Loading…
Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology
Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of project management 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3 |
container_end_page | 1359 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1347 |
container_title | International journal of project management |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Cuppen, Eefje Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. Pikaar, Ewout Mehos, Donna C. |
description | Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects.
•We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1821071545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0263786316000041</els_id><sourcerecordid>4187235831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIvoEicE-w4sVNOoIqXVAnxOluOvU4d0jjYSaX-Pa4KZ06rnd2Z3RmELgnOCCbsus1sO3i3kX2Wxz7DJMOYHqEZqThNC0aLYzTDOaMprxg9RWchtBgTjks-Q8P7KL9g7ToNPoG-kQ1soB8T2yed9A2kQckO4gR8s4uo8TKMflLj5CGJV1tQY7hJ3mALsrN9kwzgwxBBu4WQTGEPvSYbGNdOu841u3N0YmQX4OK3ztHnw_3H8ildvTw-L-9WqSrIYkyVwVTX3FSSUVwueE0MZ9GulGVdKlPKShtZ53UFShOgipYVEFNTtqCa5xroHF0ddOOT3xOEUbRu8n08KUiVE8xJWZRxix22lHcheDBi8HYj_U4QLPbpilb8pSv26QpMREw3Em8PRIgetha8CMpCr0BbH90L7ex_Ej-0joqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821071545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><description>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects.
•We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Project management ; Public engagement ; Q methodology ; Research methodology ; Risk governance ; Risk management ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholder analysis ; Stakeholder engagement ; Stakeholders ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of project management, 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd and Association for Project Management and the International Project Management Association</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikaar, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><title>International journal of project management</title><description>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects.
•We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</description><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public engagement</subject><subject>Q methodology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Risk governance</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholder analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0263-7863</issn><issn>1873-4634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIvoEicE-w4sVNOoIqXVAnxOluOvU4d0jjYSaX-Pa4KZ06rnd2Z3RmELgnOCCbsus1sO3i3kX2Wxz7DJMOYHqEZqThNC0aLYzTDOaMprxg9RWchtBgTjks-Q8P7KL9g7ToNPoG-kQ1soB8T2yed9A2kQckO4gR8s4uo8TKMflLj5CGJV1tQY7hJ3mALsrN9kwzgwxBBu4WQTGEPvSYbGNdOu841u3N0YmQX4OK3ztHnw_3H8ildvTw-L-9WqSrIYkyVwVTX3FSSUVwueE0MZ9GulGVdKlPKShtZ53UFShOgipYVEFNTtqCa5xroHF0ddOOT3xOEUbRu8n08KUiVE8xJWZRxix22lHcheDBi8HYj_U4QLPbpilb8pSv26QpMREw3Em8PRIgetha8CMpCr0BbH90L7ex_Ej-0joqM</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Cuppen, Eefje</creator><creator>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creator><creator>Pikaar, Ewout</creator><creator>Mehos, Donna C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><author>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public engagement</topic><topic>Q methodology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Risk governance</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholder analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikaar, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuppen, Eefje</au><au>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</au><au>Pikaar, Ewout</au><au>Mehos, Donna C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</atitle><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1347</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1347-1359</pages><issn>0263-7863</issn><eissn>1873-4634</eissn><abstract>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects.
•We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-7863 |
ispartof | International journal of project management, 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359 |
issn | 0263-7863 1873-4634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1821071545 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Project management Public engagement Q methodology Research methodology Risk governance Risk management Social responsibility Stakeholder analysis Stakeholder engagement Stakeholders Studies |
title | Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%20engagement%20in%20large-scale%20energy%20infrastructure%20projects:%20Revealing%20perspectives%20using%20Q%20methodology&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20project%20management&rft.au=Cuppen,%20Eefje&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1347&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1347-1359&rft.issn=0263-7863&rft.eissn=1873-4634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4187235831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821071545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |