Loading…

507 FEMTOSECOND LASER PREPARATION OF DONOR TISSUE FROM THE ENDOTHELIAL SIDE

PurposeThe femtosecond laser (Intralase) may provide advantages for dissecting a thin, uniform thickness posterior lamellar disk of donor tissue to be used for endothelial transplantation. We investigated the use of the Intralase to dissect the donor cornea from the posterior side to better obtain a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of investigative medicine 2006-01, Vol.54 (1), p.S166-S167
Main Authors: Sikder, S., Snyder, R. W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PurposeThe femtosecond laser (Intralase) may provide advantages for dissecting a thin, uniform thickness posterior lamellar disk of donor tissue to be used for endothelial transplantation. We investigated the use of the Intralase to dissect the donor cornea from the posterior side to better obtain a thin and uniform lamellar disk. We investigated the use of a viscoelastic “cushion” to protect the endothelium during applanation and laser delivery.MethodsHuman eye bank donor buttons were placed endothelial side up, covered with a thin coat of viscoelastic, and brought into contact with the Intralase applanation lens. A 7.0 mm diameter, 100 μm lamellar disk was cut from the endothelial side. The endothelial viability following these procedures was determined using a live cell/dead cell assay. Controls were designed to assess the endothelial viability after applanation and laser application using only a balanced salt solution (BSS) cushion instead of viscoelastic material. Additionally, applanation without lasering using either BSS or a viscoelastic cushion was studied.ResultsThe average endothelial cell loss in the laser experiment sets were 10% (n = 5, range of 4-17%, sodium hyaluronate), 14% (n = 5, range of 7-19%, sodium hyaluronate-sodium chondroitin), and 6% (n = 5, range of 3-11%, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose). In the controls, laser and applanation with BSS resulted in an average endothelial loss of 18% (n = 5, range of 14-26%). Applanation alone without laser dissection resulted in cell loss of 9% (n = 5, range of 7-12%) using BSS and 9% (n = 6, range 1-42%) hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.ConclusionThe technique of using a viscoelastic “cushion” to protect endothelial cells from damage during posterior laser dissection prior to transplantation is promising. Viscoelastic coating protects the endothelial layer from damage from the coupling lens better than a layer of BSS. The lasering process, however, does cause damage in addition to applanation with the laser lens. Further studies are warranted to optimize reproducibility of endothelial cell survival and to evaluate the smoothness of stromal dissections in the posterior cornea.
ISSN:1081-5589
1708-8267
DOI:10.2310/6650.2005.X0004.506