Loading…

Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community

This study aims to evaluate extensively the inhibition of six PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) congeners in batch reactors under fermentative-methanogenic condition. The reactors with anaerobic sludge were fed with mineral medium, co-substrates (ethanol and sodium formate), and five PCB concentration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2016-09, Vol.227 (9), p.1, Article 316
Main Authors: de Lima e Silva, M. R., Motteran, F., Sakamoto, I. K., Varesche, M. B. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1
container_title Water, air, and soil pollution
container_volume 227
creator de Lima e Silva, M. R.
Motteran, F.
Sakamoto, I. K.
Varesche, M. B. A.
description This study aims to evaluate extensively the inhibition of six PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) congeners in batch reactors under fermentative-methanogenic condition. The reactors with anaerobic sludge were fed with mineral medium, co-substrates (ethanol and sodium formate), and five PCB concentrations. The maximum methane production (MMP) in the reactor without PCB (RC), with 0.5 (R0.5), 1.5 (R1.5), 3.0 (R3.0), 4.5 (R4.5), and 6.0 mg/L (R6.0) of PCB, was 654.83, 193.08, 111.65, 104.60, 96.67, and 79.50 μmolCH 4 /gTVS, respectively. The methane inhibition for the reactors R0.5, R1.5, R3.0, R4.5, and R6.0 were 70, 83, 84, 85, and 88 %, respectively. The concentration that causes 50 % of inhibition (IC 50 ) for PCB was 0.03 mg/L. The inhibition results present two different profiles according to the concentration range. The concentration range of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/L of PCB inhibited the acetoclastic microorganisms and the concentration of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L inhibited both methanogenic and acidogenic population. The acidogenic populations were less sensitive to the PCB than the methanogenic. Lower methane production and organic matter removal were verified in all reactors with PCB compared to RC, without PCB. The microbial community highlighted lower diversity index for reactors with higher PCB concentration. In the reactors with PCB, the populations of bacteria domain were more susceptible to composition changes than the archaea domain. The inhibitory effect of PCB is concentration-dependent and affected differently the populations of organisms in the reactor. Moreover, the range of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L of PCB severely inhibited the anaerobic community.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11270-016-3016-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1811904603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A606400115</galeid><sourcerecordid>A606400115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFv2zAMhYWhA5Zm_QG9GdjZGWkplr1bFjRbgQ7bIT0LikwnCmwpk5yi_veV4R16GQWQgvC-R-Exdo-wQgD5NSIWEnLAMudTkx_YAteS50XNixu2ABB1Xtay_sRuYzxDqrqSC3bYOE3BH6zJ9v7VGjuM2SZGPWa-zf74bjSnzgfr9EBN9t1eTuTG7lu28-YaM--yHYWe3KAH-0L5LxpO2vkjuWS39X1_dcnvM_vY6i7S3b-5ZM-7h_32Z_70-8fjdvOUG75eDznJAsqyOTRYGYJCGEFUNwIE8LbmBMihOPB0kW3VNpIEopC60ICySkLOl-zL7HsJ_u-V4qDO_hpcWqmwQqxBlDCpVrPqqDtS1rV-CNqk01BvjXfU2vS-KaEUAIjrBOAMmOBjDNSqS7C9DqNCUFP2as5epdjVlL2SiSlmJiatO1J495X_Qm-aI4aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811904603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>de Lima e Silva, M. R. ; Motteran, F. ; Sakamoto, I. K. ; Varesche, M. B. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Lima e Silva, M. R. ; Motteran, F. ; Sakamoto, I. K. ; Varesche, M. B. A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate extensively the inhibition of six PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) congeners in batch reactors under fermentative-methanogenic condition. The reactors with anaerobic sludge were fed with mineral medium, co-substrates (ethanol and sodium formate), and five PCB concentrations. The maximum methane production (MMP) in the reactor without PCB (RC), with 0.5 (R0.5), 1.5 (R1.5), 3.0 (R3.0), 4.5 (R4.5), and 6.0 mg/L (R6.0) of PCB, was 654.83, 193.08, 111.65, 104.60, 96.67, and 79.50 μmolCH 4 /gTVS, respectively. The methane inhibition for the reactors R0.5, R1.5, R3.0, R4.5, and R6.0 were 70, 83, 84, 85, and 88 %, respectively. The concentration that causes 50 % of inhibition (IC 50 ) for PCB was 0.03 mg/L. The inhibition results present two different profiles according to the concentration range. The concentration range of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/L of PCB inhibited the acetoclastic microorganisms and the concentration of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L inhibited both methanogenic and acidogenic population. The acidogenic populations were less sensitive to the PCB than the methanogenic. Lower methane production and organic matter removal were verified in all reactors with PCB compared to RC, without PCB. The microbial community highlighted lower diversity index for reactors with higher PCB concentration. In the reactors with PCB, the populations of bacteria domain were more susceptible to composition changes than the archaea domain. The inhibitory effect of PCB is concentration-dependent and affected differently the populations of organisms in the reactor. Moreover, the range of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L of PCB severely inhibited the anaerobic community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-3016-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bacteria ; Batch reactors ; Bioaccumulation ; Chlorine ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Ethanol ; Fermentation ; Hydrogeology ; Metabolism ; Methane ; Methane biosynthesis ; Microorganisms ; Organic matter ; PCB ; Polychlorinated biphenyls ; Reactors ; Sludge ; Sodium ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Studies ; Toxicity ; Trace elements ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2016-09, Vol.227 (9), p.1, Article 316</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1811904603/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1811904603?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Lima e Silva, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motteran, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, I. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varesche, M. B. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><addtitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate extensively the inhibition of six PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) congeners in batch reactors under fermentative-methanogenic condition. The reactors with anaerobic sludge were fed with mineral medium, co-substrates (ethanol and sodium formate), and five PCB concentrations. The maximum methane production (MMP) in the reactor without PCB (RC), with 0.5 (R0.5), 1.5 (R1.5), 3.0 (R3.0), 4.5 (R4.5), and 6.0 mg/L (R6.0) of PCB, was 654.83, 193.08, 111.65, 104.60, 96.67, and 79.50 μmolCH 4 /gTVS, respectively. The methane inhibition for the reactors R0.5, R1.5, R3.0, R4.5, and R6.0 were 70, 83, 84, 85, and 88 %, respectively. The concentration that causes 50 % of inhibition (IC 50 ) for PCB was 0.03 mg/L. The inhibition results present two different profiles according to the concentration range. The concentration range of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/L of PCB inhibited the acetoclastic microorganisms and the concentration of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L inhibited both methanogenic and acidogenic population. The acidogenic populations were less sensitive to the PCB than the methanogenic. Lower methane production and organic matter removal were verified in all reactors with PCB compared to RC, without PCB. The microbial community highlighted lower diversity index for reactors with higher PCB concentration. In the reactors with PCB, the populations of bacteria domain were more susceptible to composition changes than the archaea domain. The inhibitory effect of PCB is concentration-dependent and affected differently the populations of organisms in the reactor. Moreover, the range of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L of PCB severely inhibited the anaerobic community.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Batch reactors</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane biosynthesis</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>PCB</subject><subject>Polychlorinated biphenyls</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFv2zAMhYWhA5Zm_QG9GdjZGWkplr1bFjRbgQ7bIT0LikwnCmwpk5yi_veV4R16GQWQgvC-R-Exdo-wQgD5NSIWEnLAMudTkx_YAteS50XNixu2ABB1Xtay_sRuYzxDqrqSC3bYOE3BH6zJ9v7VGjuM2SZGPWa-zf74bjSnzgfr9EBN9t1eTuTG7lu28-YaM--yHYWe3KAH-0L5LxpO2vkjuWS39X1_dcnvM_vY6i7S3b-5ZM-7h_32Z_70-8fjdvOUG75eDznJAsqyOTRYGYJCGEFUNwIE8LbmBMihOPB0kW3VNpIEopC60ICySkLOl-zL7HsJ_u-V4qDO_hpcWqmwQqxBlDCpVrPqqDtS1rV-CNqk01BvjXfU2vS-KaEUAIjrBOAMmOBjDNSqS7C9DqNCUFP2as5epdjVlL2SiSlmJiatO1J495X_Qm-aI4aw</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>de Lima e Silva, M. R.</creator><creator>Motteran, F.</creator><creator>Sakamoto, I. K.</creator><creator>Varesche, M. B. A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community</title><author>de Lima e Silva, M. R. ; Motteran, F. ; Sakamoto, I. K. ; Varesche, M. B. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Batch reactors</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane biosynthesis</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>PCB</topic><topic>Polychlorinated biphenyls</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Lima e Silva, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motteran, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, I. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varesche, M. B. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Lima e Silva, M. R.</au><au>Motteran, F.</au><au>Sakamoto, I. K.</au><au>Varesche, M. B. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><stitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</stitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>316</artnum><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate extensively the inhibition of six PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) congeners in batch reactors under fermentative-methanogenic condition. The reactors with anaerobic sludge were fed with mineral medium, co-substrates (ethanol and sodium formate), and five PCB concentrations. The maximum methane production (MMP) in the reactor without PCB (RC), with 0.5 (R0.5), 1.5 (R1.5), 3.0 (R3.0), 4.5 (R4.5), and 6.0 mg/L (R6.0) of PCB, was 654.83, 193.08, 111.65, 104.60, 96.67, and 79.50 μmolCH 4 /gTVS, respectively. The methane inhibition for the reactors R0.5, R1.5, R3.0, R4.5, and R6.0 were 70, 83, 84, 85, and 88 %, respectively. The concentration that causes 50 % of inhibition (IC 50 ) for PCB was 0.03 mg/L. The inhibition results present two different profiles according to the concentration range. The concentration range of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/L of PCB inhibited the acetoclastic microorganisms and the concentration of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L inhibited both methanogenic and acidogenic population. The acidogenic populations were less sensitive to the PCB than the methanogenic. Lower methane production and organic matter removal were verified in all reactors with PCB compared to RC, without PCB. The microbial community highlighted lower diversity index for reactors with higher PCB concentration. In the reactors with PCB, the populations of bacteria domain were more susceptible to composition changes than the archaea domain. The inhibitory effect of PCB is concentration-dependent and affected differently the populations of organisms in the reactor. Moreover, the range of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/L of PCB severely inhibited the anaerobic community.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-016-3016-7</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-6979
ispartof Water, air, and soil pollution, 2016-09, Vol.227 (9), p.1, Article 316
issn 0049-6979
1573-2932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1811904603
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Analysis
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bacteria
Batch reactors
Bioaccumulation
Chlorine
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Ethanol
Fermentation
Hydrogeology
Metabolism
Methane
Methane biosynthesis
Microorganisms
Organic matter
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Reactors
Sludge
Sodium
Soil Science & Conservation
Studies
Toxicity
Trace elements
Water Quality/Water Pollution
Water treatment
title Anaerobic Toxicity Assay of Polychlorinated Biphenyl: Focus on Fermentative-Methanogenic Community
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A57%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anaerobic%20Toxicity%20Assay%20of%20Polychlorinated%20Biphenyl:%20Focus%20on%20Fermentative-Methanogenic%20Community&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=de%20Lima%20e%20Silva,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=316&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-016-3016-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA606400115%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-e72066dbd18ce024c4ee9d40403f93e01302b33e07f8fd7e41147a2a0178e9d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811904603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A606400115&rfr_iscdi=true