Loading…
Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection
This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effecti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of educational psychology 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 704 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 694 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Gao, Yuan Liu, Tzu-Chien Paas, Fred |
description | This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/edu0000080 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1802451055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1105648</ericid><sourcerecordid>1724322666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5evAsBb2JrpZNOOt6WYdxVZvHf6jXUdFeWXnuTMekW9uv4SU0zy64nQ-AR3q9ehSrGngt4I0Cat9TPsJwWHrCVsNJWtTD6IVsB1HUFWsvH7EnOVwWR5bFif7beUzdlHj0_jz0teoHpkqYi-Sf_RmOxhxh4uTvCFIZwyU_2cZ745xFDqRwCx1K7H0a6J7bh95BiuKYwveOlR0yTn0d-jmHG8Z_UH5TynG-JkXLmX75Wm-Ujd8xT9sjjmOnZra7Z9_fbi81Ztft0-mFzsqtQKj1VQmtAsTc9KGmwbZTxVjStlARKN33vEXoB1PY1AFptvGltR0qhNha0tXLNXh5zDyn-milP7irOKZSWTrRQq0ZA0_yXMrWSda3LYNfs1ZHqUsw5kXeHNFxjunEC3LIpd7-pAr84wpSG7g7cfhSloVZt8V8ffTygO-SbDtM0dGVY3ZxSGfCSVUJb1zhtlfwLPL-eqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1724322666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred</creator><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred ; Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Coding ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative studies ; Difficulty Level ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Elementary School Students ; Female ; Flowers & plants ; Foreign Countries ; Grade 5 ; Grade 6 ; Handheld Devices ; Human ; Human Channel Capacity ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Knowledge Level ; Learning Environment ; Male ; Mobile Devices ; Mobile Learning ; Morphology ; Multiple Choice Tests ; Online instruction ; Plants (Botany) ; Quick Response ; School environment ; Selection ; Short Term Memory ; Statistical Analysis ; Taiwan ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education ; Telecommunications</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1105648$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</description><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Handheld Devices</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Channel Capacity</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning Environment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobile Devices</subject><subject>Mobile Learning</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Multiple Choice Tests</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Plants (Botany)</subject><subject>Quick Response</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Selection</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOI5evAsBb2JrpZNOOt6WYdxVZvHf6jXUdFeWXnuTMekW9uv4SU0zy64nQ-AR3q9ehSrGngt4I0Cat9TPsJwWHrCVsNJWtTD6IVsB1HUFWsvH7EnOVwWR5bFif7beUzdlHj0_jz0teoHpkqYi-Sf_RmOxhxh4uTvCFIZwyU_2cZ745xFDqRwCx1K7H0a6J7bh95BiuKYwveOlR0yTn0d-jmHG8Z_UH5TynG-JkXLmX75Wm-Ujd8xT9sjjmOnZra7Z9_fbi81Ztft0-mFzsqtQKj1VQmtAsTc9KGmwbZTxVjStlARKN33vEXoB1PY1AFptvGltR0qhNha0tXLNXh5zDyn-milP7irOKZSWTrRQq0ZA0_yXMrWSda3LYNfs1ZHqUsw5kXeHNFxjunEC3LIpd7-pAr84wpSG7g7cfhSloVZt8V8ffTygO-SbDtM0dGVY3ZxSGfCSVUJb1zhtlfwLPL-eqw</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Gao, Yuan</creator><creator>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creator><creator>Paas, Fred</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</title><author>Gao, Yuan ; Liu, Tzu-Chien ; Paas, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Handheld Devices</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Channel Capacity</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning Environment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobile Devices</topic><topic>Mobile Learning</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Multiple Choice Tests</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Plants (Botany)</topic><topic>Quick Response</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Selection</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tzu-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yuan</au><au>Liu, Tzu-Chien</au><au>Paas, Fred</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1105648</ericid><atitle>Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>704</epage><pages>694-704</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPAS</coden><abstract>This study compared the effects of effortless selection of target plants using quick respond (QR) code technology to effortful manual search and selection of target plants on learning about plants in a mobile device supported learning environment. In addition, it was investigated whether the effectiveness of the 2 selection methods was differentially affected by the number of target plants (6, 8, 10 plants) the students could choose from. Results on a plant recognition test revealed that selection through QR codes was superior to manual selection when the number of plants was high, whereas manual selection was superior with the lower and medium number of plants. In contrast, results on a leaf morphology test revealed that the QR code technology was more effective compared to the manual search selection for learning regardless of the number of target plants. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/edu0000080</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5305</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2016-07, Vol.108 (5), p.694-704 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1802451055 |
source | PsycArticles (EBSCO); ERIC |
subjects | Coding Cognitive Processes Comparative studies Difficulty Level Education Educational Technology Electronic Learning Elementary School Students Female Flowers & plants Foreign Countries Grade 5 Grade 6 Handheld Devices Human Human Channel Capacity Instructional Effectiveness Knowledge Level Learning Environment Male Mobile Devices Mobile Learning Morphology Multiple Choice Tests Online instruction Plants (Botany) Quick Response School environment Selection Short Term Memory Statistical Analysis Taiwan Teaching Methods Technology Uses in Education Telecommunications |
title | Effects of Mode of Target Task Selection on Learning About Plants in a Mobile Learning Environment: Effortful Manual Selection Versus Effortless QR-Code Selection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Mode%20of%20Target%20Task%20Selection%20on%20Learning%20About%20Plants%20in%20a%20Mobile%20Learning%20Environment:%20Effortful%20Manual%20Selection%20Versus%20Effortless%20QR-Code%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Gao,%20Yuan&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=704&rft.pages=694-704&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1724322666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-1660a1b7d0437a8547f915833e0465ddfa0d10e8d200a967f789ce44a67906993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1724322666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1105648&rfr_iscdi=true |