Loading…

Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals

Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2016-08, Vol.130 (3), p.299-303
Main Authors: Kawai, Nobuyuki, Koda, Hiroki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-944785965392f404833b3d6cbcd78ecc91ce26b5bd1ded0e345139c8be9018393
cites
container_end_page 303
container_issue 3
container_start_page 299
container_title Journal of comparative psychology (1983)
container_volume 130
creator Kawai, Nobuyuki
Koda, Hiroki
description Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all detect pictures of snakes among pictures of flowers more quickly than vice versa, but recent neurophysiological and behavioral studies suggest that spiders may, in fact, be processed similarly to nonthreat animals. The evidence of quick detection and rapid fear learning by primates is limited to snakes, and no such evidence exists for spiders, suggesting qualitative differences between fear of snakes and fear of spiders. Here, we show that snake-naive Japanese monkeys detect a single snake picture among 8 nonthreat animal pictures (koala) more quickly than vice versa; however, no such difference in detection was observed between spiders and pleasant animals. These robust differences between snakes and spiders are the most convincing evidence that the primate visual system is predisposed to pay attention to snakes but not spiders. These findings suggest that attentional bias toward snakes has an evolutionary basis but that bias toward spiders is more due to top-down, conceptually driven effects of emotion on attention capture.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/com0000032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1813202247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4155777191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-944785965392f404833b3d6cbcd78ecc91ce26b5bd1ded0e345139c8be9018393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3TAQRkVoIbdpNv0FgmzSUid62ZKyC2me5EFfayHL4-BcR3Ik-YL_fXW5he46s_gYOMwwB6FPlJxQwuWpC69kW5ztoRXVXFeMKPkOrYjkdSUJb_bRh5ReCtJQIVdoc2cn6yEBfgh-DUvCxw_Wlcb9nJzN9jP-Pg9uPS74G2RwGf_0dg0Jt3PGj6GM09BBTGf4chPGOQ_B27jgpzg8Dz7h0OMrsLH6ASNsrM_43A-vdkwf0fu-BBz-zQP0--ry18VNdf90fXtxfl9ZwUSutBBS1bqpuWa9IEJx3vKuca3rpALnNHXAmrZuO9pBR4CLmnLtVAuaUMU1P0BHu71TDG8zpGxewhx9OWmoopwRxoT8LyUVUVQXe4X6sqNcDClF6M0UyzNxMZSYrX3zz36Bv-7gotdMaXE25sGNkNwcI_i8ZQ3lxHDDtOZ_AF8bhj4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780819735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals</title><source>APA PsycArticles</source><creator>Kawai, Nobuyuki ; Koda, Hiroki</creator><contributor>Call, Josep</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Nobuyuki ; Koda, Hiroki ; Call, Josep</creatorcontrib><description>Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all detect pictures of snakes among pictures of flowers more quickly than vice versa, but recent neurophysiological and behavioral studies suggest that spiders may, in fact, be processed similarly to nonthreat animals. The evidence of quick detection and rapid fear learning by primates is limited to snakes, and no such evidence exists for spiders, suggesting qualitative differences between fear of snakes and fear of spiders. Here, we show that snake-naive Japanese monkeys detect a single snake picture among 8 nonthreat animal pictures (koala) more quickly than vice versa; however, no such difference in detection was observed between spiders and pleasant animals. These robust differences between snakes and spiders are the most convincing evidence that the primate visual system is predisposed to pay attention to snakes but not spiders. These findings suggest that attentional bias toward snakes has an evolutionary basis but that bias toward spiders is more due to top-down, conceptually driven effects of emotion on attention capture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animal Ethology ; Arachnida ; Attentional Capture ; Comparative analysis ; Dogs ; Fear ; Female ; Monkeys ; Snakes ; Theory of Evolution ; Wolves</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2016-08, Vol.130 (3), p.299-303</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-944785965392f404833b3d6cbcd78ecc91ce26b5bd1ded0e345139c8be9018393</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0372-1703</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Call, Josep</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><title>Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all detect pictures of snakes among pictures of flowers more quickly than vice versa, but recent neurophysiological and behavioral studies suggest that spiders may, in fact, be processed similarly to nonthreat animals. The evidence of quick detection and rapid fear learning by primates is limited to snakes, and no such evidence exists for spiders, suggesting qualitative differences between fear of snakes and fear of spiders. Here, we show that snake-naive Japanese monkeys detect a single snake picture among 8 nonthreat animal pictures (koala) more quickly than vice versa; however, no such difference in detection was observed between spiders and pleasant animals. These robust differences between snakes and spiders are the most convincing evidence that the primate visual system is predisposed to pay attention to snakes but not spiders. These findings suggest that attentional bias toward snakes has an evolutionary basis but that bias toward spiders is more due to top-down, conceptually driven effects of emotion on attention capture.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal Ethology</subject><subject>Arachnida</subject><subject>Attentional Capture</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Theory of Evolution</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3TAQRkVoIbdpNv0FgmzSUid62ZKyC2me5EFfayHL4-BcR3Ik-YL_fXW5he46s_gYOMwwB6FPlJxQwuWpC69kW5ztoRXVXFeMKPkOrYjkdSUJb_bRh5ReCtJQIVdoc2cn6yEBfgh-DUvCxw_Wlcb9nJzN9jP-Pg9uPS74G2RwGf_0dg0Jt3PGj6GM09BBTGf4chPGOQ_B27jgpzg8Dz7h0OMrsLH6ASNsrM_43A-vdkwf0fu-BBz-zQP0--ry18VNdf90fXtxfl9ZwUSutBBS1bqpuWa9IEJx3vKuca3rpALnNHXAmrZuO9pBR4CLmnLtVAuaUMU1P0BHu71TDG8zpGxewhx9OWmoopwRxoT8LyUVUVQXe4X6sqNcDClF6M0UyzNxMZSYrX3zz36Bv-7gotdMaXE25sGNkNwcI_i8ZQ3lxHDDtOZ_AF8bhj4</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Kawai, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Koda, Hiroki</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-1703</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals</title><author>Kawai, Nobuyuki ; Koda, Hiroki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-944785965392f404833b3d6cbcd78ecc91ce26b5bd1ded0e345139c8be9018393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal Ethology</topic><topic>Arachnida</topic><topic>Attentional Capture</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Theory of Evolution</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kawai, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kawai, Nobuyuki</au><au>Koda, Hiroki</au><au>Call, Josep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>299-303</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all detect pictures of snakes among pictures of flowers more quickly than vice versa, but recent neurophysiological and behavioral studies suggest that spiders may, in fact, be processed similarly to nonthreat animals. The evidence of quick detection and rapid fear learning by primates is limited to snakes, and no such evidence exists for spiders, suggesting qualitative differences between fear of snakes and fear of spiders. Here, we show that snake-naive Japanese monkeys detect a single snake picture among 8 nonthreat animal pictures (koala) more quickly than vice versa; however, no such difference in detection was observed between spiders and pleasant animals. These robust differences between snakes and spiders are the most convincing evidence that the primate visual system is predisposed to pay attention to snakes but not spiders. These findings suggest that attentional bias toward snakes has an evolutionary basis but that bias toward spiders is more due to top-down, conceptually driven effects of emotion on attention capture.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/com0000032</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-1703</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7036
ispartof Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2016-08, Vol.130 (3), p.299-303
issn 0735-7036
1939-2087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1813202247
source APA PsycArticles
subjects Animal
Animal behavior
Animal cognition
Animal Ethology
Arachnida
Attentional Capture
Comparative analysis
Dogs
Fear
Female
Monkeys
Snakes
Theory of Evolution
Wolves
title Japanese Monkeys (Macaca fuscata) Quickly Detect Snakes but Not Spiders: Evolutionary Origins of Fear-Relevant Animals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A13%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Japanese%20Monkeys%20(Macaca%20fuscata)%20Quickly%20Detect%20Snakes%20but%20Not%20Spiders:%20Evolutionary%20Origins%20of%20Fear-Relevant%20Animals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Kawai,%20Nobuyuki&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=299-303&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4155777191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-944785965392f404833b3d6cbcd78ecc91ce26b5bd1ded0e345139c8be9018393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780819735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true