How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states' alignment behavior towards China

The extant literature on alignment behavior has focused primarily on the macro dimensions, i.e. the typology, manifestations and implications of states' alignment choices vis-à-vis the great power(s). Relatively few studies have examined the micro aspects of alignment choices. This article atte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of contemporary China 2016-07, Vol.25 (100), p.500-514
Main Author: Kuik, Cheng-Chwee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alignment
Cold War
Foreign policy
Geopolitics
Hedges/Hedging
Hedging
International organizations
International relations
Post Cold War period
Power structure
Regional organizations
Risk
Typology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The extant literature on alignment behavior has focused primarily on the macro dimensions, i.e. the typology, manifestations and implications of states' alignment choices vis-à-vis the great power(s). Relatively few studies have examined the micro aspects of alignment choices. This article attempts to fill in the gap by unpacking the constituent component of weaker states' alignment decisions, with a focus on ASEAN states' hedging behavior in the face of a rising China in the post-Cold War era. It contends that the enduring uncertainty at the systemic level has compelled the states to hedge by pursuing contradictory, mutually counteracting transactions of 'returns-maximizing' and 'risk-contingency' options, which seek to offset the potential drawbacks of one another, as a way to project a non-taking-sides stance while keeping their own fallback position at a time when the prospect of power structure is far from clear.
ISSN:1067-0564
1469-9400
DOI:10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714