Loading…

Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland

Background Tick-borne infections are no longer confined to rural areas, they are documented with increasing frequency in urban settlements across the world. They are known to cause diseases in humans as well as in their companion animals. Methods During a period of 2 years, from January 2013 until D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Parasites & vectors 2016-01, Vol.9
Main Authors: Krol, Nina, Obiegala, Anna, Pfeffer, Martin, Lonc, Elzbieta, Kiewra, Dorota
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Parasites & vectors
container_volume 9
creator Krol, Nina
Obiegala, Anna
Pfeffer, Martin
Lonc, Elzbieta
Kiewra, Dorota
description Background Tick-borne infections are no longer confined to rural areas, they are documented with increasing frequency in urban settlements across the world. They are known to cause diseases in humans as well as in their companion animals. Methods During a period of 2 years, from January 2013 until December 2014, ticks were collected from dogs and cats in 18 veterinary clinics in the Wroclaw Agglomeration, Poland. In total, 1455 ticks were found on 931 pets: 760 domestic dogs and 171 cats. For molecular examinations 127 I. ricinus ticks (115 females and 12 males) were randomly selected, all collected I. hexagonus (n = 137, 32 females, 98 nymphs, 7 larvae) and all collected D. reticulatus (n = 46, 31 females, 15 males) were taken. Ixodes ricinus and I. hexagonus ticks were tested for Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Babesia spp., while D. reticulatus ticks were investigated for Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp. only. Results In total, 65.4 % I. ricinus ticks were infected with at least one pathogen. Over 50 % of I. ricinus were positive for Rickettsia spp. (R. helvetica and R. monacensis). The infection level with A. phagocytophilum was 21.3 %. DNA of Cand. N. mikurensis was detected in 8.1 % I. ricinus ticks. Interestingly only female ticks were infected. The prevalence of Babesia spp. was confirmed in 9.0 % of I. ricinus involving the species B. microti and B. venatorum. A total of nineteen double, one triple and two quadruple infections were found in I. ricinus ticks only. Almost 11 % of I. hexagonus ticks were positive for at least one of the tested pathogens. Rickettsia spp. infection was found in 2.2 %, while A. phagocytophilum was detected in 8.1 % of I. hexagonus ticks. Only one nymph was positive for Cand. N. mikurensis and none of I. hexagonus ticks harbored a Babesia spp. Over 60 % of D. reticulatus ticks were positive for rickettsial DNA, exclusively belonging to the species R. raoultii. Conclusion The high tick infestation rates and the prevalence of pathogens found in these ticks demonstrate a serious level of encounter to tick-borne diseases in urban dogs in the Wroclaw area, and provide evidence that dogs and cats themselves may substantially contribute to the circulation of the ticks and pathogens in the urban area.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13071-016-1632-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1800857125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4105938081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18008571253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1KAzEUhUNBaNU-gLsLbo29tyGZ6VL8wWWhQpclZDI_Nc2tSQZf3xH7AK4Oh-87R4g7wkei2qwyKaxIIhlJRq0lzsSCKm2kUqjn4jrnI6LBjTYLUV588a4MHIFbyD5MxTdwtqXnzscMQ4QyuM8MjsMFtolP4GzJYGMDDXd_Vu9hn9jZb3jqusAnn-zv7wPseCy93PtcYMth2tyKq9aG7JeXvBH3b68fz-_ynPhrnLzDkccUJ3SgGrHWFa21-p_1A4ajUIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800857125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Krol, Nina ; Obiegala, Anna ; Pfeffer, Martin ; Lonc, Elzbieta ; Kiewra, Dorota</creator><creatorcontrib>Krol, Nina ; Obiegala, Anna ; Pfeffer, Martin ; Lonc, Elzbieta ; Kiewra, Dorota</creatorcontrib><description>Background Tick-borne infections are no longer confined to rural areas, they are documented with increasing frequency in urban settlements across the world. They are known to cause diseases in humans as well as in their companion animals. Methods During a period of 2 years, from January 2013 until December 2014, ticks were collected from dogs and cats in 18 veterinary clinics in the Wroclaw Agglomeration, Poland. In total, 1455 ticks were found on 931 pets: 760 domestic dogs and 171 cats. For molecular examinations 127 I. ricinus ticks (115 females and 12 males) were randomly selected, all collected I. hexagonus (n = 137, 32 females, 98 nymphs, 7 larvae) and all collected D. reticulatus (n = 46, 31 females, 15 males) were taken. Ixodes ricinus and I. hexagonus ticks were tested for Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Babesia spp., while D. reticulatus ticks were investigated for Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp. only. Results In total, 65.4 % I. ricinus ticks were infected with at least one pathogen. Over 50 % of I. ricinus were positive for Rickettsia spp. (R. helvetica and R. monacensis). The infection level with A. phagocytophilum was 21.3 %. DNA of Cand. N. mikurensis was detected in 8.1 % I. ricinus ticks. Interestingly only female ticks were infected. The prevalence of Babesia spp. was confirmed in 9.0 % of I. ricinus involving the species B. microti and B. venatorum. A total of nineteen double, one triple and two quadruple infections were found in I. ricinus ticks only. Almost 11 % of I. hexagonus ticks were positive for at least one of the tested pathogens. Rickettsia spp. infection was found in 2.2 %, while A. phagocytophilum was detected in 8.1 % of I. hexagonus ticks. Only one nymph was positive for Cand. N. mikurensis and none of I. hexagonus ticks harbored a Babesia spp. Over 60 % of D. reticulatus ticks were positive for rickettsial DNA, exclusively belonging to the species R. raoultii. Conclusion The high tick infestation rates and the prevalence of pathogens found in these ticks demonstrate a serious level of encounter to tick-borne diseases in urban dogs in the Wroclaw area, and provide evidence that dogs and cats themselves may substantially contribute to the circulation of the ticks and pathogens in the urban area.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1632-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central</publisher><ispartof>Parasites &amp; vectors, 2016-01, Vol.9</ispartof><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1800857125?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krol, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obiegala, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeffer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lonc, Elzbieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiewra, Dorota</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland</title><title>Parasites &amp; vectors</title><description>Background Tick-borne infections are no longer confined to rural areas, they are documented with increasing frequency in urban settlements across the world. They are known to cause diseases in humans as well as in their companion animals. Methods During a period of 2 years, from January 2013 until December 2014, ticks were collected from dogs and cats in 18 veterinary clinics in the Wroclaw Agglomeration, Poland. In total, 1455 ticks were found on 931 pets: 760 domestic dogs and 171 cats. For molecular examinations 127 I. ricinus ticks (115 females and 12 males) were randomly selected, all collected I. hexagonus (n = 137, 32 females, 98 nymphs, 7 larvae) and all collected D. reticulatus (n = 46, 31 females, 15 males) were taken. Ixodes ricinus and I. hexagonus ticks were tested for Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Babesia spp., while D. reticulatus ticks were investigated for Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp. only. Results In total, 65.4 % I. ricinus ticks were infected with at least one pathogen. Over 50 % of I. ricinus were positive for Rickettsia spp. (R. helvetica and R. monacensis). The infection level with A. phagocytophilum was 21.3 %. DNA of Cand. N. mikurensis was detected in 8.1 % I. ricinus ticks. Interestingly only female ticks were infected. The prevalence of Babesia spp. was confirmed in 9.0 % of I. ricinus involving the species B. microti and B. venatorum. A total of nineteen double, one triple and two quadruple infections were found in I. ricinus ticks only. Almost 11 % of I. hexagonus ticks were positive for at least one of the tested pathogens. Rickettsia spp. infection was found in 2.2 %, while A. phagocytophilum was detected in 8.1 % of I. hexagonus ticks. Only one nymph was positive for Cand. N. mikurensis and none of I. hexagonus ticks harbored a Babesia spp. Over 60 % of D. reticulatus ticks were positive for rickettsial DNA, exclusively belonging to the species R. raoultii. Conclusion The high tick infestation rates and the prevalence of pathogens found in these ticks demonstrate a serious level of encounter to tick-borne diseases in urban dogs in the Wroclaw area, and provide evidence that dogs and cats themselves may substantially contribute to the circulation of the ticks and pathogens in the urban area.</description><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1KAzEUhUNBaNU-gLsLbo29tyGZ6VL8wWWhQpclZDI_Nc2tSQZf3xH7AK4Oh-87R4g7wkei2qwyKaxIIhlJRq0lzsSCKm2kUqjn4jrnI6LBjTYLUV588a4MHIFbyD5MxTdwtqXnzscMQ4QyuM8MjsMFtolP4GzJYGMDDXd_Vu9hn9jZb3jqusAnn-zv7wPseCy93PtcYMth2tyKq9aG7JeXvBH3b68fz-_ynPhrnLzDkccUJ3SgGrHWFa21-p_1A4ajUIs</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Krol, Nina</creator><creator>Obiegala, Anna</creator><creator>Pfeffer, Martin</creator><creator>Lonc, Elzbieta</creator><creator>Kiewra, Dorota</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland</title><author>Krol, Nina ; Obiegala, Anna ; Pfeffer, Martin ; Lonc, Elzbieta ; Kiewra, Dorota</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18008571253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krol, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obiegala, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeffer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lonc, Elzbieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiewra, Dorota</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krol, Nina</au><au>Obiegala, Anna</au><au>Pfeffer, Martin</au><au>Lonc, Elzbieta</au><au>Kiewra, Dorota</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland</atitle><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>Background Tick-borne infections are no longer confined to rural areas, they are documented with increasing frequency in urban settlements across the world. They are known to cause diseases in humans as well as in their companion animals. Methods During a period of 2 years, from January 2013 until December 2014, ticks were collected from dogs and cats in 18 veterinary clinics in the Wroclaw Agglomeration, Poland. In total, 1455 ticks were found on 931 pets: 760 domestic dogs and 171 cats. For molecular examinations 127 I. ricinus ticks (115 females and 12 males) were randomly selected, all collected I. hexagonus (n = 137, 32 females, 98 nymphs, 7 larvae) and all collected D. reticulatus (n = 46, 31 females, 15 males) were taken. Ixodes ricinus and I. hexagonus ticks were tested for Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Babesia spp., while D. reticulatus ticks were investigated for Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp. only. Results In total, 65.4 % I. ricinus ticks were infected with at least one pathogen. Over 50 % of I. ricinus were positive for Rickettsia spp. (R. helvetica and R. monacensis). The infection level with A. phagocytophilum was 21.3 %. DNA of Cand. N. mikurensis was detected in 8.1 % I. ricinus ticks. Interestingly only female ticks were infected. The prevalence of Babesia spp. was confirmed in 9.0 % of I. ricinus involving the species B. microti and B. venatorum. A total of nineteen double, one triple and two quadruple infections were found in I. ricinus ticks only. Almost 11 % of I. hexagonus ticks were positive for at least one of the tested pathogens. Rickettsia spp. infection was found in 2.2 %, while A. phagocytophilum was detected in 8.1 % of I. hexagonus ticks. Only one nymph was positive for Cand. N. mikurensis and none of I. hexagonus ticks harbored a Babesia spp. Over 60 % of D. reticulatus ticks were positive for rickettsial DNA, exclusively belonging to the species R. raoultii. Conclusion The high tick infestation rates and the prevalence of pathogens found in these ticks demonstrate a serious level of encounter to tick-borne diseases in urban dogs in the Wroclaw area, and provide evidence that dogs and cats themselves may substantially contribute to the circulation of the ticks and pathogens in the urban area.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><doi>10.1186/s13071-016-1632-0</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1756-3305
ispartof Parasites & vectors, 2016-01, Vol.9
issn 1756-3305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1800857125
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
title Detection of selected pathogens in ticks collected from cats and dogs in the Wrocaw Agglomeration, South-West Poland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20selected%20pathogens%20in%20ticks%20collected%20from%20cats%20and%20dogs%20in%20the%20Wrocaw%20Agglomeration,%20South-West%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Krol,%20Nina&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-016-1632-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4105938081%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18008571253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800857125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true