Loading…

Conscience and Moral Tyranny

Moral claims based on conscience are increasingly prominent among both health professionals and the general public. These claims are typically treated with deference, and moral examination of them is confined to their impact on others. Such deference is rooted in religious tolerance and an embrace o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives in biology and medicine 2015-10, Vol.58 (4), p.526-534
Main Author: Churchill, Larry R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 534
container_issue 4
container_start_page 526
container_title Perspectives in biology and medicine
container_volume 58
creator Churchill, Larry R
description Moral claims based on conscience are increasingly prominent among both health professionals and the general public. These claims are typically treated with deference, and moral examination of them is confined to their impact on others. Such deference is rooted in religious tolerance and an embrace of personal liberties, reinforced by the idea that conscience plays a special role in assuring moral integrity and preserving personal identity. The result is a regard for conscience that allows it to become tyrannical, both over others and over one's own moral sensibility. Two recent books, Laur is Kaldjian's Practicing Medicine and Ethics (2014) and Judith Andre's Worldly Virtue (2015), illuminate how we can reintegrate conscience within our moral sensibility rather than give it sovereignty over moral life. Andre's interpretation of the virtues of hope and humility is especially helpful in assigning a more modest role to conscience within a dynamic and functional moral framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/pbm.2015.0037
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1812546755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4152318381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-221e1071851552073a5005e7ab4bda8c224689fb0d90676a577f13b44177ee733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFaP3jwUPKfO7O5kkqMEv6DiwXpeNskGWpqk7iaH_Hs3VHQuA8PD-w6PELcIa1SkHo5lu5aAtAZQfCYWSDJPMs7pXCziCRPKM3kprkLYQxxOaSHuir4L1c51lVvZrl69994eVtvJ266brsVFYw_B3fzupfh6ftoWr8nm4-WteNwkFWY4JFKiQ2DMCIkksLIEQI5tqcvaZpWUOs3ypoQ6h5RTS8wNqlJrZHaOlVqK-1Pu0fffowuD2fej72KliQWSdMpEkUpOVOX7ELxrzNHvWusng2BmASYKMLMAMwuIvP5L3btqaMfg_oPT-BWw-ZwlzY6QNAAiqB83Alqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812546755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conscience and Moral Tyranny</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Churchill, Larry R</creator><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Larry R</creatorcontrib><description>Moral claims based on conscience are increasingly prominent among both health professionals and the general public. These claims are typically treated with deference, and moral examination of them is confined to their impact on others. Such deference is rooted in religious tolerance and an embrace of personal liberties, reinforced by the idea that conscience plays a special role in assuring moral integrity and preserving personal identity. The result is a regard for conscience that allows it to become tyrannical, both over others and over one's own moral sensibility. Two recent books, Laur is Kaldjian's Practicing Medicine and Ethics (2014) and Judith Andre's Worldly Virtue (2015), illuminate how we can reintegrate conscience within our moral sensibility rather than give it sovereignty over moral life. Andre's interpretation of the virtues of hope and humility is especially helpful in assigning a more modest role to conscience within a dynamic and functional moral framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5982</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-8795</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2015.0037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBMEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Gays &amp; lesbians ; Religion</subject><ispartof>Perspectives in biology and medicine, 2015-10, Vol.58 (4), p.526-534</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Autumn 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Larry R</creatorcontrib><title>Conscience and Moral Tyranny</title><title>Perspectives in biology and medicine</title><description>Moral claims based on conscience are increasingly prominent among both health professionals and the general public. These claims are typically treated with deference, and moral examination of them is confined to their impact on others. Such deference is rooted in religious tolerance and an embrace of personal liberties, reinforced by the idea that conscience plays a special role in assuring moral integrity and preserving personal identity. The result is a regard for conscience that allows it to become tyrannical, both over others and over one's own moral sensibility. Two recent books, Laur is Kaldjian's Practicing Medicine and Ethics (2014) and Judith Andre's Worldly Virtue (2015), illuminate how we can reintegrate conscience within our moral sensibility rather than give it sovereignty over moral life. Andre's interpretation of the virtues of hope and humility is especially helpful in assigning a more modest role to conscience within a dynamic and functional moral framework.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Gays &amp; lesbians</subject><subject>Religion</subject><issn>0031-5982</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFaP3jwUPKfO7O5kkqMEv6DiwXpeNskGWpqk7iaH_Hs3VHQuA8PD-w6PELcIa1SkHo5lu5aAtAZQfCYWSDJPMs7pXCziCRPKM3kprkLYQxxOaSHuir4L1c51lVvZrl69994eVtvJ266brsVFYw_B3fzupfh6ftoWr8nm4-WteNwkFWY4JFKiQ2DMCIkksLIEQI5tqcvaZpWUOs3ypoQ6h5RTS8wNqlJrZHaOlVqK-1Pu0fffowuD2fej72KliQWSdMpEkUpOVOX7ELxrzNHvWusng2BmASYKMLMAMwuIvP5L3btqaMfg_oPT-BWw-ZwlzY6QNAAiqB83Alqg</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Churchill, Larry R</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Conscience and Moral Tyranny</title><author>Churchill, Larry R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-221e1071851552073a5005e7ab4bda8c224689fb0d90676a577f13b44177ee733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Gays &amp; lesbians</topic><topic>Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Churchill, Larry R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Perspectives in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Churchill, Larry R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conscience and Moral Tyranny</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives in biology and medicine</jtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>526</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>526-534</pages><issn>0031-5982</issn><issn>1529-8795</issn><eissn>1529-8795</eissn><coden>PBMEA8</coden><abstract>Moral claims based on conscience are increasingly prominent among both health professionals and the general public. These claims are typically treated with deference, and moral examination of them is confined to their impact on others. Such deference is rooted in religious tolerance and an embrace of personal liberties, reinforced by the idea that conscience plays a special role in assuring moral integrity and preserving personal identity. The result is a regard for conscience that allows it to become tyrannical, both over others and over one's own moral sensibility. Two recent books, Laur is Kaldjian's Practicing Medicine and Ethics (2014) and Judith Andre's Worldly Virtue (2015), illuminate how we can reintegrate conscience within our moral sensibility rather than give it sovereignty over moral life. Andre's interpretation of the virtues of hope and humility is especially helpful in assigning a more modest role to conscience within a dynamic and functional moral framework.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/pbm.2015.0037</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-5982
ispartof Perspectives in biology and medicine, 2015-10, Vol.58 (4), p.526-534
issn 0031-5982
1529-8795
1529-8795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1812546755
source Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection
subjects Ethics
Gays & lesbians
Religion
title Conscience and Moral Tyranny
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conscience%20and%20Moral%20Tyranny&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Churchill,%20Larry%20R&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=526&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=526-534&rft.issn=0031-5982&rft.eissn=1529-8795&rft.coden=PBMEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/pbm.2015.0037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4152318381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-221e1071851552073a5005e7ab4bda8c224689fb0d90676a577f13b44177ee733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812546755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true