Loading…

Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology

Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of project management 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359
Main Authors: Cuppen, Eefje, Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C., Pikaar, Ewout, Mehos, Donna C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3
container_end_page 1359
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1347
container_title International journal of project management
container_volume 34
creator Cuppen, Eefje
Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.
Pikaar, Ewout
Mehos, Donna C.
description Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects. •We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1821071545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0263786316000041</els_id><sourcerecordid>4187235831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIvoEicE-w4sVNOoIqXVAnxOluOvU4d0jjYSaX-Pa4KZ06rnd2Z3RmELgnOCCbsus1sO3i3kX2Wxz7DJMOYHqEZqThNC0aLYzTDOaMprxg9RWchtBgTjks-Q8P7KL9g7ToNPoG-kQ1soB8T2yed9A2kQckO4gR8s4uo8TKMflLj5CGJV1tQY7hJ3mALsrN9kwzgwxBBu4WQTGEPvSYbGNdOu841u3N0YmQX4OK3ztHnw_3H8ildvTw-L-9WqSrIYkyVwVTX3FSSUVwueE0MZ9GulGVdKlPKShtZ53UFShOgipYVEFNTtqCa5xroHF0ddOOT3xOEUbRu8n08KUiVE8xJWZRxix22lHcheDBi8HYj_U4QLPbpilb8pSv26QpMREw3Em8PRIgetha8CMpCr0BbH90L7ex_Ej-0joqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821071545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><description>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects. •We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Project management ; Public engagement ; Q methodology ; Research methodology ; Risk governance ; Risk management ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholder analysis ; Stakeholder engagement ; Stakeholders ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of project management, 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd and Association for Project Management and the International Project Management Association</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikaar, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><title>International journal of project management</title><description>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects. •We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</description><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public engagement</subject><subject>Q methodology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Risk governance</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholder analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0263-7863</issn><issn>1873-4634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIvoEicE-w4sVNOoIqXVAnxOluOvU4d0jjYSaX-Pa4KZ06rnd2Z3RmELgnOCCbsus1sO3i3kX2Wxz7DJMOYHqEZqThNC0aLYzTDOaMprxg9RWchtBgTjks-Q8P7KL9g7ToNPoG-kQ1soB8T2yed9A2kQckO4gR8s4uo8TKMflLj5CGJV1tQY7hJ3mALsrN9kwzgwxBBu4WQTGEPvSYbGNdOu841u3N0YmQX4OK3ztHnw_3H8ildvTw-L-9WqSrIYkyVwVTX3FSSUVwueE0MZ9GulGVdKlPKShtZ53UFShOgipYVEFNTtqCa5xroHF0ddOOT3xOEUbRu8n08KUiVE8xJWZRxix22lHcheDBi8HYj_U4QLPbpilb8pSv26QpMREw3Em8PRIgetha8CMpCr0BbH90L7ex_Ej-0joqM</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Cuppen, Eefje</creator><creator>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creator><creator>Pikaar, Ewout</creator><creator>Mehos, Donna C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</title><author>Cuppen, Eefje ; Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C. ; Pikaar, Ewout ; Mehos, Donna C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public engagement</topic><topic>Q methodology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Risk governance</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholder analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuppen, Eefje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pikaar, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehos, Donna C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuppen, Eefje</au><au>Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G.C.</au><au>Pikaar, Ewout</au><au>Mehos, Donna C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology</atitle><jtitle>International journal of project management</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1347</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1347-1359</pages><issn>0263-7863</issn><eissn>1873-4634</eissn><abstract>Public opposition is one of the main political, and less predictable, risks of large-scale energy infrastructure projects. External stakeholder management has become indispensable to the governance of risk in such projects. We integrate insights on public engagement from policy and planning studies with the field of project management to contribute to the governance of risk. We present Q methodology as a congruent method for stakeholder analysis that allows for anticipation of unforeseen stakeholder issues or concerns and to kick-off a participatory procedure with external stakeholders. We present an illustration of Q methodology results of a Dutch shale gas exploration project. If used in the stakeholder management process, this method can help reveal perspectives beneficial for both the governance of risks and the identification of opportunities to create socially valued, successful projects. •We integrate public engagement and project management theories for new insights.•Pro-active risk mitigation includes dialogue with external stakeholders.•Q methodology can contribute to pro-active risk mitigation.•Q methodology reveals stakeholder perspectives on a shale gas exploration project.•Understanding stakeholders' perspectives leads to better project management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7863
ispartof International journal of project management, 2016-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1347-1359
issn 0263-7863
1873-4634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1821071545
source Elsevier
subjects Project management
Public engagement
Q methodology
Research methodology
Risk governance
Risk management
Social responsibility
Stakeholder analysis
Stakeholder engagement
Stakeholders
Studies
title Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%20engagement%20in%20large-scale%20energy%20infrastructure%20projects:%20Revealing%20perspectives%20using%20Q%20methodology&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20project%20management&rft.au=Cuppen,%20Eefje&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1347&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1347-1359&rft.issn=0263-7863&rft.eissn=1873-4634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4187235831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-cf03db7f8a630597b1f76101aa5b5cf5a8dfab2b8ecd1e3c358e1fb3693d72de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821071545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true