Loading…
The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige
A history of literary prestige needs to study both works that achieved distinction and the mass of volumes from which they were distinguished. To understand how those patterns of preference changed across a century, we gathered two samples of English-language poetry from the period 1820–1919: one dr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Modern language quarterly (Seattle) 2016-09, Vol.77 (3), p.321-344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-24fffdb070dc296e97f180c66c3d4efc2d88274cef0d5e543578af8e2dfa7b5e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 344 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | Modern language quarterly (Seattle) |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Underwood, Ted Sellers, Jordan |
description | A history of literary prestige needs to study both works that achieved distinction and the mass of volumes from which they were distinguished. To understand how those patterns of preference changed across a century, we gathered two samples of English-language poetry from the period 1820–1919: one drawn from volumes reviewed in prominent periodicals and one selected at random from a large digital library (in which the majority of authors are relatively obscure). The stylistic differences associated with literary prominence turn out to be quite stable: a statistical model trained to distinguish reviewed from random volumes in any quarter of this century can make predictions almost as accurate about the rest of the period. The “poetic revolutions” described by many histories are not visible in this model; instead, there is a steady tendency for new volumes of poetry to change by slightly exaggerating certain features that defined prestige in the recent past. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1215/00267929-3570634 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1815501776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4165728111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-24fffdb070dc296e97f180c66c3d4efc2d88274cef0d5e543578af8e2dfa7b5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOwzAUtRBIhMLOGAmJLeC34xGVpxQJhjJbqX1dUqAJdjzwSXwHP4ajFomFu9zhntc9CJ0SfEEoEZcYU6k01RUTCkvG91BBBFUV0Zzto2I6V9P9EB3FuMZ5tGYFOl-8QNn0m1WC8jqF7y8oe1823QihDZ_lU4A4dis4Rge-fYtwstsz9Hx7s5jfV83j3cP8qqksI2KsKPfeuyVW2FmqJWjlSY2tlJY5Dt5SV9dUcQseOwGC56x162ugzrdqKYDN0NlWdwj9R8reZt2nsMmWhtRECEyUkhmFtygb-hgDeDOE7j3nNQSbqQ3z24bZtZEpbEtx6RXSkN-Kf6T_Y_0AUnhg0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815501776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><creator>Underwood, Ted ; Sellers, Jordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Ted ; Sellers, Jordan</creatorcontrib><description>A history of literary prestige needs to study both works that achieved distinction and the mass of volumes from which they were distinguished. To understand how those patterns of preference changed across a century, we gathered two samples of English-language poetry from the period 1820–1919: one drawn from volumes reviewed in prominent periodicals and one selected at random from a large digital library (in which the majority of authors are relatively obscure). The stylistic differences associated with literary prominence turn out to be quite stable: a statistical model trained to distinguish reviewed from random volumes in any quarter of this century can make predictions almost as accurate about the rest of the period. The “poetic revolutions” described by many histories are not visible in this model; instead, there is a steady tendency for new volumes of poetry to change by slightly exaggerating certain features that defined prestige in the recent past.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00267929-3570634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MLQUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Seattle: Duke University Press</publisher><subject>Cultural Studies ; Digital Media ; English ; English language ; History ; Language history ; Literary Criticism ; Literary Theory ; Literature and Literary Studies ; Media Studies ; Poetry ; Prestige</subject><ispartof>Modern language quarterly (Seattle), 2016-09, Vol.77 (3), p.321-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright Duke University Press Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-24fffdb070dc296e97f180c66c3d4efc2d88274cef0d5e543578af8e2dfa7b5e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail></links><search><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellers, Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige</title><title>Modern language quarterly (Seattle)</title><description>A history of literary prestige needs to study both works that achieved distinction and the mass of volumes from which they were distinguished. To understand how those patterns of preference changed across a century, we gathered two samples of English-language poetry from the period 1820–1919: one drawn from volumes reviewed in prominent periodicals and one selected at random from a large digital library (in which the majority of authors are relatively obscure). The stylistic differences associated with literary prominence turn out to be quite stable: a statistical model trained to distinguish reviewed from random volumes in any quarter of this century can make predictions almost as accurate about the rest of the period. The “poetic revolutions” described by many histories are not visible in this model; instead, there is a steady tendency for new volumes of poetry to change by slightly exaggerating certain features that defined prestige in the recent past.</description><subject>Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Digital Media</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Language history</subject><subject>Literary Criticism</subject><subject>Literary Theory</subject><subject>Literature and Literary Studies</subject><subject>Media Studies</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><issn>0026-7929</issn><issn>1527-1943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ULtOwzAUtRBIhMLOGAmJLeC34xGVpxQJhjJbqX1dUqAJdjzwSXwHP4ajFomFu9zhntc9CJ0SfEEoEZcYU6k01RUTCkvG91BBBFUV0Zzto2I6V9P9EB3FuMZ5tGYFOl-8QNn0m1WC8jqF7y8oe1823QihDZ_lU4A4dis4Rge-fYtwstsz9Hx7s5jfV83j3cP8qqksI2KsKPfeuyVW2FmqJWjlSY2tlJY5Dt5SV9dUcQseOwGC56x162ugzrdqKYDN0NlWdwj9R8reZt2nsMmWhtRECEyUkhmFtygb-hgDeDOE7j3nNQSbqQ3z24bZtZEpbEtx6RXSkN-Kf6T_Y_0AUnhg0g</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Underwood, Ted</creator><creator>Sellers, Jordan</creator><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Duke University Press, NC & IL</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige</title><author>Underwood, Ted ; Sellers, Jordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-24fffdb070dc296e97f180c66c3d4efc2d88274cef0d5e543578af8e2dfa7b5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Digital Media</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Language history</topic><topic>Literary Criticism</topic><topic>Literary Theory</topic><topic>Literature and Literary Studies</topic><topic>Media Studies</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellers, Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Modern language quarterly (Seattle)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Underwood, Ted</au><au>Sellers, Jordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige</atitle><jtitle>Modern language quarterly (Seattle)</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>321-344</pages><issn>0026-7929</issn><eissn>1527-1943</eissn><coden>MLQUAB</coden><abstract>A history of literary prestige needs to study both works that achieved distinction and the mass of volumes from which they were distinguished. To understand how those patterns of preference changed across a century, we gathered two samples of English-language poetry from the period 1820–1919: one drawn from volumes reviewed in prominent periodicals and one selected at random from a large digital library (in which the majority of authors are relatively obscure). The stylistic differences associated with literary prominence turn out to be quite stable: a statistical model trained to distinguish reviewed from random volumes in any quarter of this century can make predictions almost as accurate about the rest of the period. The “poetic revolutions” described by many histories are not visible in this model; instead, there is a steady tendency for new volumes of poetry to change by slightly exaggerating certain features that defined prestige in the recent past.</abstract><cop>Seattle</cop><pub>Duke University Press</pub><doi>10.1215/00267929-3570634</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-7929 |
ispartof | Modern language quarterly (Seattle), 2016-09, Vol.77 (3), p.321-344 |
issn | 0026-7929 1527-1943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1815501776 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text |
subjects | Cultural Studies Digital Media English English language History Language history Literary Criticism Literary Theory Literature and Literary Studies Media Studies Poetry Prestige |
title | The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-07T02%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Longue%20Dur%C3%A9e%20of%20Literary%20Prestige&rft.jtitle=Modern%20language%20quarterly%20(Seattle)&rft.au=Underwood,%20Ted&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=321-344&rft.issn=0026-7929&rft.eissn=1527-1943&rft.coden=MLQUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00267929-3570634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4165728111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-24fffdb070dc296e97f180c66c3d4efc2d88274cef0d5e543578af8e2dfa7b5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815501776&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |