Loading…

Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students

Because of the importance of physical activity, new exercise products are gaining popularity internationally. Wearable devices, such as pedometers, have gained much attention. However, it is unknown if they each accurately record and report physical activity. For example, although previous validatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport 2016-06, Vol.87 (S2), p.A78
Main Authors: Sandlin, Judy R, Keathley, Rosanne S, Sandlin, Michael E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue S2
container_start_page A78
container_title Research quarterly for exercise and sport
container_volume 87
creator Sandlin, Judy R
Keathley, Rosanne S
Sandlin, Michael E
description Because of the importance of physical activity, new exercise products are gaining popularity internationally. Wearable devices, such as pedometers, have gained much attention. However, it is unknown if they each accurately record and report physical activity. For example, although previous validation research with pedometers has been conducted, the Gopher FITstep Pro has not been tested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer in a controlled environment and to provide recommendations for placement. Participants (N = 23; Mage = 20 years; 8 women) were recruited from a Southern university. Once enrolled in the study, participants completed a stepcount training protocol. Participants were then asked to wear an elastic belt with 2 Gopher FITstep Pro uploadable pedometers attached and placed over the anterior midline of the leftand right thighs. Prior to data collection, a 20- step test was completed to ensure proper placement and counting accuracy. Participants then traveled a 2-min closed course in a large gymnasium. Each participant selfcounted steps during the 2-min trial. Data were collected over 8 2-min sessions. Twenty-three participants completed at least 1 session with 2 completing 4 sessions, 1 completing 3, and 3 completing 2 for a total of 35 data points. Agreement between self-counted steps and pedometer-recorded steps was analyzed using absolute percent error, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson product- moment correlations. Participants completed the initial stepcount test at 93% to 103% accuracy (M = 98%, SD = 5%). Pedometer step counts for the right side ranged from 178 to 241 per session (M = 210, SD = 15), and for the leftside, they ranged from 180 to 240 (M = 211, SD = 14). Self-reported step counts ranged from 178 to 240 (M = 209, SD = 14). Right-side mean percent difference across 35 data points was 28.57% to 4.89% (M = 0.74%, SD = 2.50%), and the left-side mean percent difference was 28.57% to 6.50% (M = 1.28%, SD = 2.55%). Bland-Altman plots indicated agreement. Pearson product-moment bivariate correlations determined that both pedometers were highly correlated with each other (r = .964, p , .001) and with self-reported step counts (right side, r = .937, p , .001; leftside, r = .928, p , .001). The results displayed difference scores within the acceptable range of 3% error as appropriate for controlled conditions. This error difference suggests that the Gopher FITstep Pro pedome
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1817494274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4173692901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18174942743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjckKwjAYhIMoWJd3CHguNAtN9VZcT170XqT9U1vSpGZ5fyP6AM5lYL4PZoISSvIiZQXlU5RkVGQpYbmYo4VzfRZDGEnQdW-0g1cAXYPDRuJS1eZpFP7sYRh9Z_QOn0E3YPGhkxLsVy0Ho9toKQUt4JsPDWjvVmgmH8rB-tdLtDkd7_tLOloTT5yvehOsjqgiBRF8y6ng7D_rDdP1P3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817494274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Sandlin, Judy R ; Keathley, Rosanne S ; Sandlin, Michael E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandlin, Judy R ; Keathley, Rosanne S ; Sandlin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><description>Because of the importance of physical activity, new exercise products are gaining popularity internationally. Wearable devices, such as pedometers, have gained much attention. However, it is unknown if they each accurately record and report physical activity. For example, although previous validation research with pedometers has been conducted, the Gopher FITstep Pro has not been tested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer in a controlled environment and to provide recommendations for placement. Participants (N = 23; Mage = 20 years; 8 women) were recruited from a Southern university. Once enrolled in the study, participants completed a stepcount training protocol. Participants were then asked to wear an elastic belt with 2 Gopher FITstep Pro uploadable pedometers attached and placed over the anterior midline of the leftand right thighs. Prior to data collection, a 20- step test was completed to ensure proper placement and counting accuracy. Participants then traveled a 2-min closed course in a large gymnasium. Each participant selfcounted steps during the 2-min trial. Data were collected over 8 2-min sessions. Twenty-three participants completed at least 1 session with 2 completing 4 sessions, 1 completing 3, and 3 completing 2 for a total of 35 data points. Agreement between self-counted steps and pedometer-recorded steps was analyzed using absolute percent error, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson product- moment correlations. Participants completed the initial stepcount test at 93% to 103% accuracy (M = 98%, SD = 5%). Pedometer step counts for the right side ranged from 178 to 241 per session (M = 210, SD = 15), and for the leftside, they ranged from 180 to 240 (M = 211, SD = 14). Self-reported step counts ranged from 178 to 240 (M = 209, SD = 14). Right-side mean percent difference across 35 data points was 28.57% to 4.89% (M = 0.74%, SD = 2.50%), and the left-side mean percent difference was 28.57% to 6.50% (M = 1.28%, SD = 2.55%). Bland-Altman plots indicated agreement. Pearson product-moment bivariate correlations determined that both pedometers were highly correlated with each other (r = .964, p , .001) and with self-reported step counts (right side, r = .937, p , .001; leftside, r = .928, p , .001). The results displayed difference scores within the acceptable range of 3% error as appropriate for controlled conditions. This error difference suggests that the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer accurately records steps in a closed environment. These data provide preliminary evidence toward the usefulness of this device for those interested in using wearable devices to track their physical activity. Future research should explore the accuracy of this device in free-living situations that more closely resemble everyday life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-1367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-3824</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RQESD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; College Students ; Gender Differences</subject><ispartof>Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 2016-06, Vol.87 (S2), p.A78</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1817494274/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1817494274?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandlin, Judy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keathley, Rosanne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandlin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><title>Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students</title><title>Research quarterly for exercise and sport</title><description>Because of the importance of physical activity, new exercise products are gaining popularity internationally. Wearable devices, such as pedometers, have gained much attention. However, it is unknown if they each accurately record and report physical activity. For example, although previous validation research with pedometers has been conducted, the Gopher FITstep Pro has not been tested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer in a controlled environment and to provide recommendations for placement. Participants (N = 23; Mage = 20 years; 8 women) were recruited from a Southern university. Once enrolled in the study, participants completed a stepcount training protocol. Participants were then asked to wear an elastic belt with 2 Gopher FITstep Pro uploadable pedometers attached and placed over the anterior midline of the leftand right thighs. Prior to data collection, a 20- step test was completed to ensure proper placement and counting accuracy. Participants then traveled a 2-min closed course in a large gymnasium. Each participant selfcounted steps during the 2-min trial. Data were collected over 8 2-min sessions. Twenty-three participants completed at least 1 session with 2 completing 4 sessions, 1 completing 3, and 3 completing 2 for a total of 35 data points. Agreement between self-counted steps and pedometer-recorded steps was analyzed using absolute percent error, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson product- moment correlations. Participants completed the initial stepcount test at 93% to 103% accuracy (M = 98%, SD = 5%). Pedometer step counts for the right side ranged from 178 to 241 per session (M = 210, SD = 15), and for the leftside, they ranged from 180 to 240 (M = 211, SD = 14). Self-reported step counts ranged from 178 to 240 (M = 209, SD = 14). Right-side mean percent difference across 35 data points was 28.57% to 4.89% (M = 0.74%, SD = 2.50%), and the left-side mean percent difference was 28.57% to 6.50% (M = 1.28%, SD = 2.55%). Bland-Altman plots indicated agreement. Pearson product-moment bivariate correlations determined that both pedometers were highly correlated with each other (r = .964, p , .001) and with self-reported step counts (right side, r = .937, p , .001; leftside, r = .928, p , .001). The results displayed difference scores within the acceptable range of 3% error as appropriate for controlled conditions. This error difference suggests that the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer accurately records steps in a closed environment. These data provide preliminary evidence toward the usefulness of this device for those interested in using wearable devices to track their physical activity. Future research should explore the accuracy of this device in free-living situations that more closely resemble everyday life.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><issn>0270-1367</issn><issn>2168-3824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjckKwjAYhIMoWJd3CHguNAtN9VZcT170XqT9U1vSpGZ5fyP6AM5lYL4PZoISSvIiZQXlU5RkVGQpYbmYo4VzfRZDGEnQdW-0g1cAXYPDRuJS1eZpFP7sYRh9Z_QOn0E3YPGhkxLsVy0Ho9toKQUt4JsPDWjvVmgmH8rB-tdLtDkd7_tLOloTT5yvehOsjqgiBRF8y6ng7D_rDdP1P3g</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Sandlin, Judy R</creator><creator>Keathley, Rosanne S</creator><creator>Sandlin, Michael E</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students</title><author>Sandlin, Judy R ; Keathley, Rosanne S ; Sandlin, Michael E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18174942743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandlin, Judy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keathley, Rosanne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandlin, Michael E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Research quarterly for exercise and sport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandlin, Judy R</au><au>Keathley, Rosanne S</au><au>Sandlin, Michael E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students</atitle><jtitle>Research quarterly for exercise and sport</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>A78</spage><pages>A78-</pages><issn>0270-1367</issn><eissn>2168-3824</eissn><coden>RQESD4</coden><abstract>Because of the importance of physical activity, new exercise products are gaining popularity internationally. Wearable devices, such as pedometers, have gained much attention. However, it is unknown if they each accurately record and report physical activity. For example, although previous validation research with pedometers has been conducted, the Gopher FITstep Pro has not been tested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer in a controlled environment and to provide recommendations for placement. Participants (N = 23; Mage = 20 years; 8 women) were recruited from a Southern university. Once enrolled in the study, participants completed a stepcount training protocol. Participants were then asked to wear an elastic belt with 2 Gopher FITstep Pro uploadable pedometers attached and placed over the anterior midline of the leftand right thighs. Prior to data collection, a 20- step test was completed to ensure proper placement and counting accuracy. Participants then traveled a 2-min closed course in a large gymnasium. Each participant selfcounted steps during the 2-min trial. Data were collected over 8 2-min sessions. Twenty-three participants completed at least 1 session with 2 completing 4 sessions, 1 completing 3, and 3 completing 2 for a total of 35 data points. Agreement between self-counted steps and pedometer-recorded steps was analyzed using absolute percent error, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson product- moment correlations. Participants completed the initial stepcount test at 93% to 103% accuracy (M = 98%, SD = 5%). Pedometer step counts for the right side ranged from 178 to 241 per session (M = 210, SD = 15), and for the leftside, they ranged from 180 to 240 (M = 211, SD = 14). Self-reported step counts ranged from 178 to 240 (M = 209, SD = 14). Right-side mean percent difference across 35 data points was 28.57% to 4.89% (M = 0.74%, SD = 2.50%), and the left-side mean percent difference was 28.57% to 6.50% (M = 1.28%, SD = 2.55%). Bland-Altman plots indicated agreement. Pearson product-moment bivariate correlations determined that both pedometers were highly correlated with each other (r = .964, p , .001) and with self-reported step counts (right side, r = .937, p , .001; leftside, r = .928, p , .001). The results displayed difference scores within the acceptable range of 3% error as appropriate for controlled conditions. This error difference suggests that the Gopher FITstep Pro pedometer accurately records steps in a closed environment. These data provide preliminary evidence toward the usefulness of this device for those interested in using wearable devices to track their physical activity. Future research should explore the accuracy of this device in free-living situations that more closely resemble everyday life.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-1367
ispartof Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 2016-06, Vol.87 (S2), p.A78
issn 0270-1367
2168-3824
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1817494274
source Social Science Premium Collection; Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection; Education Collection; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects Accuracy
College Students
Gender Differences
title Consequences of Alcohol Consumption: Gender Differences Among College Students
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A24%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consequences%20of%20Alcohol%20Consumption:%20Gender%20Differences%20Among%20College%20Students&rft.jtitle=Research%20quarterly%20for%20exercise%20and%20sport&rft.au=Sandlin,%20Judy%20R&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=A78&rft.pages=A78-&rft.issn=0270-1367&rft.eissn=2168-3824&rft.coden=RQESD4&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4173692901%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18174942743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817494274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true