Loading…
Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations
Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3 |
container_end_page | 289 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Journal of radiotherapy in practice |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Goyal, Manish K. Kehwar, T. S. Manjhi, Jayanand Barker, Jerry L. Heintz, Bret H. Shide, Kathleen L. Rai, D. V. |
description | Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1460396916000133 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1807632496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396916000133</cupid><sourcerecordid>4132148381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtPwzAMrhBIjMEP4BaJcyFOsnY9jvGUJnEYnCs3dddMbTOSbNL-CT-X7nEAIS62ZX8PS18UXQO_BQ7p3RxUwmWWZJBwzkHKk2jQr9IYQMLpfubx7n4eXXi_5FwpxdNB9PVgvWkpOKMZbbBZYzC2Y7ZiAbuS2rhATyXT5DZGY8Nqs6jj0nqKHQZihUNdb0NNDldbFhxhaKkLbNVg15luwdZ-Vyct9QbYsftf-LnVhsKWCQ7AHGnb9uRy_4G_jM4qbDxdHfsw-nh6fJ--xLO359fpZBZrCWmIRZalQqtxoUd6lAmCMS85CaqQVFaBkEUqlC5JA0qkQiWoSGjKhBpp1Q9yGN0cdFfOfq7Jh3xp167rLfNeK02kUFnSo-CA0s5676jKV8606LY58HwXQP4ngJ4jjxxsC2fKBf2Q_pf1DTXFi34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807632496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396916000133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Original Articles</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396916000133/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehwar, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjhi, Jayanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Bret H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shide, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</description><subject>Original Articles</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UUtPwzAMrhBIjMEP4BaJcyFOsnY9jvGUJnEYnCs3dddMbTOSbNL-CT-X7nEAIS62ZX8PS18UXQO_BQ7p3RxUwmWWZJBwzkHKk2jQr9IYQMLpfubx7n4eXXi_5FwpxdNB9PVgvWkpOKMZbbBZYzC2Y7ZiAbuS2rhATyXT5DZGY8Nqs6jj0nqKHQZihUNdb0NNDldbFhxhaKkLbNVg15luwdZ-Vyct9QbYsftf-LnVhsKWCQ7AHGnb9uRy_4G_jM4qbDxdHfsw-nh6fJ--xLO359fpZBZrCWmIRZalQqtxoUd6lAmCMS85CaqQVFaBkEUqlC5JA0qkQiWoSGjKhBpp1Q9yGN0cdFfOfq7Jh3xp167rLfNeK02kUFnSo-CA0s5676jKV8606LY58HwXQP4ngJ4jjxxsC2fKBf2Q_pf1DTXFi34</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Goyal, Manish K.</creator><creator>Kehwar, T. S.</creator><creator>Manjhi, Jayanand</creator><creator>Barker, Jerry L.</creator><creator>Heintz, Bret H.</creator><creator>Shide, Kathleen L.</creator><creator>Rai, D. V.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><author>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Original Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehwar, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjhi, Jayanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Bret H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shide, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goyal, Manish K.</au><au>Kehwar, T. S.</au><au>Manjhi, Jayanand</au><au>Barker, Jerry L.</au><au>Heintz, Bret H.</au><au>Shide, Kathleen L.</au><au>Rai, D. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>283-289</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396916000133</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3969 |
ispartof | Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289 |
issn | 1460-3969 1467-1131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1807632496 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Original Articles |
title | Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20tandem-based%20cervical%20high-dose-rate%20brachytherapy%20treatment%20planning%20using%20American%20Brachytherapy%20Society%202011%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Goyal,%20Manish%20K.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=283-289&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396916000133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4132148381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807632496&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396916000133&rfr_iscdi=true |