CREATION AND CAUSALITY IN CHINESE-JESUIT POLEMICAL LITERATURE

During the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, Jesuit missionaries in China published a variety of apologetic and polemical materials in literary Chinese. In these, they opposed the Neo-Confucian idea of cosmogony as the natural evolution of a primordial substance called ai, following se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy east & west 2016-10, Vol.66 (4), p.1251-1272
Main Author: Jones, Charles B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Argumentation
Aristotelianism
Aristotle
Asian literature
Buddhism
Causality
Causation
Causation (Philosophy)
Chinese languages
Chinese philosophy
Christianity
Cosmogony
Existence
Heaven
Infinite regress
Miscommunication
Phenomena
Philosophy, Chinese
Prime mover
Ricci, Matteo (1552-1610)
Society of Jesus
Thought
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:During the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, Jesuit missionaries in China published a variety of apologetic and polemical materials in literary Chinese. In these, they opposed the Neo-Confucian idea of cosmogony as the natural evolution of a primordial substance called ai, following set patterns called "principle" or li, with their own Aristotelian-Thomistic interpretation of the process of creation. This article will first summarize the Neo-Confucian view, and then present the Jesuit view as taught in their colleges by looking at their normative commentary on the subject as discussed by Aristotle. Following that, it will examine the cases made by two Jesuits, Matteo Ricci and Giulio Aleni, in books published in China. Lastly it will explore two specific philosophical issues upon which the two sides failed to connect by looking at the unarticulated presuppositions that impeded communication: (1) the issue of the infinite regress, and (2) the nature of causality itself.
ISSN:0031-8221
1529-1898
1529-1898
DOI:10.1353/pew.2016.0090