Loading…

Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection

This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of educational psychology 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704
Main Authors: Gao, Yuan, Liu, Tzu-Chien, Paas, Fred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993
cites
container_end_page 704
container_issue 5
container_start_page 694
container_title Journal of educational psychology
container_volume 108
creator Gao, Yuan
Liu, Tzu-Chien
Paas, Fred
description This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/edu0000080
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1802451055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1105648</ericid><sourcerecordid>1724322666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5evAsBb2JrpZNOOt6WYdxVZvHf6jXUdFeWXnuTMekW9uv4SU0zy64nQ-AR3q9ehSrGngt4I0Cat9TPsJwWHrCVsNJWtTD6IVsB1HUFWsvH7EnOVwWR5bFif7beUzdlHj0_jz0teoHpkqYi-Sf_RmOxhxh4uTvCFIZwyU_2cZ745xFDqRwCx1K7H0a6J7bh95BiuKYwveOlR0yTn0d-jmHG8Z_UH5TynG-JkXLmX75Wm-Ujd8xT9sjjmOnZra7Z9_fbi81Ztft0-mFzsqtQKj1VQmtAsTc9KGmwbZTxVjStlARKN33vEXoB1PY1AFptvGltR0qhNha0tXLNXh5zDyn-milP7irOKZSWTrRQq0ZA0_yXMrWSda3LYNfs1ZHqUsw5kXeHNFxjunEC3LIpd7-pAr84wpSG7g7cfhSloVZt8V8ffTygO-SbDtM0dGVY3ZxSGfCSVUJb1zhtlfwLPL-eqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1724322666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred</creator><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred ; Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Coding ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative studies ; Difficulty Level ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Elementary School Students ; Female ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Foreign Countries ; Grade 5 ; Grade 6 ; Handheld Devices ; Human ; Human Channel Capacity ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Knowledge Level ; Learning Environment ; Male ; Mobile Devices ; Mobile Learning ; Morphology ; Multiple Choice Tests ; Online instruction ; Plants (Botany) ; Quick Response ; School environment ; Selection ; Short Term Memory ; Statistical Analysis ; Taiwan ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education ; Telecommunications</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1105648$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</description><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Handheld Devices</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Channel Capacity</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning Environment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobile Devices</subject><subject>Mobile Learning</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Multiple Choice Tests</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Plants (Botany)</subject><subject>Quick Response</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Selection</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5evAsBb2JrpZNOOt6WYdxVZvHf6jXUdFeWXnuTMekW9uv4SU0zy64nQ-AR3q9ehSrGngt4I0Cat9TPsJwWHrCVsNJWtTD6IVsB1HUFWsvH7EnOVwWR5bFif7beUzdlHj0_jz0teoHpkqYi-Sf_RmOxhxh4uTvCFIZwyU_2cZ745xFDqRwCx1K7H0a6J7bh95BiuKYwveOlR0yTn0d-jmHG8Z_UH5TynG-JkXLmX75Wm-Ujd8xT9sjjmOnZra7Z9_fbi81Ztft0-mFzsqtQKj1VQmtAsTc9KGmwbZTxVjStlARKN33vEXoB1PY1AFptvGltR0qhNha0tXLNXh5zDyn-milP7irOKZSWTrRQq0ZA0_yXMrWSda3LYNfs1ZHqUsw5kXeHNFxjunEC3LIpd7-pAr84wpSG7g7cfhSloVZt8V8ffTygO-SbDtM0dGVY3ZxSGfCSVUJb1zhtlfwLPL-eqw</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Gao, Yuan</creator><creator>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creator><creator>Paas, Fred</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><author>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Handheld Devices</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Channel Capacity</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning Environment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobile Devices</topic><topic>Mobile Learning</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Multiple Choice Tests</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Plants (Botany)</topic><topic>Quick Response</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Selection</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yuan</au><au>Liu, Tzu-Chien</au><au>Paas, Fred</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1105648</ericid><atitle>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>704</epage><pages>694-704</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPAS</coden><abstract>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/edu0000080</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0663
ispartof Journal of educational psychology, 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704
issn 0022-0663
1939-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1802451055
source PsycArticles (EBSCO); ERIC
subjects Coding
Cognitive Processes
Comparative studies
Difficulty Level
Education
Educational Technology
Electronic Learning
Elementary School Students
Female
Flowers & plants
Foreign Countries
Grade 5
Grade 6
Handheld Devices
Human
Human Channel Capacity
Instructional Effectiveness
Knowledge Level
Learning Environment
Male
Mobile Devices
Mobile Learning
Morphology
Multiple Choice Tests
Online instruction
Plants (Botany)
Quick Response
School environment
Selection
Short Term Memory
Statistical Analysis
Taiwan
Teaching Methods
Technology Uses in Education
Telecommunications
title Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Mode%20of%20Target%20Task%20Selection%20on%20Learning%20About%20Plants%20in%20a%20Mobile%20Learning%20Environment:%20Effortful%20Manual%20Selection%20Versus%20Effortless%20QR-Code%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Gao,%20Yuan&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=704&rft.pages=694-704&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1724322666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1724322666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1105648&rfr_iscdi=true