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Farm produce</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Prices and rates</subject><subject>Production increases</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-037X</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt2LnDAUxaW00Om2j30sBPpaZ_OhJvYtdd1VcHU6Km2fQjbGqcOou0Yf-t83sstuC0MgIYffuTe5HMf5iOAWEZ9cHhu5xRAFWwhZ-MrZIN9jLsaUvXY2EGLsQkJ_vnXeGXO0V0o8tHH6KonBPs54lRZ5maQ78C2ufsRxDoo0Azy_Avxmn0Z1VtV7noGouL0trtLqF9hZNS5BmoOyqKsE8Gsr8K-Ag-81z6s0i0HE65JnK8x3u33Bo-S986aVJ6M_PJ0XTn0dV1HiZsWNdWeuIpSFLpH-ndQENkoiKqlHJCNhi2CotcYaKtoESLUtQ0Qpvw0aX6vGZ_Z3UCHoQUQunM-Pde-n8WHRZhbHcZkG21IgGgY4RIyGL9RBnrTohnacJ6n6zijBPT8ILEmhpdwz1EEPepKncdBtZ-X_-O0Z3q5G9506a_jyj-FuMd2gjd1Md_g9m4NcjDn7HjWNxky6FfdT18vpj0BQrDkQNgdizYFYc2B573kWR63mfjH6ZRwBRsSDolyzskYFBRha29rm06PtaOZxeu6BPUooYYz8BU4Gs6Y</recordid><startdate>20160322</startdate><enddate>20160322</enddate><creator>Balcilar, Mehmet</creator><creator>Chang, Shinhye</creator><creator>Gupta, Rangan</creator><creator>Kasongo, Vanessa</creator><creator>Kyei, Clement</creator><general>College of Business at Tennessee State University</general><general>Tennessee State University College of Business</general><general>Tennessee State University</general><general>Journal of Developing Areas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160322</creationdate><title>THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH</title><author>Balcilar, Mehmet ; Chang, Shinhye ; Gupta, Rangan ; Kasongo, Vanessa ; Kyei, Clement</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-3a5bae30dca17a743a839f109eee2e0c7d61cff813cc5f6d5ecd580370c104013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural commodities</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Commodity price indexes</topic><topic>Commodity prices</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Crude oil prices</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Farm produce</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Prices and rates</topic><topic>Production increases</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balcilar, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Shinhye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rangan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasongo, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyei, Clement</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of developing areas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balcilar, Mehmet</au><au>Chang, Shinhye</au><au>Gupta, Rangan</au><au>Kasongo, Vanessa</au><au>Kyei, Clement</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of developing areas</jtitle><date>2016-03-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>137-152</pages><issn>0022-037X</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><eissn>1548-2278</eissn><coden>JDARB4</coden><abstract>The increase in agricultural commodity prices in the recent past has renewed interest in ascertaining the factors that drive agricultural commodity prices. Though a number of factors are possible, higher oil prices are thought to be the major factor driving up agricultural commodity prices, especially as the demand for biofuels production increases. However, empirical evidence of this relationship remain ambiguous and largely depends on the method used. For this reason, there is a need to examine the relationship in the context of different methodologies. Furthermore, information on how South African commodity prices respond to world oil price shocks is less certain. A good understanding of the factors that drive local commodity prices will assist in making sound agricultural policies. In this paper, the Granger causality test is applied to the mean to investigate the causality between oil prices and agricultural (soya beans, wheat, sunflower and corn) commodity prices in South Africa. Daily data spanning from 19 April 2005 to 31 July 2014 is used for Brent crude oil, corn, wheat, sunflower and soya beans prices. Agricultural commodity prices were obtained from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and the series of Brent crude oil prices from the U.S. Department of Energy. Results from the linear causality test indicate that oil prices do not influence agricultural commodity prices. However, owing to structural breaks and nonlinear dependence between the variables of study, these results are misleading. As an alternative, the nonparametric test of Granger causality in quantiles, as proposed by Jeong, Härdle and Song (2012) is used. Through this test, we not only look at causality beyond the mean estimates but also accounts for the structural breaks and nonlinear dependence present in the data. Additionally, the method becomes more instructive in the case where the distribution of variables has fat tails. The findings show that the effect of changes in oil prices on agricultural commodity prices vary across the different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The highest impact is not at the median, and the impact on the tails is lower compared to the rest of the distribution. The analysis shows that the relationship between oil prices and agricultural commodity prices depends on specific phases of the market, and therefore contradicts the neutrality hypothesis that oil prices do not cause agricultural commodity prices in South Africa. This implies that policies to stabilize domestic agricultural commodity prices must consider developments in the world oil markets.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>College of Business at Tennessee State University</pub><doi>10.1353/jda.2016.0089</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-037X |
ispartof | The Journal of developing areas, 2016-03, Vol.50 (2), p.137-152 |
issn | 0022-037X 1548-2278 1548-2278 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1796291879 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection |
subjects | Agricultural commodities Agricultural policy Agriculture Analysis Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Causality Commodity price indexes Commodity prices Crude oil Crude oil prices Economic models Energy Farm produce Food Petroleum Prices and rates Production increases Soybeans Studies |
title | THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OIL AND AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY PRICES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUANTILE CAUSALITY APPROACH |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20RELATIONSHIP%20BETWEEN%20OIL%20AND%20AGRICULTURAL%20COMMODITY%20PRICES%20IN%20SOUTH%20AFRICA:%20A%20QUANTILE%20CAUSALITY%20APPROACH&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20developing%20areas&rft.au=Balcilar,%20Mehmet&rft.date=2016-03-22&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=137-152&rft.issn=0022-037X&rft.eissn=1548-2278&rft.coden=JDARB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jda.2016.0089&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA456679670%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-3a5bae30dca17a743a839f109eee2e0c7d61cff813cc5f6d5ecd580370c104013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796291879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A456679670&rft_jstor_id=24737388&rfr_iscdi=true |