Loading…

Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations

Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289
Main Authors: Goyal, Manish K., Kehwar, T. S., Manjhi, Jayanand, Barker, Jerry L., Heintz, Bret H., Shide, Kathleen L., Rai, D. V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3
container_end_page 289
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Journal of radiotherapy in practice
container_volume 15
creator Goyal, Manish K.
Kehwar, T. S.
Manjhi, Jayanand
Barker, Jerry L.
Heintz, Bret H.
Shide, Kathleen L.
Rai, D. V.
description Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1460396916000133
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1807632496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396916000133</cupid><sourcerecordid>4132148381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtPwzAMrhBIjMEP4BaJcyFOsnY9jvGUJnEYnCs3dddMbTOSbNL-CT-X7nEAIS62ZX8PS18UXQO_BQ7p3RxUwmWWZJBwzkHKk2jQr9IYQMLpfubx7n4eXXi_5FwpxdNB9PVgvWkpOKMZbbBZYzC2Y7ZiAbuS2rhATyXT5DZGY8Nqs6jj0nqKHQZihUNdb0NNDldbFhxhaKkLbNVg15luwdZ-Vyct9QbYsftf-LnVhsKWCQ7AHGnb9uRy_4G_jM4qbDxdHfsw-nh6fJ--xLO359fpZBZrCWmIRZalQqtxoUd6lAmCMS85CaqQVFaBkEUqlC5JA0qkQiWoSGjKhBpp1Q9yGN0cdFfOfq7Jh3xp167rLfNeK02kUFnSo-CA0s5676jKV8606LY58HwXQP4ngJ4jjxxsC2fKBf2Q_pf1DTXFi34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807632496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396916000133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Original Articles</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396916000133/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehwar, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjhi, Jayanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Bret H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shide, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</description><subject>Original Articles</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UUtPwzAMrhBIjMEP4BaJcyFOsnY9jvGUJnEYnCs3dddMbTOSbNL-CT-X7nEAIS62ZX8PS18UXQO_BQ7p3RxUwmWWZJBwzkHKk2jQr9IYQMLpfubx7n4eXXi_5FwpxdNB9PVgvWkpOKMZbbBZYzC2Y7ZiAbuS2rhATyXT5DZGY8Nqs6jj0nqKHQZihUNdb0NNDldbFhxhaKkLbNVg15luwdZ-Vyct9QbYsftf-LnVhsKWCQ7AHGnb9uRy_4G_jM4qbDxdHfsw-nh6fJ--xLO359fpZBZrCWmIRZalQqtxoUd6lAmCMS85CaqQVFaBkEUqlC5JA0qkQiWoSGjKhBpp1Q9yGN0cdFfOfq7Jh3xp167rLfNeK02kUFnSo-CA0s5676jKV8606LY58HwXQP4ngJ4jjxxsC2fKBf2Q_pf1DTXFi34</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Goyal, Manish K.</creator><creator>Kehwar, T. S.</creator><creator>Manjhi, Jayanand</creator><creator>Barker, Jerry L.</creator><creator>Heintz, Bret H.</creator><creator>Shide, Kathleen L.</creator><creator>Rai, D. V.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</title><author>Goyal, Manish K. ; Kehwar, T. S. ; Manjhi, Jayanand ; Barker, Jerry L. ; Heintz, Bret H. ; Shide, Kathleen L. ; Rai, D. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Original Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Manish K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehwar, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjhi, Jayanand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Bret H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shide, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, D. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goyal, Manish K.</au><au>Kehwar, T. S.</au><au>Manjhi, Jayanand</au><au>Barker, Jerry L.</au><au>Heintz, Bret H.</au><au>Shide, Kathleen L.</au><au>Rai, D. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>283-289</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study evaluated dosimetric parameters for cervical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment using varying dose prescription methods. Methods This study includes 125 tandem-based cervical HDR brachytherapy treatment plans of 25 patients who received HDR brachytherapy. Delineation of high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) and organ at risk were done on original computed tomographic images. The dose prescription point was defined as per International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements Report Number 38 (ICRU-38), also redefined using American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 2011 criteria. The coverage index (V100) for each HR-CTV was calculated using dose volume histogram parameters. A plot between HR-CTV and V100 was plotted using the best-fit linear regression line (least-square fit analysis). Results Mean prescribed dose to ICRU-38 Point A was 590·47±28·65 cGy, and to ABS Point A was 593·35±30·42 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference between planned ICRU-38 and calculated ABS Point A doses (p=0·23). The plot between HR-CTV and V100 is well defined by the best-fit linear regression line with a correlation coefficient of 0·9519. Conclusion For cervical HDR brachytherapy, dose prescription to an arbitrarily defined point (e.g., Point A) does not provide consistent coverage of HR-CTV. The difference in coverage between two dose prescription approaches increases with increasing CTV. Our ongoing work evaluates the dosimetric consequences of volumetric dose prescription approaches for these patients.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396916000133</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3969
ispartof Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2016-09, Vol.15 (3), p.283-289
issn 1460-3969
1467-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1807632496
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Original Articles
title Dosimetric evaluation of tandem-based cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning using American Brachytherapy Society 2011 recommendations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20tandem-based%20cervical%20high-dose-rate%20brachytherapy%20treatment%20planning%20using%20American%20Brachytherapy%20Society%202011%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Goyal,%20Manish%20K.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=283-289&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396916000133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4132148381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-29972c48bc5c592e180d0e2efae49f123b724cdec1a3aeb46a4e2ce9245c42ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807632496&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396916000133&rfr_iscdi=true